词汇技能和手势使用:表达型和接受/表达型迟语者之间的比较

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Caterina Verganti , Chiara Suttora , Mariagrazia Zuccarini , Arianna Aceti , Luigi Corvaglia , Arianna Bello , M. Cristina Caselli , Annalisa Guarini , Alessandra Sansavini
{"title":"词汇技能和手势使用:表达型和接受/表达型迟语者之间的比较","authors":"Caterina Verganti ,&nbsp;Chiara Suttora ,&nbsp;Mariagrazia Zuccarini ,&nbsp;Arianna Aceti ,&nbsp;Luigi Corvaglia ,&nbsp;Arianna Bello ,&nbsp;M. Cristina Caselli ,&nbsp;Annalisa Guarini ,&nbsp;Alessandra Sansavini","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies on late talkers (LTs) highlighted their heterogeneity and the relevance of describing different communicative profiles.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine lexical skills and gesture use in expressive (E-LTs) vs. receptive-expressive (R/E-LTs) LTs through a structured task.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><p>Forty-six 30-month-old screened LTs were distinguished into E-LTs (<em>n</em>= 35) and R/E-LTs (<em>n</em>= 11) according to their receptive skills. Lexical skills and gesture use were assessed with a Picture Naming Game by coding answer accuracy (correct, incorrect, no response), modality of expression (spoken, spoken-gestural, gestural), type of gestures (deictic, representational), and spoken-gestural answers’ semantic relationship (complementary, equivalent, supplementary).</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><p>R/E-LTs showed lower scores than E-LTs for noun and predicate comprehension with fewer correct answers, and production with fewer correct and incorrect answers, and more no responses. R/E-LTs also exhibited lower scores in spoken answers, representational gestures, and equivalent spoken-gestural answers for noun production and in all spoken and gestural answers for predicate production.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><p>Findings highlighted more impaired receptive and expressive lexical skills and lower gesture use in R/E-LTs compared to E-LTs, underlying the relevance of assessing both lexical and gestural skills through a structured task, besides parental questionnaires and developmental scales, to describe LTs’ communicative profiles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089142222400043X/pdfft?md5=56a97499f3fdcb1aa19443918685766c&pid=1-s2.0-S089142222400043X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lexical skills and gesture use: A comparison between expressive and receptive/expressive late talkers\",\"authors\":\"Caterina Verganti ,&nbsp;Chiara Suttora ,&nbsp;Mariagrazia Zuccarini ,&nbsp;Arianna Aceti ,&nbsp;Luigi Corvaglia ,&nbsp;Arianna Bello ,&nbsp;M. Cristina Caselli ,&nbsp;Annalisa Guarini ,&nbsp;Alessandra Sansavini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Studies on late talkers (LTs) highlighted their heterogeneity and the relevance of describing different communicative profiles.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine lexical skills and gesture use in expressive (E-LTs) vs. receptive-expressive (R/E-LTs) LTs through a structured task.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and procedures</h3><p>Forty-six 30-month-old screened LTs were distinguished into E-LTs (<em>n</em>= 35) and R/E-LTs (<em>n</em>= 11) according to their receptive skills. Lexical skills and gesture use were assessed with a Picture Naming Game by coding answer accuracy (correct, incorrect, no response), modality of expression (spoken, spoken-gestural, gestural), type of gestures (deictic, representational), and spoken-gestural answers’ semantic relationship (complementary, equivalent, supplementary).</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes and results</h3><p>R/E-LTs showed lower scores than E-LTs for noun and predicate comprehension with fewer correct answers, and production with fewer correct and incorrect answers, and more no responses. R/E-LTs also exhibited lower scores in spoken answers, representational gestures, and equivalent spoken-gestural answers for noun production and in all spoken and gestural answers for predicate production.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications</h3><p>Findings highlighted more impaired receptive and expressive lexical skills and lower gesture use in R/E-LTs compared to E-LTs, underlying the relevance of assessing both lexical and gestural skills through a structured task, besides parental questionnaires and developmental scales, to describe LTs’ communicative profiles.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089142222400043X/pdfft?md5=56a97499f3fdcb1aa19443918685766c&pid=1-s2.0-S089142222400043X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089142222400043X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089142222400043X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对迟语者(LTs)的研究强调了他们的异质性和描述不同交际特征的相关性。方法和程序根据接受能力将 46 名 30 个月大的筛选出的迟语者分为 E-LTs (35 人)和 R/E-LTs (11 人)。通过图片命名游戏对词汇技能和手势使用进行评估,方法是对答案的准确性(正确、错误、无反应)、表达方式(口语、口语-手势、手势)、手势类型(描述性、表征性)以及口语-手势答案的语义关系(互补、等同、补充)进行编码。结果R/E-LTs在名词和谓词理解方面的得分低于E-LTs,正确答案较少;在制作方面,正确和错误答案较少,无反应较多。结论和意义研究结果表明,与电子低能儿相比,电子低能儿的词汇接受和表达能力更弱,手势使用率更低,这说明除了家长问卷和发展量表外,通过结构化任务评估词汇和手势能力对描述低能儿的交际能力也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lexical skills and gesture use: A comparison between expressive and receptive/expressive late talkers

Background

Studies on late talkers (LTs) highlighted their heterogeneity and the relevance of describing different communicative profiles.

Aims

To examine lexical skills and gesture use in expressive (E-LTs) vs. receptive-expressive (R/E-LTs) LTs through a structured task.

Methods and procedures

Forty-six 30-month-old screened LTs were distinguished into E-LTs (n= 35) and R/E-LTs (n= 11) according to their receptive skills. Lexical skills and gesture use were assessed with a Picture Naming Game by coding answer accuracy (correct, incorrect, no response), modality of expression (spoken, spoken-gestural, gestural), type of gestures (deictic, representational), and spoken-gestural answers’ semantic relationship (complementary, equivalent, supplementary).

Outcomes and results

R/E-LTs showed lower scores than E-LTs for noun and predicate comprehension with fewer correct answers, and production with fewer correct and incorrect answers, and more no responses. R/E-LTs also exhibited lower scores in spoken answers, representational gestures, and equivalent spoken-gestural answers for noun production and in all spoken and gestural answers for predicate production.

Conclusions and implications

Findings highlighted more impaired receptive and expressive lexical skills and lower gesture use in R/E-LTs compared to E-LTs, underlying the relevance of assessing both lexical and gestural skills through a structured task, besides parental questionnaires and developmental scales, to describe LTs’ communicative profiles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信