现场笔记从来都不是真正的 "原始 "数据:分析伦敦南岸公共空间的社会生活

IF 1.6 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Area Pub Date : 2024-01-12 DOI:10.1111/area.12920
Alasdair Jones
{"title":"现场笔记从来都不是真正的 \"原始 \"数据:分析伦敦南岸公共空间的社会生活","authors":"Alasdair Jones","doi":"10.1111/area.12920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Unlike for other forms of qualitative data, examples of how fieldnotes are analysed are rarely provided in the literature. Using fieldnotes from my ethnographic study of the production of public space on London's South Bank as a starting point, this paper considers why this might be the case. In particular, the paper argues that for fieldnote-based research, analysis is a feature of note-taking, rather than a discrete phase of activity conducted using our fieldnotes once they have been collected. In this vein, the paper encourages researchers to be aware of the analytical <i>in</i> their fieldnotes, and to be open to the ways that analysis inside the notebook can help us identify salient objects of enquiry in our work.</p>","PeriodicalId":8422,"journal":{"name":"Area","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/area.12920","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fieldnotes as never really ‘raw’ data: Analysing the social life of public space on London's South Bank\",\"authors\":\"Alasdair Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/area.12920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Unlike for other forms of qualitative data, examples of how fieldnotes are analysed are rarely provided in the literature. Using fieldnotes from my ethnographic study of the production of public space on London's South Bank as a starting point, this paper considers why this might be the case. In particular, the paper argues that for fieldnote-based research, analysis is a feature of note-taking, rather than a discrete phase of activity conducted using our fieldnotes once they have been collected. In this vein, the paper encourages researchers to be aware of the analytical <i>in</i> their fieldnotes, and to be open to the ways that analysis inside the notebook can help us identify salient objects of enquiry in our work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Area\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/area.12920\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Area\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/area.12920\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/area.12920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与其他形式的定性数据不同,文献中很少提供如何分析田野笔记的实例。本文以我对伦敦南岸公共空间生产的人种学研究中的田野笔记为出发点,探讨了为什么会出现这种情况。本文特别指出,对于基于田野笔记的研究而言,分析是笔记的一个特征,而不是在收集到田野笔记后利用笔记开展活动的一个独立阶段。因此,本文鼓励研究人员关注其田野笔记中的分析性内容,并以开放的态度看待笔记本中的分析如何帮助我们确定工作中的突出调查对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fieldnotes as never really ‘raw’ data: Analysing the social life of public space on London's South Bank

Fieldnotes as never really ‘raw’ data: Analysing the social life of public space on London's South Bank

Unlike for other forms of qualitative data, examples of how fieldnotes are analysed are rarely provided in the literature. Using fieldnotes from my ethnographic study of the production of public space on London's South Bank as a starting point, this paper considers why this might be the case. In particular, the paper argues that for fieldnote-based research, analysis is a feature of note-taking, rather than a discrete phase of activity conducted using our fieldnotes once they have been collected. In this vein, the paper encourages researchers to be aware of the analytical in their fieldnotes, and to be open to the ways that analysis inside the notebook can help us identify salient objects of enquiry in our work.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Area
Area GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Area publishes ground breaking geographical research and scholarship across the field of geography. Whatever your interests, reading Area is essential to keep up with the latest thinking in geography. At the cutting edge of the discipline, the journal: • is the debating forum for the latest geographical research and ideas • is an outlet for fresh ideas, from both established and new scholars • is accessible to new researchers, including postgraduate students and academics at an early stage in their careers • contains commentaries and debates that focus on topical issues, new research results, methodological theory and practice and academic discussion and debate • provides rapid publication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信