印度尼西亚医科学生使用实际大小的婴儿人体模型进行免疫模拟:一项准实验研究。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hartono Gunardi, Angga Wirahmadi, Bernie Endyarni Medise, Rini Sekartini, Dina Muktiarti, Ardi Findyartini, Muhammad Hanif Nadhif, Agaprita E Sirait, Soedjatmiko Soedjatmiko, Jeslyn Tengkawan
{"title":"印度尼西亚医科学生使用实际大小的婴儿人体模型进行免疫模拟:一项准实验研究。","authors":"Hartono Gunardi, Angga Wirahmadi, Bernie Endyarni Medise, Rini Sekartini, Dina Muktiarti, Ardi Findyartini, Muhammad Hanif Nadhif, Agaprita E Sirait, Soedjatmiko Soedjatmiko, Jeslyn Tengkawan","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Manikins are tools used in simulation training for medical students to develop important skills, one of which is immunization. However, conventional manikins often do not resemble the actual size of an infant's arm or leg. This study aimed to determine the impact of using actual-size manikins on students' knowledge and practical skills, evaluate their confidence in immunization practice, and assess students' responses and feedback regarding the practice using actual-size manikins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quasi-experimental study involving medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, from October 2020 to April 2021. Students in the intervention group used newly developed actual-size infant arm and leg manikins, while the control group used conventional manikins. All students underwent the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and the scores were compared between the 2 groups. Within the intervention group, data on pretest and posttest scores, feedback questionnaires, and self-confidence assessments were also obtained and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 students were included. Statistically significant difference was found in the OSCE scores between the intervention and control groups ( P < 0.01). Students in the intervention group (n = 108) showed significant improvement in knowledge scores after the workshop ( P < 0.01). Most students (81.7%) expressed confidence in administering vaccines to live patients after practicing with manikins. In addition, 98.2% of students (n = 107) acknowledged the benefits of practicing with actual-size manikins in accurately determining the injection sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation with the actual-size manikins significantly improved students' knowledge and practical immunization skills, leading to increased confidence and competence in their immunization skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"350-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunization Simulation Using Actual-Size Infant Manikins for Medical Students in Indonesia: A Quasi-Experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hartono Gunardi, Angga Wirahmadi, Bernie Endyarni Medise, Rini Sekartini, Dina Muktiarti, Ardi Findyartini, Muhammad Hanif Nadhif, Agaprita E Sirait, Soedjatmiko Soedjatmiko, Jeslyn Tengkawan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Manikins are tools used in simulation training for medical students to develop important skills, one of which is immunization. However, conventional manikins often do not resemble the actual size of an infant's arm or leg. This study aimed to determine the impact of using actual-size manikins on students' knowledge and practical skills, evaluate their confidence in immunization practice, and assess students' responses and feedback regarding the practice using actual-size manikins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a quasi-experimental study involving medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, from October 2020 to April 2021. Students in the intervention group used newly developed actual-size infant arm and leg manikins, while the control group used conventional manikins. All students underwent the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and the scores were compared between the 2 groups. Within the intervention group, data on pretest and posttest scores, feedback questionnaires, and self-confidence assessments were also obtained and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 205 students were included. Statistically significant difference was found in the OSCE scores between the intervention and control groups ( P < 0.01). Students in the intervention group (n = 108) showed significant improvement in knowledge scores after the workshop ( P < 0.01). Most students (81.7%) expressed confidence in administering vaccines to live patients after practicing with manikins. In addition, 98.2% of students (n = 107) acknowledged the benefits of practicing with actual-size manikins in accurately determining the injection sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Simulation with the actual-size manikins significantly improved students' knowledge and practical immunization skills, leading to increased confidence and competence in their immunization skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"350-357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000782\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000782","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:人体模型是模拟训练的工具,用于培养医学生的重要技能,免疫接种就是其中之一。然而,传统的人体模型通常与婴儿手臂或腿部的实际尺寸不符。本研究旨在确定使用实际大小的人体模型对学生知识和实践技能的影响,评估他们在免疫接种实践中的信心,并评估学生对使用实际大小的人体模型进行实践的反应和反馈:这是一项准实验研究,涉及印度尼西亚大学医学系的医科学生,研究时间为 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 4 月。干预组的学生使用新开发的实际大小的婴儿手臂和腿部人体模型,而对照组则使用传统的人体模型。所有学生都接受了客观结构化临床检查(OSCE),并对两组学生的得分进行了比较。在干预组中,还获得并分析了前测和后测分数、反馈问卷和自信心评估数据:共有 205 名学生被纳入干预组。干预组和对照组的 OSCE 分数有明显的统计学差异(P < 0.01)。干预组(108 人)的学生在工作坊后的知识得分有明显提高(P < 0.01)。大多数学生(81.7%)在使用人体模型练习后表示有信心为活体患者接种疫苗。此外,98.2%的学生(n = 107)承认使用实际大小的人体模型进行练习有利于准确确定注射部位:结论:使用实际大小的人体模型进行模拟练习能明显提高学生的免疫接种知识和实践技能,从而增强他们对免疫接种技能的信心并提高他们的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immunization Simulation Using Actual-Size Infant Manikins for Medical Students in Indonesia: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Introduction: Manikins are tools used in simulation training for medical students to develop important skills, one of which is immunization. However, conventional manikins often do not resemble the actual size of an infant's arm or leg. This study aimed to determine the impact of using actual-size manikins on students' knowledge and practical skills, evaluate their confidence in immunization practice, and assess students' responses and feedback regarding the practice using actual-size manikins.

Methods: This was a quasi-experimental study involving medical students at the Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, from October 2020 to April 2021. Students in the intervention group used newly developed actual-size infant arm and leg manikins, while the control group used conventional manikins. All students underwent the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and the scores were compared between the 2 groups. Within the intervention group, data on pretest and posttest scores, feedback questionnaires, and self-confidence assessments were also obtained and analyzed.

Results: A total of 205 students were included. Statistically significant difference was found in the OSCE scores between the intervention and control groups ( P < 0.01). Students in the intervention group (n = 108) showed significant improvement in knowledge scores after the workshop ( P < 0.01). Most students (81.7%) expressed confidence in administering vaccines to live patients after practicing with manikins. In addition, 98.2% of students (n = 107) acknowledged the benefits of practicing with actual-size manikins in accurately determining the injection sites.

Conclusions: Simulation with the actual-size manikins significantly improved students' knowledge and practical immunization skills, leading to increased confidence and competence in their immunization skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信