有行为问题童年史的青少年对服务效率的看法

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Amanda Paniconi, Alexa Martin-Storey, Michele Déry, René-Marc Lavigne, Melina Tomasiello, Caroline Temcheff
{"title":"有行为问题童年史的青少年对服务效率的看法","authors":"Amanda Paniconi, Alexa Martin-Storey, Michele Déry, René-Marc Lavigne, Melina Tomasiello, Caroline Temcheff","doi":"10.1177/07435584241234643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Services developed to address conduct problems in school contexts show limited efficacy. The current study examined how young adults with childhood histories of conduct problems retrospectively understood service efficacy, inefficacy, and what suggestions they had for service improvement. Participants were 41 young adults from Québec (17–21 years old; 53.7% women; 78% white; 77% below the low-income cut-off for single-person households) who had received services for conduct problems starting in childhood. They completed semi-structured interviews about their service usage experiences. Thematic analysis was used to identify how participants discussed themes relating to efficacy, inefficacy and service improvement. While considerable overlap was observed in how participants and educational professionals understand efficacy (e.g., reduced symptoms) and inefficacy (e.g., worsening symptoms), participants also noted key differences in terms of how they perceived efficacy (i.e., using services to avoid punishment) that are not generally considered by educational professionals. Including user perspectives when assessing service efficacy and inefficacy can provide crucial insight for improving services for youth with conduct problems, providing a starting point for understanding how users evaluate service success, and how they saw services as influencing their psychosocial outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of Service Efficacy Among Young Adults with Childhood Histories of Conduct Problems\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Paniconi, Alexa Martin-Storey, Michele Déry, René-Marc Lavigne, Melina Tomasiello, Caroline Temcheff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07435584241234643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Services developed to address conduct problems in school contexts show limited efficacy. The current study examined how young adults with childhood histories of conduct problems retrospectively understood service efficacy, inefficacy, and what suggestions they had for service improvement. Participants were 41 young adults from Québec (17–21 years old; 53.7% women; 78% white; 77% below the low-income cut-off for single-person households) who had received services for conduct problems starting in childhood. They completed semi-structured interviews about their service usage experiences. Thematic analysis was used to identify how participants discussed themes relating to efficacy, inefficacy and service improvement. While considerable overlap was observed in how participants and educational professionals understand efficacy (e.g., reduced symptoms) and inefficacy (e.g., worsening symptoms), participants also noted key differences in terms of how they perceived efficacy (i.e., using services to avoid punishment) that are not generally considered by educational professionals. Including user perspectives when assessing service efficacy and inefficacy can provide crucial insight for improving services for youth with conduct problems, providing a starting point for understanding how users evaluate service success, and how they saw services as influencing their psychosocial outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescent Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescent Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584241234643\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07435584241234643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为解决学校环境中的行为问题而开发的服务显示出有限的有效性。本研究考察了有童年行为问题史的青少年如何回顾性地理解服务的有效性、无效性,以及他们对改进服务有何建议。研究对象是来自魁北克省的 41 名青少年(17-21 岁;53.7% 为女性;78% 为白人;77% 低于单人家庭低收入分界线),他们从童年开始就因行为问题接受过服务。他们完成了有关其服务使用经历的半结构化访谈。我们采用了主题分析法来确定参与者如何讨论与有效性、无效性和服务改进相关的主题。虽然观察到参与者和教育专业人员在如何理解有效性(如症状减轻)和无效性(如症状恶化)方面有相当多的重叠,但参与者也注意到他们在如何看待有效性(即使用服务来避免惩罚)方面的关键差异,而教育专业人员一般不会考虑这些差异。在评估服务有效性和无效性时纳入使用者的观点,可以为改善针对有行为问题的青少年的服务提供重要的启示,为了解使用者如何评价服务的成功以及他们如何看待服务对其社会心理结果的影响提供一个起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of Service Efficacy Among Young Adults with Childhood Histories of Conduct Problems
Services developed to address conduct problems in school contexts show limited efficacy. The current study examined how young adults with childhood histories of conduct problems retrospectively understood service efficacy, inefficacy, and what suggestions they had for service improvement. Participants were 41 young adults from Québec (17–21 years old; 53.7% women; 78% white; 77% below the low-income cut-off for single-person households) who had received services for conduct problems starting in childhood. They completed semi-structured interviews about their service usage experiences. Thematic analysis was used to identify how participants discussed themes relating to efficacy, inefficacy and service improvement. While considerable overlap was observed in how participants and educational professionals understand efficacy (e.g., reduced symptoms) and inefficacy (e.g., worsening symptoms), participants also noted key differences in terms of how they perceived efficacy (i.e., using services to avoid punishment) that are not generally considered by educational professionals. Including user perspectives when assessing service efficacy and inefficacy can provide crucial insight for improving services for youth with conduct problems, providing a starting point for understanding how users evaluate service success, and how they saw services as influencing their psychosocial outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescent Research
Journal of Adolescent Research PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Adolescent Research is to publish lively, creative, and informative articles on development during adolescence (ages 10-18) and emerging adulthood (ages 18-25). The journal encourages papers that use qualitative, ethnographic, or other methods that present the voices of adolescents. Few strictly quantitative, questionnaire-based articles are published in the Journal of Adolescent Research, unless they break new ground in a previously understudied area. However, papers that combine qualitative and quantitative data are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信