Caterina Verganti , Chiara Suttora , Mariagrazia Zuccarini , Arianna Aceti , Luigi Corvaglia , Arianna Bello , M. Cristina Caselli , Annalisa Guarini , Alessandra Sansavini
{"title":"词汇技能和手势使用:表达型和接受/表达型迟语者之间的比较","authors":"Caterina Verganti , Chiara Suttora , Mariagrazia Zuccarini , Arianna Aceti , Luigi Corvaglia , Arianna Bello , M. Cristina Caselli , Annalisa Guarini , Alessandra Sansavini","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies on late talkers (LTs) highlighted their heterogeneity and the relevance of describing different communicative profiles.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine lexical skills and gesture use in expressive (E-LTs) vs. receptive-expressive (R/E-LTs) LTs through a structured task.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><p>Forty-six 30-month-old screened LTs were distinguished into E-LTs (<em>n</em>= 35) and R/E-LTs (<em>n</em>= 11) according to their receptive skills. Lexical skills and gesture use were assessed with a Picture Naming Game by coding answer accuracy (correct, incorrect, no response), modality of expression (spoken, spoken-gestural, gestural), type of gestures (deictic, representational), and spoken-gestural answers’ semantic relationship (complementary, equivalent, supplementary).</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><p>R/E-LTs showed lower scores than E-LTs for noun and predicate comprehension with fewer correct answers, and production with fewer correct and incorrect answers, and more no responses. R/E-LTs also exhibited lower scores in spoken answers, representational gestures, and equivalent spoken-gestural answers for noun production and in all spoken and gestural answers for predicate production.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><p>Findings highlighted more impaired receptive and expressive lexical skills and lower gesture use in R/E-LTs compared to E-LTs, underlying the relevance of assessing both lexical and gestural skills through a structured task, besides parental questionnaires and developmental scales, to describe LTs’ communicative profiles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089142222400043X/pdfft?md5=56a97499f3fdcb1aa19443918685766c&pid=1-s2.0-S089142222400043X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexical skills and gesture use: A comparison between expressive and receptive/expressive late talkers\",\"authors\":\"Caterina Verganti , Chiara Suttora , Mariagrazia Zuccarini , Arianna Aceti , Luigi Corvaglia , Arianna Bello , M. Cristina Caselli , Annalisa Guarini , Alessandra Sansavini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies on late talkers (LTs) highlighted their heterogeneity and the relevance of describing different communicative profiles.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine lexical skills and gesture use in expressive (E-LTs) vs. receptive-expressive (R/E-LTs) LTs through a structured task.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><p>Forty-six 30-month-old screened LTs were distinguished into E-LTs (<em>n</em>= 35) and R/E-LTs (<em>n</em>= 11) according to their receptive skills. Lexical skills and gesture use were assessed with a Picture Naming Game by coding answer accuracy (correct, incorrect, no response), modality of expression (spoken, spoken-gestural, gestural), type of gestures (deictic, representational), and spoken-gestural answers’ semantic relationship (complementary, equivalent, supplementary).</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><p>R/E-LTs showed lower scores than E-LTs for noun and predicate comprehension with fewer correct answers, and production with fewer correct and incorrect answers, and more no responses. R/E-LTs also exhibited lower scores in spoken answers, representational gestures, and equivalent spoken-gestural answers for noun production and in all spoken and gestural answers for predicate production.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><p>Findings highlighted more impaired receptive and expressive lexical skills and lower gesture use in R/E-LTs compared to E-LTs, underlying the relevance of assessing both lexical and gestural skills through a structured task, besides parental questionnaires and developmental scales, to describe LTs’ communicative profiles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089142222400043X/pdfft?md5=56a97499f3fdcb1aa19443918685766c&pid=1-s2.0-S089142222400043X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089142222400043X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089142222400043X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lexical skills and gesture use: A comparison between expressive and receptive/expressive late talkers
Background
Studies on late talkers (LTs) highlighted their heterogeneity and the relevance of describing different communicative profiles.
Aims
To examine lexical skills and gesture use in expressive (E-LTs) vs. receptive-expressive (R/E-LTs) LTs through a structured task.
Methods and procedures
Forty-six 30-month-old screened LTs were distinguished into E-LTs (n= 35) and R/E-LTs (n= 11) according to their receptive skills. Lexical skills and gesture use were assessed with a Picture Naming Game by coding answer accuracy (correct, incorrect, no response), modality of expression (spoken, spoken-gestural, gestural), type of gestures (deictic, representational), and spoken-gestural answers’ semantic relationship (complementary, equivalent, supplementary).
Outcomes and results
R/E-LTs showed lower scores than E-LTs for noun and predicate comprehension with fewer correct answers, and production with fewer correct and incorrect answers, and more no responses. R/E-LTs also exhibited lower scores in spoken answers, representational gestures, and equivalent spoken-gestural answers for noun production and in all spoken and gestural answers for predicate production.
Conclusions and implications
Findings highlighted more impaired receptive and expressive lexical skills and lower gesture use in R/E-LTs compared to E-LTs, underlying the relevance of assessing both lexical and gestural skills through a structured task, besides parental questionnaires and developmental scales, to describe LTs’ communicative profiles.
期刊介绍:
Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.