透视引导下腰椎层间硬膜外类固醇注射的对侧斜视和侧视辐射剂量比较。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-02-01
Yucel Olgun, Rekib Sacaklidir, Serdar Kokar, Savas Sencan, Osman Hakan Gunduz
{"title":"透视引导下腰椎层间硬膜外类固醇注射的对侧斜视和侧视辐射剂量比较。","authors":"Yucel Olgun, Rekib Sacaklidir, Serdar Kokar, Savas Sencan, Osman Hakan Gunduz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite newly developing technologies and techniques, the use of fluoroscopic guidance in spinal interventional treatments remains popular. Therefore, it is essential to set reference standards and techniques for reducing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided procedures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was is to compare the radiation doses and procedure time of the contralateral oblique (CLO) view to  lateral view imaging during fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pain management unit of a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An evaluation of patients who received epidural steroid injections between May 2021 and May 2023 in a university hospital interventional pain management center was performed. This observational study was conducted with 248 patients aged 18 and older who underwent lumbar interlaminar epidural injections (ILESI) confirmed by CLO or lateral oblique imaging. The primary outcomes were the comparison of radiation dose and procedure time between the 2 groups. The secondary outcome was the comparison of complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, diagnosis, body mass index, procedure level, Numeric Rating Scale, and procedure time. Although the radiation dose was lower in the CLO group, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. However, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of complications (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study was designed in a single center and performing all the procedures with the same fluoroscopy device makes it difficult to generalize our results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was no difference in terms of radiation dose and duration of procedure between lumbar ILESI conducting using the CLO or lateral view fluoroscopy imaging, there was a significant difference in terms of complications. Therefore, conducting lumbar ILESI using a CLO view minimizes the complication rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Radiation Doses of Contralateral Oblique and Lateral View for Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection.\",\"authors\":\"Yucel Olgun, Rekib Sacaklidir, Serdar Kokar, Savas Sencan, Osman Hakan Gunduz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite newly developing technologies and techniques, the use of fluoroscopic guidance in spinal interventional treatments remains popular. Therefore, it is essential to set reference standards and techniques for reducing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided procedures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was is to compare the radiation doses and procedure time of the contralateral oblique (CLO) view to  lateral view imaging during fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pain management unit of a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An evaluation of patients who received epidural steroid injections between May 2021 and May 2023 in a university hospital interventional pain management center was performed. This observational study was conducted with 248 patients aged 18 and older who underwent lumbar interlaminar epidural injections (ILESI) confirmed by CLO or lateral oblique imaging. The primary outcomes were the comparison of radiation dose and procedure time between the 2 groups. The secondary outcome was the comparison of complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, diagnosis, body mass index, procedure level, Numeric Rating Scale, and procedure time. Although the radiation dose was lower in the CLO group, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. However, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of complications (P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The study was designed in a single center and performing all the procedures with the same fluoroscopy device makes it difficult to generalize our results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although there was no difference in terms of radiation dose and duration of procedure between lumbar ILESI conducting using the CLO or lateral view fluoroscopy imaging, there was a significant difference in terms of complications. Therefore, conducting lumbar ILESI using a CLO view minimizes the complication rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain physician\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管新技术和新工艺不断发展,但在脊柱介入治疗中使用透视引导仍很流行。因此,制定参考标准和技术以减少透视引导手术中的辐射暴露至关重要:本研究旨在比较透视引导下脊柱手术中对侧斜视(CLO)和侧视成像的辐射剂量和手术时间:研究设计:回顾性研究:研究设计:一项回顾性研究:对 2021 年 5 月至 2023 年 5 月期间在一家大学医院介入疼痛治疗中心接受硬膜外类固醇注射的患者进行评估。这项观察性研究的对象是 248 名年龄在 18 岁及以上、接受腰椎层间硬膜外注射(ILESI)并经 CLO 或侧斜位成像确认的患者。主要结果是比较两组的辐射剂量和手术时间。次要结果是并发症发生率的比较:结果:两组患者在年龄、性别、诊断、体重指数、手术级别、数字评分量表和手术时间方面无明显差异。虽然 CLO 组的辐射剂量较低,但两组之间无明显差异。然而,两组在并发症方面有明显差异(P < 0.001):局限性:本研究是在一个中心进行的,而且所有手术均使用相同的透视设备,因此很难将我们的结果一概而论:尽管使用CLO或侧视透视成像进行腰椎ILESI手术在辐射剂量和手术持续时间方面没有差异,但在并发症方面却存在显著差异。因此,使用 CLO 视图进行腰椎内固定术可将并发症发生率降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Radiation Doses of Contralateral Oblique and Lateral View for Fluoroscopy-Guided Lumbar Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection.

Background: Despite newly developing technologies and techniques, the use of fluoroscopic guidance in spinal interventional treatments remains popular. Therefore, it is essential to set reference standards and techniques for reducing radiation exposure in fluoroscopy-guided procedures.

Objective: The aim of this study was is to compare the radiation doses and procedure time of the contralateral oblique (CLO) view to  lateral view imaging during fluoroscopy-guided spinal procedures.

Study design: A retrospective study.

Setting: Pain management unit of a tertiary care center.

Methods: An evaluation of patients who received epidural steroid injections between May 2021 and May 2023 in a university hospital interventional pain management center was performed. This observational study was conducted with 248 patients aged 18 and older who underwent lumbar interlaminar epidural injections (ILESI) confirmed by CLO or lateral oblique imaging. The primary outcomes were the comparison of radiation dose and procedure time between the 2 groups. The secondary outcome was the comparison of complication rates.

Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, gender, diagnosis, body mass index, procedure level, Numeric Rating Scale, and procedure time. Although the radiation dose was lower in the CLO group, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. However, there was a significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of complications (P < 0.001).

Limitations: The study was designed in a single center and performing all the procedures with the same fluoroscopy device makes it difficult to generalize our results.

Conclusions: Although there was no difference in terms of radiation dose and duration of procedure between lumbar ILESI conducting using the CLO or lateral view fluoroscopy imaging, there was a significant difference in terms of complications. Therefore, conducting lumbar ILESI using a CLO view minimizes the complication rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信