老年人认知储备与认知轨迹之间的关系。

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2024-02-14 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igae014
Rabia Khalaila, Christina Dintica, Kristine Yaffe
{"title":"老年人认知储备与认知轨迹之间的关系。","authors":"Rabia Khalaila, Christina Dintica, Kristine Yaffe","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Prior studies on cognitive reserve (CR) and cognitive trajectories are limited and have had conflicting results. Furthermore, most studies have used a single measure of CR that may not reflect a comprehensive exposure. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of individual and composite CR measures on cognitive decline over a 6-year period.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We studied 55,340 participants from 16 European countries, aged 50 and older, who participated in the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe. We used cognitive measures (including immediate memory, delayed memory, verbal fluency, and numeracy) and 3 CR factors (education, occupation, and cognitive activities) collected in 4 waves from 2011 to 2017. Structural equation modeling was used to construct the composite CR score, analyzed as tertile. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the study aims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the highest composite CR tertile was associated with a higher cognition score than the middle and lowest CR tertiles (β: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.29 to -0.26; β: -0.71, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.70, respectively), as well as for all individual cognitive domains. At longitudinal results, compared with the lowest CR, the highest but not the middle CR tertile demonstrated a slower 6-year decline in global cognition (β: -0.02, 95 % CI: -0.03 to -0.01), as well as in all cognitive domains (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>A composite CR could be a protective factor for cognitive performance and cognitive decline, and it is more sensitive and inclusive than an individual CR indicator alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"8 2","pages":"igae014"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10962634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Association Between Cognitive Reserve and Cognitive Trajectories Among Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Rabia Khalaila, Christina Dintica, Kristine Yaffe\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igae014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Prior studies on cognitive reserve (CR) and cognitive trajectories are limited and have had conflicting results. Furthermore, most studies have used a single measure of CR that may not reflect a comprehensive exposure. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of individual and composite CR measures on cognitive decline over a 6-year period.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We studied 55,340 participants from 16 European countries, aged 50 and older, who participated in the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe. We used cognitive measures (including immediate memory, delayed memory, verbal fluency, and numeracy) and 3 CR factors (education, occupation, and cognitive activities) collected in 4 waves from 2011 to 2017. Structural equation modeling was used to construct the composite CR score, analyzed as tertile. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the study aims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, the highest composite CR tertile was associated with a higher cognition score than the middle and lowest CR tertiles (β: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.29 to -0.26; β: -0.71, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.70, respectively), as well as for all individual cognitive domains. At longitudinal results, compared with the lowest CR, the highest but not the middle CR tertile demonstrated a slower 6-year decline in global cognition (β: -0.02, 95 % CI: -0.03 to -0.01), as well as in all cognitive domains (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>A composite CR could be a protective factor for cognitive performance and cognitive decline, and it is more sensitive and inclusive than an individual CR indicator alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"igae014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10962634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae014\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igae014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:之前关于认知储备(CR)和认知轨迹的研究非常有限,而且结果相互矛盾。此外,大多数研究使用的是单一的 CR 测量方法,可能无法反映全面的暴露情况。本研究的目的是确定个体和综合 CR 测量对 6 年认知能力下降的影响:我们研究了来自 16 个欧洲国家的 55,340 名 50 岁及以上的参与者,他们参加了欧洲健康、老龄化和退休调查。我们使用了从 2011 年到 2017 年的 4 次波次中收集的认知测量指标(包括即时记忆、延迟记忆、语言流畅性和计算能力)和 3 个 CR 因素(教育、职业和认知活动)。结构方程模型用于构建 CR 综合得分,并以梯度进行分析。线性混合效应模型用于检验研究目的:基线时,与中间和最低CR三分位数相比,最高综合CR三分位数与较高的认知得分相关(β:-0.28,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.29至-0.26;β:-0.71,95%CI:-0.72至-0.70),所有单个认知领域也是如此。纵向结果显示,与 CR 值最低者相比,CR 值最高的三等分组(而非CR值居中的三等分组)6 年后在总体认知能力(β:-0.02,95% CI:-0.03 至-0.01)以及所有认知领域的下降速度均较慢(P 讨论及启示:综合 CR 可作为认知表现和认知衰退的保护因素,它比单独的 CR 指标更敏感,也更具包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Association Between Cognitive Reserve and Cognitive Trajectories Among Older Adults.

Background and objectives: Prior studies on cognitive reserve (CR) and cognitive trajectories are limited and have had conflicting results. Furthermore, most studies have used a single measure of CR that may not reflect a comprehensive exposure. The objective of this study is to determine the impact of individual and composite CR measures on cognitive decline over a 6-year period.

Research design and methods: We studied 55,340 participants from 16 European countries, aged 50 and older, who participated in the Survey of Health, Aging, and Retirement in Europe. We used cognitive measures (including immediate memory, delayed memory, verbal fluency, and numeracy) and 3 CR factors (education, occupation, and cognitive activities) collected in 4 waves from 2011 to 2017. Structural equation modeling was used to construct the composite CR score, analyzed as tertile. Linear mixed-effect models were used to examine the study aims.

Results: At baseline, the highest composite CR tertile was associated with a higher cognition score than the middle and lowest CR tertiles (β: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.29 to -0.26; β: -0.71, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.70, respectively), as well as for all individual cognitive domains. At longitudinal results, compared with the lowest CR, the highest but not the middle CR tertile demonstrated a slower 6-year decline in global cognition (β: -0.02, 95 % CI: -0.03 to -0.01), as well as in all cognitive domains (p < .05).

Discussion and implications: A composite CR could be a protective factor for cognitive performance and cognitive decline, and it is more sensitive and inclusive than an individual CR indicator alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信