经皮椎体成形术后库默尔氏病与骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效和骨水泥分布差异比较。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-03-01
Yuzhi Ning, Ziyu Li, Jiahu Huang, Shuang Xu, Qing Wang, Jiyuan Yan, Song Wang
{"title":"经皮椎体成形术后库默尔氏病与骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的临床疗效和骨水泥分布差异比较。","authors":"Yuzhi Ning, Ziyu Li, Jiahu Huang, Shuang Xu, Qing Wang, Jiyuan Yan, Song Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kummell's disease (KD) and osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) are commonly found in patients with osteoporosis. Several studies have been conducted on bone cement distribution in OVCF or KD; a comparison between the 2 diseases is rarely reported.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy and bone cement distribution difference between KD and OVCFs after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective, nonrandomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Orthopedics from an affiliated hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2018 to December 2020, 61 patients who underwent PKP surgery for single KD or OVCF and met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were assigned to 2 groups: the KD group and the OVCF group. Clinical and radiologic characteristics, including the bone cement volume, leakage, bone cement dispersion scale, anterior vertebral height (AVH), median vertebral height (MVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), Cobb angle and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were analyzed and compared using Mimics three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction images and 3D reconstruction computed tomography, preoperatively, postoperatively, and 2 years after the operation, respectively. The correlations between the bone cement dispersion scale and the VH improvement rate (VHIR), VH change rate (VHCR), VAS improvement rate (VASIR), and follow-up VAS improvement rate (f-VASIR) were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up time was 24.0 months. Postoperative VH, Cobb angle, vertebra volume, and VAS score were significantly improved in the 2 groups (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in postoperative parameters between the 2 groups. While a strong positive correlation between VHIR and bone cement dispersion scale was observed in the OVCF group (P < 0.01), no significant correlation between VHIR and bone cement dispersion scale was found in the KD group. There was no correlation between VASIR and bone cement dispersion scale in both groups. Compared with postoperation, VH was lower in both groups in later follow-up, and the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). VH, VAS, f-VASIR, and VHCR had a worse manifestation in the KD group than in the OVCF group. However, no significant correlation was found between VHCR, f-VASIR, and bone cement dispersion scale in the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study was limited by the non-randomized design, small sample size, and lack of a comprehensive follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was no significant difference in the bone cement distribution and early clinical efficacy between KD and OVCF patients under the same surgical plan and surgeon, OVCF patients exhibited better long-term radiologic and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy and Bone Cement Distribution Difference Between Kummell's Disease and Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture After Percutaneous Kyphoplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Yuzhi Ning, Ziyu Li, Jiahu Huang, Shuang Xu, Qing Wang, Jiyuan Yan, Song Wang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kummell's disease (KD) and osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) are commonly found in patients with osteoporosis. Several studies have been conducted on bone cement distribution in OVCF or KD; a comparison between the 2 diseases is rarely reported.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the clinical efficacy and bone cement distribution difference between KD and OVCFs after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective, nonrandomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Orthopedics from an affiliated hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2018 to December 2020, 61 patients who underwent PKP surgery for single KD or OVCF and met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were assigned to 2 groups: the KD group and the OVCF group. Clinical and radiologic characteristics, including the bone cement volume, leakage, bone cement dispersion scale, anterior vertebral height (AVH), median vertebral height (MVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), Cobb angle and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were analyzed and compared using Mimics three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction images and 3D reconstruction computed tomography, preoperatively, postoperatively, and 2 years after the operation, respectively. The correlations between the bone cement dispersion scale and the VH improvement rate (VHIR), VH change rate (VHCR), VAS improvement rate (VASIR), and follow-up VAS improvement rate (f-VASIR) were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up time was 24.0 months. Postoperative VH, Cobb angle, vertebra volume, and VAS score were significantly improved in the 2 groups (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in postoperative parameters between the 2 groups. While a strong positive correlation between VHIR and bone cement dispersion scale was observed in the OVCF group (P < 0.01), no significant correlation between VHIR and bone cement dispersion scale was found in the KD group. There was no correlation between VASIR and bone cement dispersion scale in both groups. Compared with postoperation, VH was lower in both groups in later follow-up, and the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). VH, VAS, f-VASIR, and VHCR had a worse manifestation in the KD group than in the OVCF group. However, no significant correlation was found between VHCR, f-VASIR, and bone cement dispersion scale in the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This study was limited by the non-randomized design, small sample size, and lack of a comprehensive follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was no significant difference in the bone cement distribution and early clinical efficacy between KD and OVCF patients under the same surgical plan and surgeon, OVCF patients exhibited better long-term radiologic and clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:库姆梅尔病(KD)和骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折(OVCF)常见于骨质疏松症患者。关于骨水泥在 OVCF 或 Kummell 病中的分布情况已有多项研究,但对这两种疾病进行比较的报道却很少:比较经皮椎体成形术(PKP)后 KD 和 OVCF 的临床疗效和骨水泥分布差异:研究设计:这是一项回顾性、非随机对照研究:附属医院骨科:2018年1月至2020年12月,对61例因单发KD或OVCF接受PKP手术且符合纳入标准的患者进行回顾性研究。所有患者被分为两组:KD组和OVCF组。利用 Mimics 三维重建图像和三维重建计算机断层扫描技术,分别对患者术前、术后和术后 2 年的临床和影像学特征进行分析和比较,包括骨水泥量、渗漏、骨水泥弥散量表、椎体前高度(AVH)、椎体中高度(MVH)、椎体后高度(PVH)、Cobb 角和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。此外,还评估了骨水泥弥散量表与 VH 改善率(VHIR)、VH 变化率(VHCR)、VAS 改善率(VASIR)和随访 VAS 改善率(f-VASIR)之间的相关性:结果:平均随访时间为 24.0 个月。两组患者术后VH、Cobb角、椎体体积和VAS评分均有明显改善(P < 0.05)。两组患者术后参数无统计学差异。OVCF 组的 VHIR 与骨水泥弥散量表呈强正相关(P < 0.01),而 KD 组的 VHIR 与骨水泥弥散量表无明显相关性。两组的 VASIR 与骨水泥弥散量表均无相关性。与手术后相比,两组患者在后期随访中的 VH 均较低,两组间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与 OVCF 组相比,KD 组的 VH、VAS、f-VASIR 和 VHCR 表现更差。然而,两组的 VHCR、f-VASIR 和骨水泥弥散量表之间没有发现明显的相关性:本研究的局限性在于非随机设计、样本量较小以及缺乏全面的随访期:尽管在相同的手术方案和外科医生下,KD 和 OVCF 患者的骨水泥分布和早期临床疗效没有明显差异,但 OVCF 患者的长期放射学和临床疗效更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy and Bone Cement Distribution Difference Between Kummell's Disease and Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture After Percutaneous Kyphoplasty.

Background: Kummell's disease (KD) and osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) are commonly found in patients with osteoporosis. Several studies have been conducted on bone cement distribution in OVCF or KD; a comparison between the 2 diseases is rarely reported.

Objectives: To compare the clinical efficacy and bone cement distribution difference between KD and OVCFs after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP).

Study design: This was a retrospective, nonrandomized controlled study.

Setting: Department of Orthopedics from an affiliated hospital.

Methods: From January 2018 to December 2020, 61 patients who underwent PKP surgery for single KD or OVCF and met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were assigned to 2 groups: the KD group and the OVCF group. Clinical and radiologic characteristics, including the bone cement volume, leakage, bone cement dispersion scale, anterior vertebral height (AVH), median vertebral height (MVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), Cobb angle and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were analyzed and compared using Mimics three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction images and 3D reconstruction computed tomography, preoperatively, postoperatively, and 2 years after the operation, respectively. The correlations between the bone cement dispersion scale and the VH improvement rate (VHIR), VH change rate (VHCR), VAS improvement rate (VASIR), and follow-up VAS improvement rate (f-VASIR) were also evaluated.

Results: The mean follow-up time was 24.0 months. Postoperative VH, Cobb angle, vertebra volume, and VAS score were significantly improved in the 2 groups (P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in postoperative parameters between the 2 groups. While a strong positive correlation between VHIR and bone cement dispersion scale was observed in the OVCF group (P < 0.01), no significant correlation between VHIR and bone cement dispersion scale was found in the KD group. There was no correlation between VASIR and bone cement dispersion scale in both groups. Compared with postoperation, VH was lower in both groups in later follow-up, and the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). VH, VAS, f-VASIR, and VHCR had a worse manifestation in the KD group than in the OVCF group. However, no significant correlation was found between VHCR, f-VASIR, and bone cement dispersion scale in the 2 groups.

Limitations: This study was limited by the non-randomized design, small sample size, and lack of a comprehensive follow-up period.

Conclusions: Although there was no significant difference in the bone cement distribution and early clinical efficacy between KD and OVCF patients under the same surgical plan and surgeon, OVCF patients exhibited better long-term radiologic and clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信