患者是否能准确回忆骶髂关节类固醇注射后的疼痛程度?患者报告结果中回忆偏差的队列研究。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-03-01
Davin C Gong, Aditya Muralidharan, Bilal B Butt, Ronald Wasserman, Joshua D Piche, Rakesh D Patel, Ilyas Aleem
{"title":"患者是否能准确回忆骶髂关节类固醇注射后的疼痛程度?患者报告结果中回忆偏差的队列研究。","authors":"Davin C Gong, Aditya Muralidharan, Bilal B Butt, Ronald Wasserman, Joshua D Piche, Rakesh D Patel, Ilyas Aleem","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injections are crucial in the diagnostic toolkit for evaluating SIJ pathology. Recall bias is an important component in patient-reported outcomes that has not been well studied in SIJ injection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to characterize the accuracy, direction, and magnitude of pain level recall bias following SIJ steroid injection and study the factors that affect patient recollection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using standardized questionnaires, baseline Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) scores were recorded for patients undergoing SIJ steroid injections at preinjection, at 4 hours postinjection, and at 24 hours postinjection. At a minimum of 2 weeks postinjection, patients were asked to recall their preinjection, 4-hour, and 24-hour postinjection NRS-11 scores. Actual and recalled NRS-11 scores were compared using paired t tests for each time interval. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors that correlated with consistent recall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients with a mean age of 66 years (65% women) were included. Compared to their preinjection pain score, patients showed considerable improvement at both 4 hours (mean difference [MD] = 3.28; 95% CI, 2.68 - 3.89), and 24 hours (MD = 3.23; 95% CI, 2.44 - 4.03) postinjection. Patient recollection of preinjection symptoms was more severe than actual (MD = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31 - 0.99). Patient recollection of symptoms was also more severe than actual at 4 hours (MD = 0.50; 95% CI .04 - 1.04) as well as at 24 hours postinjection (MD = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.16 - 1.44). The magnitude of recall bias was mild and did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. There was a moderate correlation between actual and recalled pain levels when comparing preinjection with the 4-hour postinjection NRS-11 score (correlation coefficient [r] =0.64; P < 0.001) and moderate correlation when comparing preinjection with the 24-hour postinjection NRS-11 score (r = 0.62; P < 0.001). Linear regression models showed that at preinjection, patients with a lower body mass index and the presence of coexisting psychiatric diagnoses were better at recalling their pain (P < 0.05). Patients with a higher body mass index also experienced less pain relief when comparing preinjection with the 4-hour postinjection NRS-11 score (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Recall pain scores were obtained via telephone surveys, which can lead to interview bias. One patient died, and 3 were lost to follow-up. We did not control for patient use of adjunctive pain relief modalities, which may modulate the overall response to injection. SIJ injections can also be diagnostic, so some patients may not have shared the same indication for injection or pain-generating diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients had favorable pain level responses to their SIJ steroid injection for both actual and recall surveys. Although patients demonstrated poor recall of absolute pain scores at preinjection, 4-hour postinjection, and 24-hour postinjection, they demonstrated robust recall of their net pain score improvement at both 4- and 24-hours postinjection. These findings suggest that there is utility in using patient recollection to describe the magnitude of pain relief following treatment for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Patients Accurately Recall Pain Levels Following Sacroiliac Joint Steroid Injection? A Cohort Study of Recall Bias in Patient-reported Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Davin C Gong, Aditya Muralidharan, Bilal B Butt, Ronald Wasserman, Joshua D Piche, Rakesh D Patel, Ilyas Aleem\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injections are crucial in the diagnostic toolkit for evaluating SIJ pathology. Recall bias is an important component in patient-reported outcomes that has not been well studied in SIJ injection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to characterize the accuracy, direction, and magnitude of pain level recall bias following SIJ steroid injection and study the factors that affect patient recollection.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Prospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Level 1 academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using standardized questionnaires, baseline Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) scores were recorded for patients undergoing SIJ steroid injections at preinjection, at 4 hours postinjection, and at 24 hours postinjection. At a minimum of 2 weeks postinjection, patients were asked to recall their preinjection, 4-hour, and 24-hour postinjection NRS-11 scores. Actual and recalled NRS-11 scores were compared using paired t tests for each time interval. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors that correlated with consistent recall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients with a mean age of 66 years (65% women) were included. Compared to their preinjection pain score, patients showed considerable improvement at both 4 hours (mean difference [MD] = 3.28; 95% CI, 2.68 - 3.89), and 24 hours (MD = 3.23; 95% CI, 2.44 - 4.03) postinjection. Patient recollection of preinjection symptoms was more severe than actual (MD = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31 - 0.99). Patient recollection of symptoms was also more severe than actual at 4 hours (MD = 0.50; 95% CI .04 - 1.04) as well as at 24 hours postinjection (MD = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.16 - 1.44). The magnitude of recall bias was mild and did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. There was a moderate correlation between actual and recalled pain levels when comparing preinjection with the 4-hour postinjection NRS-11 score (correlation coefficient [r] =0.64; P < 0.001) and moderate correlation when comparing preinjection with the 24-hour postinjection NRS-11 score (r = 0.62; P < 0.001). Linear regression models showed that at preinjection, patients with a lower body mass index and the presence of coexisting psychiatric diagnoses were better at recalling their pain (P < 0.05). Patients with a higher body mass index also experienced less pain relief when comparing preinjection with the 4-hour postinjection NRS-11 score (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Recall pain scores were obtained via telephone surveys, which can lead to interview bias. One patient died, and 3 were lost to follow-up. We did not control for patient use of adjunctive pain relief modalities, which may modulate the overall response to injection. SIJ injections can also be diagnostic, so some patients may not have shared the same indication for injection or pain-generating diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients had favorable pain level responses to their SIJ steroid injection for both actual and recall surveys. Although patients demonstrated poor recall of absolute pain scores at preinjection, 4-hour postinjection, and 24-hour postinjection, they demonstrated robust recall of their net pain score improvement at both 4- and 24-hours postinjection. These findings suggest that there is utility in using patient recollection to describe the magnitude of pain relief following treatment for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骶髂关节(SIJ)注射是评估 SIJ 病理学的重要诊断工具。回忆偏差是患者报告结果的一个重要组成部分,但对骶髂关节注射的研究还不够深入:本研究旨在确定 SIJ 类固醇注射后疼痛程度回忆偏差的准确性、方向和程度,并研究影响患者回忆的因素:研究设计:前瞻性队列研究:研究设计:前瞻性队列研究:使用标准化问卷,记录接受 SIJ 类固醇注射的患者在注射前、注射后 4 小时和注射后 24 小时的基线数值评定量表 (NRS-11) 评分。注射后至少 2 周,要求患者回忆注射前、注射后 4 小时和注射后 24 小时的 NRS-11 评分。在每个时间间隔内,使用配对 t 检验比较实际和回忆的 NRS-11 评分。使用多变量线性回归确定与回忆一致性相关的因素:纳入的 60 名患者平均年龄为 66 岁(65% 为女性)。与注射前的疼痛评分相比,患者在注射后 4 小时(平均差 [MD] = 3.28;95% CI,2.68 - 3.89)和 24 小时(MD = 3.23;95% CI,2.44 - 4.03)的疼痛评分均有显著改善。患者对注射前症状的回忆比实际症状更严重(MD = 0.65;95% CI,0.31 - 0.99)。在注射后4小时(MD = 0.50; 95% CI .04 - 1.04)和24小时(MD = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.16 - 1.44),患者对症状的回忆也比实际症状严重。回忆偏差程度轻微,未超过最小临床重要性差异。在比较注射前与注射后4小时NRS-11评分时,实际疼痛水平与回忆疼痛水平之间存在中度相关性(相关系数[r] =0.64;P < 0.001);在比较注射前与注射后24小时NRS-11评分时,实际疼痛水平与回忆疼痛水平之间存在中度相关性(r = 0.62;P < 0.001)。线性回归模型显示,在注射前,体重指数较低和同时患有精神疾病的患者更善于回忆疼痛(P < 0.05)。与注射前和注射后4小时的NRS-11评分相比,体重指数较高的患者的疼痛缓解程度也较低(P < 0.05):局限性:通过电话调查获得疼痛回忆评分,这可能导致访谈偏差。1名患者死亡,3名患者失去随访机会。我们没有对患者使用的辅助止痛方式进行控制,这些方式可能会影响对注射的总体反应。SIJ注射也可用于诊断,因此一些患者可能没有相同的注射适应症或疼痛诊断:在实际调查和回忆调查中,患者对 SIJ 类固醇注射的疼痛程度反应良好。虽然患者对注射前、注射后 4 小时和注射后 24 小时的绝对疼痛评分回忆不佳,但他们对注射后 4 小时和 24 小时的净疼痛评分改善情况回忆良好。这些研究结果表明,利用患者的回忆来描述骶髂关节功能障碍治疗后疼痛缓解的程度是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Patients Accurately Recall Pain Levels Following Sacroiliac Joint Steroid Injection? A Cohort Study of Recall Bias in Patient-reported Outcomes.

Background: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) injections are crucial in the diagnostic toolkit for evaluating SIJ pathology. Recall bias is an important component in patient-reported outcomes that has not been well studied in SIJ injection.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the accuracy, direction, and magnitude of pain level recall bias following SIJ steroid injection and study the factors that affect patient recollection.

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Setting: Level 1 academic medical center.

Methods: Using standardized questionnaires, baseline Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) scores were recorded for patients undergoing SIJ steroid injections at preinjection, at 4 hours postinjection, and at 24 hours postinjection. At a minimum of 2 weeks postinjection, patients were asked to recall their preinjection, 4-hour, and 24-hour postinjection NRS-11 scores. Actual and recalled NRS-11 scores were compared using paired t tests for each time interval. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify factors that correlated with consistent recall.

Results: Sixty patients with a mean age of 66 years (65% women) were included. Compared to their preinjection pain score, patients showed considerable improvement at both 4 hours (mean difference [MD] = 3.28; 95% CI, 2.68 - 3.89), and 24 hours (MD = 3.23; 95% CI, 2.44 - 4.03) postinjection. Patient recollection of preinjection symptoms was more severe than actual (MD = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.31 - 0.99). Patient recollection of symptoms was also more severe than actual at 4 hours (MD = 0.50; 95% CI .04 - 1.04) as well as at 24 hours postinjection (MD = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.16 - 1.44). The magnitude of recall bias was mild and did not exceed the minimal clinically important difference. There was a moderate correlation between actual and recalled pain levels when comparing preinjection with the 4-hour postinjection NRS-11 score (correlation coefficient [r] =0.64; P < 0.001) and moderate correlation when comparing preinjection with the 24-hour postinjection NRS-11 score (r = 0.62; P < 0.001). Linear regression models showed that at preinjection, patients with a lower body mass index and the presence of coexisting psychiatric diagnoses were better at recalling their pain (P < 0.05). Patients with a higher body mass index also experienced less pain relief when comparing preinjection with the 4-hour postinjection NRS-11 score (P < 0.05).

Limitations: Recall pain scores were obtained via telephone surveys, which can lead to interview bias. One patient died, and 3 were lost to follow-up. We did not control for patient use of adjunctive pain relief modalities, which may modulate the overall response to injection. SIJ injections can also be diagnostic, so some patients may not have shared the same indication for injection or pain-generating diagnosis.

Conclusions: Patients had favorable pain level responses to their SIJ steroid injection for both actual and recall surveys. Although patients demonstrated poor recall of absolute pain scores at preinjection, 4-hour postinjection, and 24-hour postinjection, they demonstrated robust recall of their net pain score improvement at both 4- and 24-hours postinjection. These findings suggest that there is utility in using patient recollection to describe the magnitude of pain relief following treatment for sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信