对 22q11.2 缺失综合征患者进行宾大计算机化神经认知电池远程评估。

IF 2.1 2区医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Pub Date : 2024-01-16 DOI:10.1111/jir.13115

L. K. White, N. Hillman, K. Ruparel, T. M. Moore, R. S. Gallagher, E. J. McClellan, D. R. Roalf, J. C. Scott, M. E. Calkins, D. E. McGinn, V. Giunta, O. Tran, T. B. Crowley, E. H. Zackai, B. S. Emanuel, D. M. McDonald-McGinn, R. E. Gur, R. C. Gur

{"title":"对 22q11.2 缺失综合征患者进行宾大计算机化神经认知电池远程评估。","authors":"L. K. White, N. Hillman, K. Ruparel, T. M. Moore, R. S. Gallagher, E. J. McClellan, D. R. Roalf, J. C. Scott, M. E. Calkins, D. E. McGinn, V. Giunta, O. Tran, T. B. Crowley, E. H. Zackai, B. S. Emanuel, D. M. McDonald-McGinn, R. E. Gur, R. C. Gur","doi":"10.1111/jir.13115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Neurocognitive functioning is an integral phenotype of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome relating to severity of psychopathology and outcomes. A neurocognitive battery that could be administered remotely to assess multiple cognitive domains would be especially beneficial to research on rare genetic variants, where in-person assessment can be unavailable or burdensome. The current study compares in-person and remote assessments of the Penn computerised neurocognitive battery (CNB).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Participants (mean age = 17.82, SD = 6.94 years; 48% female) completed the CNB either in-person at a laboratory (<i>n</i> = 222) or remotely (<i>n</i> = 162).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Results show that accuracy of CNB performance was equivalent across the two testing locations, while slight differences in speed were detected in 3 of the 11 tasks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings suggest that the CNB can be used in remote settings to assess multiple neurocognitive domains.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remote assessment of the Penn computerised neurocognitive battery in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome\",\"authors\":\"L. K. White, N. Hillman, K. Ruparel, T. M. Moore, R. S. Gallagher, E. J. McClellan, D. R. Roalf, J. C. Scott, M. E. Calkins, D. E. McGinn, V. Giunta, O. Tran, T. B. Crowley, E. H. Zackai, B. S. Emanuel, D. M. McDonald-McGinn, R. E. Gur, R. C. Gur\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.13115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Neurocognitive functioning is an integral phenotype of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome relating to severity of psychopathology and outcomes. A neurocognitive battery that could be administered remotely to assess multiple cognitive domains would be especially beneficial to research on rare genetic variants, where in-person assessment can be unavailable or burdensome. The current study compares in-person and remote assessments of the Penn computerised neurocognitive battery (CNB).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Participants (mean age = 17.82, SD = 6.94 years; 48% female) completed the CNB either in-person at a laboratory (<i>n</i> = 222) or remotely (<i>n</i> = 162).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Results show that accuracy of CNB performance was equivalent across the two testing locations, while slight differences in speed were detected in 3 of the 11 tasks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>These findings suggest that the CNB can be used in remote settings to assess multiple neurocognitive domains.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13115\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

背景：神经认知功能是 22q11.2 缺失综合征的一个重要表型，与精神病理学的严重程度和预后有关。在无法进行亲身评估或亲身评估负担沉重的情况下，一种可远程管理的神经认知电池来评估多个认知领域尤其有利于罕见基因变异的研究。本研究比较了宾大计算机化神经认知电池（CNB）的现场评估和远程评估：参与者（平均年龄 = 17.82 岁，SD = 6.94 岁；48% 为女性）在实验室亲自完成 CNB（n = 222）或远程完成 CNB（n = 162）：结果表明，两个测试地点的 CNB 准确度相当，而在 11 项任务中，有 3 项任务的速度略有差异：这些研究结果表明，CNB 可以在远程环境中用于评估多个神经认知领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Remote assessment of the Penn computerised neurocognitive battery in individuals with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Background

Neurocognitive functioning is an integral phenotype of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome relating to severity of psychopathology and outcomes. A neurocognitive battery that could be administered remotely to assess multiple cognitive domains would be especially beneficial to research on rare genetic variants, where in-person assessment can be unavailable or burdensome. The current study compares in-person and remote assessments of the Penn computerised neurocognitive battery (CNB).

Methods

Participants (mean age = 17.82, SD = 6.94 years; 48% female) completed the CNB either in-person at a laboratory (n = 222) or remotely (n = 162).

Results

Results show that accuracy of CNB performance was equivalent across the two testing locations, while slight differences in speed were detected in 3 of the 11 tasks.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the CNB can be used in remote settings to assess multiple neurocognitive domains.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Intellectual Disability Research Multiple-

CiteScore

5.60

自引率

5.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.