Yousra Kherabi , Michaël Thy , Donia Bouzid , David B. Antcliffe , Timothy Miles Rawson , Nathan Peiffer-Smadja
{"title":"预测抗菌药耐药性的机器学习:未来在临床实践中的应用?","authors":"Yousra Kherabi , Michaël Thy , Donia Bouzid , David B. Antcliffe , Timothy Miles Rawson , Nathan Peiffer-Smadja","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to predict antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This review aims to provide physicians with an overview of the literature on ML as a means of AMR prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>References for this review were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library up to December 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-six studies were included in this review<strong>.</strong> Thirty-two studies (32/36, 89 %) were based on hospital data and four (4/36, 11 %) on outpatient data. The vast majority of them were conducted in high-resource settings (33/36, 92 %). Twenty-four (24/36, 67 %) studies developed systems to predict drug resistance in infected patients, eight (8/36, 22 %) tested the performances of ML-assisted antibiotic prescription, two (2/36, 6 %) assessed ML performances in predicting colonization with carbapenem-resistant bacteria and, finally, two assessed national and international AMR trends. The most common inputs were demographic characteristics (25/36, 70 %), previous antibiotic susceptibility testing (19/36, 53 %) and prior antibiotic exposure (15/36, 42 %). Thirty-three (92 %) studies targeted prediction of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) resistance as an output (92 %). The studies included showed moderate to high performances, with AUROC ranging from 0.56 to 0.93.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ML can potentially provide valuable assistance in AMR prediction. Although the literature on this topic is growing, future studies are needed to design, implement, and evaluate the use and impact of ML decision support systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":"54 3","pages":"Article 104864"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000198/pdfft?md5=319eed89f5174e2313b66e6555d0ba0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000198-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning to predict antimicrobial resistance: future applications in clinical practice?\",\"authors\":\"Yousra Kherabi , Michaël Thy , Donia Bouzid , David B. Antcliffe , Timothy Miles Rawson , Nathan Peiffer-Smadja\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to predict antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This review aims to provide physicians with an overview of the literature on ML as a means of AMR prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>References for this review were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library up to December 2023.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-six studies were included in this review<strong>.</strong> Thirty-two studies (32/36, 89 %) were based on hospital data and four (4/36, 11 %) on outpatient data. The vast majority of them were conducted in high-resource settings (33/36, 92 %). Twenty-four (24/36, 67 %) studies developed systems to predict drug resistance in infected patients, eight (8/36, 22 %) tested the performances of ML-assisted antibiotic prescription, two (2/36, 6 %) assessed ML performances in predicting colonization with carbapenem-resistant bacteria and, finally, two assessed national and international AMR trends. The most common inputs were demographic characteristics (25/36, 70 %), previous antibiotic susceptibility testing (19/36, 53 %) and prior antibiotic exposure (15/36, 42 %). Thirty-three (92 %) studies targeted prediction of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) resistance as an output (92 %). The studies included showed moderate to high performances, with AUROC ranging from 0.56 to 0.93.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>ML can potentially provide valuable assistance in AMR prediction. Although the literature on this topic is growing, future studies are needed to design, implement, and evaluate the use and impact of ML decision support systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious diseases now\",\"volume\":\"54 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 104864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000198/pdfft?md5=319eed89f5174e2313b66e6555d0ba0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000198-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious diseases now\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:机器学习(ML)越来越多地被用于预测抗菌药耐药性(AMR)。本综述旨在为医生提供有关 ML 作为 AMR 预测手段的文献概览:方法:通过检索 MEDLINE/PubMed、EMBASE、Google Scholar、ACM 数字图书馆和 IEEE Xplore 数字图书馆(截至 2023 年 12 月),确定了本综述的参考文献:本综述共纳入 36 项研究。其中 32 项研究(32/36,89%)基于医院数据,4 项研究(4/36,11%)基于门诊数据。其中绝大多数是在高资源环境中进行的(33/36,92%)。24项研究(24/36,67%)开发了预测感染患者耐药性的系统,8项研究(n=8/36,22%)测试了ML辅助抗生素处方的性能,2项研究(n=2/36,6%)评估了ML在预测耐碳青霉烯细菌定植方面的性能,最后,2项研究评估了国内和国际AMR趋势。最常见的输入是人口统计学特征(25/36,70%)、既往抗生素药敏试验(19/36,53%)和既往抗生素暴露(15/36,42%)。有 33 项(92%)研究将革兰氏阴性菌 (GNB) 耐药性预测作为输出结果(92%)。所纳入的研究显示出中等到较高的性能,AUROC 从 0.56 到 0.93 不等:结论:ML 有可能为 AMR 预测提供有价值的帮助。结论:ML 有可能为 AMR 预测提供有价值的帮助。尽管有关该主题的文献越来越多,但未来仍需开展研究,以设计、实施和评估 ML 决策支持系统的使用和影响。
Machine learning to predict antimicrobial resistance: future applications in clinical practice?
Introduction
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly being used to predict antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This review aims to provide physicians with an overview of the literature on ML as a means of AMR prediction.
Methods
References for this review were identified through searches of MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, and IEEE Xplore Digital Library up to December 2023.
Results
Thirty-six studies were included in this review. Thirty-two studies (32/36, 89 %) were based on hospital data and four (4/36, 11 %) on outpatient data. The vast majority of them were conducted in high-resource settings (33/36, 92 %). Twenty-four (24/36, 67 %) studies developed systems to predict drug resistance in infected patients, eight (8/36, 22 %) tested the performances of ML-assisted antibiotic prescription, two (2/36, 6 %) assessed ML performances in predicting colonization with carbapenem-resistant bacteria and, finally, two assessed national and international AMR trends. The most common inputs were demographic characteristics (25/36, 70 %), previous antibiotic susceptibility testing (19/36, 53 %) and prior antibiotic exposure (15/36, 42 %). Thirty-three (92 %) studies targeted prediction of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) resistance as an output (92 %). The studies included showed moderate to high performances, with AUROC ranging from 0.56 to 0.93.
Conclusion
ML can potentially provide valuable assistance in AMR prediction. Although the literature on this topic is growing, future studies are needed to design, implement, and evaluate the use and impact of ML decision support systems.