雾计算中的区块链共识机制比较:系统性综述

IF 4.1 3区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yehia Ibrahim Alzoubi , Alok Mishra
{"title":"雾计算中的区块链共识机制比较:系统性综述","authors":"Yehia Ibrahim Alzoubi ,&nbsp;Alok Mishra","doi":"10.1016/j.icte.2024.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerous consensus mechanisms have been suggested to cater to the specific characteristics of fog computing. To comprehensively understand their unique features, performance, and applications in fog computing, it is crucial to conduct a systematic analysis of these mechanisms. For this study, 79 relevant articles were carefully selected based on predefined criteria. Among these articles, 35 employed work-proof-based consensus mechanisms, 24 utilized voting-based mechanisms, and 22 adopted capability-based mechanisms. Among the 26 identified consensus mechanisms, proof of work remains the most prevalent one. It is important to note that the scope of this paper is limited to the research available in the predominant databases at the time of writing. Future research may expand to include additional databases and more recent literature in this domain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48526,"journal":{"name":"ICT Express","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 342-373"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405959524000213/pdfft?md5=9f3fb4eed0214fddae565660753ed984&pid=1-s2.0-S2405959524000213-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blockchain consensus mechanisms comparison in fog computing: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Yehia Ibrahim Alzoubi ,&nbsp;Alok Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.icte.2024.02.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Numerous consensus mechanisms have been suggested to cater to the specific characteristics of fog computing. To comprehensively understand their unique features, performance, and applications in fog computing, it is crucial to conduct a systematic analysis of these mechanisms. For this study, 79 relevant articles were carefully selected based on predefined criteria. Among these articles, 35 employed work-proof-based consensus mechanisms, 24 utilized voting-based mechanisms, and 22 adopted capability-based mechanisms. Among the 26 identified consensus mechanisms, proof of work remains the most prevalent one. It is important to note that the scope of this paper is limited to the research available in the predominant databases at the time of writing. Future research may expand to include additional databases and more recent literature in this domain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ICT Express\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 342-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405959524000213/pdfft?md5=9f3fb4eed0214fddae565660753ed984&pid=1-s2.0-S2405959524000213-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ICT Express\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405959524000213\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICT Express","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405959524000213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对雾计算的具体特点,人们提出了许多共识机制。为了全面了解这些机制的独特之处、性能以及在雾计算中的应用,对这些机制进行系统分析至关重要。在本研究中,我们根据预先设定的标准精心挑选了 79 篇相关文章。在这些文章中,35 篇采用了基于工作证明的共识机制,24 篇采用了基于投票的机制,22 篇采用了基于能力的机制。在已确定的 26 种共识机制中,工作证明仍然是最普遍的一种。需要注意的是,本文的研究范围仅限于撰写本文时的主要数据库。未来的研究可能会扩展到该领域的其他数据库和更多最新文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blockchain consensus mechanisms comparison in fog computing: A systematic review

Numerous consensus mechanisms have been suggested to cater to the specific characteristics of fog computing. To comprehensively understand their unique features, performance, and applications in fog computing, it is crucial to conduct a systematic analysis of these mechanisms. For this study, 79 relevant articles were carefully selected based on predefined criteria. Among these articles, 35 employed work-proof-based consensus mechanisms, 24 utilized voting-based mechanisms, and 22 adopted capability-based mechanisms. Among the 26 identified consensus mechanisms, proof of work remains the most prevalent one. It is important to note that the scope of this paper is limited to the research available in the predominant databases at the time of writing. Future research may expand to include additional databases and more recent literature in this domain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ICT Express
ICT Express Multiple-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
1.90%
发文量
167
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊介绍: The ICT Express journal published by the Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences (KICS) is an international, peer-reviewed research publication covering all aspects of information and communication technology. The journal aims to publish research that helps advance the theoretical and practical understanding of ICT convergence, platform technologies, communication networks, and device technologies. The technology advancement in information and communication technology (ICT) sector enables portable devices to be always connected while supporting high data rate, resulting in the recent popularity of smartphones that have a considerable impact in economic and social development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信