多相动脉自旋标记成像中急性栓塞与动脉粥样硬化性大脑中动脉闭塞的区别

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2024-05-15 Epub Date: 2024-03-04 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0237
Yasuhiro Ito, Taku Sugiyama, Shunsuke Terasaka, Hitoshi Matsuzawa, Kuniaki Harada, Naoki Nakayama, Masaki Ito, Katsuhiko Maruichi, Miki Fujimura
{"title":"多相动脉自旋标记成像中急性栓塞与动脉粥样硬化性大脑中动脉闭塞的区别","authors":"Yasuhiro Ito, Taku Sugiyama, Shunsuke Terasaka, Hitoshi Matsuzawa, Kuniaki Harada, Naoki Nakayama, Masaki Ito, Katsuhiko Maruichi, Miki Fujimura","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arterial spin-labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI) is widely used for evaluating collateral development in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aimed to characterize the findings of multiphase ASL-MRI between embolic and atherosclerotic large vessel occlusion (LVO) to aid in the differential diagnosis. Among 982 patients with AIS, 44 who were diagnosed with acute, symptomatic, and unilateral occlusion of the horizontal segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) were selected and categorized into embolic stroke (ES) and atherosclerosis (AT) groups. Using ASL-MRI (postlabeling delay [PLD] of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 s) at admission, the ipsilateral to contralateral ratio (ICR) of the signal intensity and its time-course increasing rate (from PLD 1.5 to 2.0 and 2.5, ΔICR) were measured and compared between the two groups. The mean ICR was significantly higher in the AT group than in the ES group (AT vs. ES: 0.49 vs. 0.27 for ICR<sub>1.5</sub>, 0.73 vs. 0.32 for ICR<sub>2.0</sub>, and 0.92 vs. 0.37 for ICR<sub>2.5</sub>). The ΔICR of PLD 1.5-2.0 (ΔICR<sub>2.0</sub>) and 2.5 (ΔICR<sub>2.5</sub>) were also significantly higher in the AT group than in the ES group (AT vs. ES: 50.9% vs. 26.3% for ΔICR<sub>2.0</sub>, and 92.6% vs. 42.9% for ΔICR<sub>2.5</sub>). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed moderate-to-strong discriminative abilities of each ASL-MRI parameter in predicting MCA occlusion etiology. In conclusion, multiphase ASL-MRI parameters may aid in differentiating intracranial LVO etiology during the acute phase. Thus, it is applicable to AIS management.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"197-204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences between Acute Embolic and Atherosclerotic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Multiphase Arterial Spin-labeling Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Yasuhiro Ito, Taku Sugiyama, Shunsuke Terasaka, Hitoshi Matsuzawa, Kuniaki Harada, Naoki Nakayama, Masaki Ito, Katsuhiko Maruichi, Miki Fujimura\",\"doi\":\"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Arterial spin-labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI) is widely used for evaluating collateral development in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aimed to characterize the findings of multiphase ASL-MRI between embolic and atherosclerotic large vessel occlusion (LVO) to aid in the differential diagnosis. Among 982 patients with AIS, 44 who were diagnosed with acute, symptomatic, and unilateral occlusion of the horizontal segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) were selected and categorized into embolic stroke (ES) and atherosclerosis (AT) groups. Using ASL-MRI (postlabeling delay [PLD] of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 s) at admission, the ipsilateral to contralateral ratio (ICR) of the signal intensity and its time-course increasing rate (from PLD 1.5 to 2.0 and 2.5, ΔICR) were measured and compared between the two groups. The mean ICR was significantly higher in the AT group than in the ES group (AT vs. ES: 0.49 vs. 0.27 for ICR<sub>1.5</sub>, 0.73 vs. 0.32 for ICR<sub>2.0</sub>, and 0.92 vs. 0.37 for ICR<sub>2.5</sub>). The ΔICR of PLD 1.5-2.0 (ΔICR<sub>2.0</sub>) and 2.5 (ΔICR<sub>2.5</sub>) were also significantly higher in the AT group than in the ES group (AT vs. ES: 50.9% vs. 26.3% for ΔICR<sub>2.0</sub>, and 92.6% vs. 42.9% for ΔICR<sub>2.5</sub>). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed moderate-to-strong discriminative abilities of each ASL-MRI parameter in predicting MCA occlusion etiology. In conclusion, multiphase ASL-MRI parameters may aid in differentiating intracranial LVO etiology during the acute phase. Thus, it is applicable to AIS management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"197-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11153842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0237\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动脉自旋标记磁共振成像(ASL-MRI)被广泛用于评估急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的侧支发育情况。本研究旨在描述栓塞性大血管闭塞(LVO)和动脉粥样硬化性大血管闭塞(LVO)之间的多相 ASL-MRI 结果,以帮助鉴别诊断。在982例AIS患者中,44例被诊断为急性、无症状、单侧大脑中动脉(MCA)水平段闭塞,被分为栓塞性卒中(ES)组和动脉粥样硬化(AT)组。入院时使用 ASL-MRI(标记后延迟[PLD]为 1.5、2.0 和 2.5 秒),测量同侧与对侧信号强度比值(ICR)及其时程增加率(从 PLD 1.5 到 2.0 和 2.5,ΔICR),并对两组进行比较。AT 组的平均 ICR 明显高于 ES 组(AT vs. ES:ICR1.5 为 0.49 vs. 0.27,ICR2.0 为 0.73 vs. 0.32,ICR2.5 为 0.92 vs. 0.37)。AT 组 PLD 1.5-2.0(ΔICR2.0)和 2.5(ΔICR2.5)的ΔICR 也明显高于 ES 组(AT vs. ES:ΔICR2.0 为 50.9% vs. 26.3%,ΔICR2.5 为 92.6% vs. 42.9%)。接收者操作特征曲线显示,ASL-MRI 各参数在预测 MCA 闭塞病因方面具有中等至较强的鉴别能力。总之,多相 ASL-MRI 参数有助于区分急性期颅内 LVO 的病因。因此,它适用于 AIS 的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences between Acute Embolic and Atherosclerotic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Multiphase Arterial Spin-labeling Imaging.

Arterial spin-labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI) is widely used for evaluating collateral development in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aimed to characterize the findings of multiphase ASL-MRI between embolic and atherosclerotic large vessel occlusion (LVO) to aid in the differential diagnosis. Among 982 patients with AIS, 44 who were diagnosed with acute, symptomatic, and unilateral occlusion of the horizontal segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) were selected and categorized into embolic stroke (ES) and atherosclerosis (AT) groups. Using ASL-MRI (postlabeling delay [PLD] of 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 s) at admission, the ipsilateral to contralateral ratio (ICR) of the signal intensity and its time-course increasing rate (from PLD 1.5 to 2.0 and 2.5, ΔICR) were measured and compared between the two groups. The mean ICR was significantly higher in the AT group than in the ES group (AT vs. ES: 0.49 vs. 0.27 for ICR1.5, 0.73 vs. 0.32 for ICR2.0, and 0.92 vs. 0.37 for ICR2.5). The ΔICR of PLD 1.5-2.0 (ΔICR2.0) and 2.5 (ΔICR2.5) were also significantly higher in the AT group than in the ES group (AT vs. ES: 50.9% vs. 26.3% for ΔICR2.0, and 92.6% vs. 42.9% for ΔICR2.5). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed moderate-to-strong discriminative abilities of each ASL-MRI parameter in predicting MCA occlusion etiology. In conclusion, multiphase ASL-MRI parameters may aid in differentiating intracranial LVO etiology during the acute phase. Thus, it is applicable to AIS management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信