青少年易怒、愤怒和攻击行为评估的最新证据基础。

IF 4.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Spencer C Evans, Ashley R Karlovich, Sakshi Khurana, Audrey Edelman, Bianca Buza, William Riddle, Denise López Sosa
{"title":"青少年易怒、愤怒和攻击行为评估的最新证据基础。","authors":"Spencer C Evans, Ashley R Karlovich, Sakshi Khurana, Audrey Edelman, Bianca Buza, William Riddle, Denise López Sosa","doi":"10.1080/15374416.2023.2292041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Irritability, anger, and aggression have garnered significant attention from youth mental health researchers and clinicians; however, fundamental challenges of conceptualization and measurement persist. This article reviews the evidence base for assessing these transdiagnostic constructs in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a preregistered systematic review of the evidence behind instruments used to measure irritability, anger, aggression, and related problems in youth. Searches were conducted in PsycINFO and PubMed, identifying 4,664 unique articles. Eligibility criteria focused on self- and proxy-report measures with peer-reviewed psychometric evidence from studies in English with youths ages 3-18. Additional measures were found through ancillary search strategies (e.g. book chapters, review articles, test publishers). Measures were screened and coded by multiple raters with acceptable reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 68 instruments met criteria for inclusion, with scales covering irritability (<i>n</i> = 15), anger (<i>n</i> = 19), aggression (<i>n</i> = 45), and/or general overt externalizing problems (<i>n</i> = 27). Regarding overall psychometric support, 6 measures (8.8%) were classified as Excellent, 46 (67.6%) were Good, and 16 (23.5%) were Adequate. Descriptive information (e.g. informants, scales, availability, translations) and psychometric properties (e.g. reliability, validity, norms) are summarized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Numerous instruments for youth irritability, anger, and aggression exist with varying degrees of empirical support for specific applications. Although some measures were especially strong, none had uniformly excellent properties across all dimensions, signaling the need for further research in particular areas. Findings promote conceptual clarity while also producing a well-characterized toolkit for researchers and clinicians addressing transdiagnostic problems affecting youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":48350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"277-308"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence Base Update on the Assessment of Irritability, Anger, and Aggression in Youth.\",\"authors\":\"Spencer C Evans, Ashley R Karlovich, Sakshi Khurana, Audrey Edelman, Bianca Buza, William Riddle, Denise López Sosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15374416.2023.2292041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Irritability, anger, and aggression have garnered significant attention from youth mental health researchers and clinicians; however, fundamental challenges of conceptualization and measurement persist. This article reviews the evidence base for assessing these transdiagnostic constructs in children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a preregistered systematic review of the evidence behind instruments used to measure irritability, anger, aggression, and related problems in youth. Searches were conducted in PsycINFO and PubMed, identifying 4,664 unique articles. Eligibility criteria focused on self- and proxy-report measures with peer-reviewed psychometric evidence from studies in English with youths ages 3-18. Additional measures were found through ancillary search strategies (e.g. book chapters, review articles, test publishers). Measures were screened and coded by multiple raters with acceptable reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 68 instruments met criteria for inclusion, with scales covering irritability (<i>n</i> = 15), anger (<i>n</i> = 19), aggression (<i>n</i> = 45), and/or general overt externalizing problems (<i>n</i> = 27). Regarding overall psychometric support, 6 measures (8.8%) were classified as Excellent, 46 (67.6%) were Good, and 16 (23.5%) were Adequate. Descriptive information (e.g. informants, scales, availability, translations) and psychometric properties (e.g. reliability, validity, norms) are summarized.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Numerous instruments for youth irritability, anger, and aggression exist with varying degrees of empirical support for specific applications. Although some measures were especially strong, none had uniformly excellent properties across all dimensions, signaling the need for further research in particular areas. Findings promote conceptual clarity while also producing a well-characterized toolkit for researchers and clinicians addressing transdiagnostic problems affecting youth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"277-308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042996/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2023.2292041\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2023.2292041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:易怒、愤怒和攻击性已引起青少年心理健康研究人员和临床医生的极大关注;然而,概念化和测量方面的基本挑战依然存在。本文回顾了评估儿童和青少年这些跨诊断结构的证据基础:我们对用于测量青少年易怒、愤怒、攻击性及相关问题的工具背后的证据进行了预先登记的系统性回顾。我们在 PsycINFO 和 PubMed 上进行了搜索,共发现 4,664 篇文章。符合条件的文章主要是针对 3-18 岁青少年用英语进行的研究中具有同行评审心理测量学证据的自我报告和代理报告测量方法。此外,还通过辅助搜索策略(如书籍章节、评论文章、测试出版商)找到了其他测量方法。测量方法由多名具有可接受可靠性的评定者进行筛选和编码:总体而言,68 项工具符合纳入标准,量表涵盖易怒(n = 15)、愤怒(n = 19)、攻击性(n = 45)和/或一般明显的外化问题(n = 27)。在总体心理测量支持方面,6 项测量(8.8%)被评为 "优秀",46 项(67.6%)被评为 "良好",16 项(23.5%)被评为 "合格"。总结了描述性信息(如信息提供者、量表、可用性、翻译)和心理测量特性(如信度、效度、常模):针对青少年易怒、愤怒和攻击行为的工具有很多,但在具体应用中都得到了不同程度的实证支持。尽管有些测量方法特别有效,但没有一种测量方法在所有维度上都具有一致的优良特性,这表明需要在特定领域开展进一步的研究。研究结果促进了概念的清晰化,同时也为研究人员和临床医生解决影响青少年的跨诊断问题提供了一个特征明确的工具包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence Base Update on the Assessment of Irritability, Anger, and Aggression in Youth.

Objective: Irritability, anger, and aggression have garnered significant attention from youth mental health researchers and clinicians; however, fundamental challenges of conceptualization and measurement persist. This article reviews the evidence base for assessing these transdiagnostic constructs in children and adolescents.

Method: We conducted a preregistered systematic review of the evidence behind instruments used to measure irritability, anger, aggression, and related problems in youth. Searches were conducted in PsycINFO and PubMed, identifying 4,664 unique articles. Eligibility criteria focused on self- and proxy-report measures with peer-reviewed psychometric evidence from studies in English with youths ages 3-18. Additional measures were found through ancillary search strategies (e.g. book chapters, review articles, test publishers). Measures were screened and coded by multiple raters with acceptable reliability.

Results: Overall, 68 instruments met criteria for inclusion, with scales covering irritability (n = 15), anger (n = 19), aggression (n = 45), and/or general overt externalizing problems (n = 27). Regarding overall psychometric support, 6 measures (8.8%) were classified as Excellent, 46 (67.6%) were Good, and 16 (23.5%) were Adequate. Descriptive information (e.g. informants, scales, availability, translations) and psychometric properties (e.g. reliability, validity, norms) are summarized.

Conclusions: Numerous instruments for youth irritability, anger, and aggression exist with varying degrees of empirical support for specific applications. Although some measures were especially strong, none had uniformly excellent properties across all dimensions, signaling the need for further research in particular areas. Findings promote conceptual clarity while also producing a well-characterized toolkit for researchers and clinicians addressing transdiagnostic problems affecting youth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology (JCCAP) is the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association. It publishes original contributions on the following topics: (a) the development and evaluation of assessment and intervention techniques for use with clinical child and adolescent populations; (b) the development and maintenance of clinical child and adolescent problems; (c) cross-cultural and sociodemographic issues that have a clear bearing on clinical child and adolescent psychology in terms of theory, research, or practice; and (d) training and professional practice in clinical child and adolescent psychology, as well as child advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信