{"title":"利用发作间期颅内脑电图得出的兴奋和抑制活动作为潜在的致痫生物标志物","authors":"Keisuke Nagata, Naoto Kunii, Seijiro Shimada, Nobuhito Saito","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epileptogenic zones (EZs), where epileptic seizures cease after resection, are localized by assessing the seizure-onset zone using ictal electroencephalography (EEG). Owing to the difficulty in capturing unpredictable seizures, biomarkers capable of identifying EZs from interictal EEG are anticipated. Recent studies using intracranial EEG have identified several potential candidate biomarkers for epileptogenicity. High-frequency oscillation (HFO) was initially expected to be a robust biomarker of abnormal excitatory activity in the ictogenic region. However, HFO-guided resection failed to improve seizure prognosis. Meanwhile, the regularity of low-gamma oscillations (30-80 Hz) indicates inhibitory interneurons' hypersynchronization, which could be used to localize the EZ. Besides resting-state EEG assessments, evoked potentials elicited by single-pulse electrical stimulation, such as corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEP), became valuable tools for assessing epileptogenic regions. CCEP responses recorded in the cortex remote from the stimulation site indicate functional connectivity, revealing increased internal connectivity within the ictogenic region and elevated inhibitory input from the non-involved regions to the ictogenic region. Conversely, large responses close to the stimulation site reflect local excitability, manifesting as an increased N1 amplitude and overriding HFO. Further research is required to establish whether these novel electrophysiological methods, either individually or in combination, can function as robust biomarkers of epileptogenicity and hold promise for improving seizure prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"65-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10918453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing Excitatory and Inhibitory Activity Derived from Interictal Intracranial Electroencephalography as Potential Biomarkers for Epileptogenicity.\",\"authors\":\"Keisuke Nagata, Naoto Kunii, Seijiro Shimada, Nobuhito Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Epileptogenic zones (EZs), where epileptic seizures cease after resection, are localized by assessing the seizure-onset zone using ictal electroencephalography (EEG). Owing to the difficulty in capturing unpredictable seizures, biomarkers capable of identifying EZs from interictal EEG are anticipated. Recent studies using intracranial EEG have identified several potential candidate biomarkers for epileptogenicity. High-frequency oscillation (HFO) was initially expected to be a robust biomarker of abnormal excitatory activity in the ictogenic region. However, HFO-guided resection failed to improve seizure prognosis. Meanwhile, the regularity of low-gamma oscillations (30-80 Hz) indicates inhibitory interneurons' hypersynchronization, which could be used to localize the EZ. Besides resting-state EEG assessments, evoked potentials elicited by single-pulse electrical stimulation, such as corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEP), became valuable tools for assessing epileptogenic regions. CCEP responses recorded in the cortex remote from the stimulation site indicate functional connectivity, revealing increased internal connectivity within the ictogenic region and elevated inhibitory input from the non-involved regions to the ictogenic region. Conversely, large responses close to the stimulation site reflect local excitability, manifesting as an increased N1 amplitude and overriding HFO. Further research is required to establish whether these novel electrophysiological methods, either individually or in combination, can function as robust biomarkers of epileptogenicity and hold promise for improving seizure prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"65-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10918453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0207\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2023-0207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
致痫区(EZs)是切除术后癫痫发作停止的地方,通过使用发作间期脑电图(EEG)评估癫痫发作起始区来定位致痫区。由于难以捕捉不可预测的癫痫发作,人们期待能够从发作间期脑电图中识别 EZ 的生物标记物。最近利用颅内脑电图进行的研究发现了几种潜在的致痫性候选生物标志物。高频振荡(HFO)最初被认为是致痫区异常兴奋活动的可靠生物标志物。然而,高频振荡引导的切除术未能改善癫痫发作的预后。同时,低伽马振荡(30-80 Hz)的规律性表明抑制性中间神经元的超同步性,可用于定位 EZ。除了静息状态脑电图评估外,单脉冲电刺激诱发的诱发电位(如皮质诱发电位(CCEP))也成为评估致痫区的重要工具。在远离刺激部位的皮层记录到的 CCEP 反应可显示功能连接性,揭示致痫区内部连接性增强,以及非受累区对致痫区的抑制性输入增强。相反,靠近刺激部位的大反应反映了局部兴奋性,表现为 N1 振幅增大和高于 HFO。要确定这些新颖的电生理方法(无论是单独使用还是结合使用)是否能作为致痫性的可靠生物标志物,并有望改善癫痫发作的预后,还需要进一步的研究。
Utilizing Excitatory and Inhibitory Activity Derived from Interictal Intracranial Electroencephalography as Potential Biomarkers for Epileptogenicity.
Epileptogenic zones (EZs), where epileptic seizures cease after resection, are localized by assessing the seizure-onset zone using ictal electroencephalography (EEG). Owing to the difficulty in capturing unpredictable seizures, biomarkers capable of identifying EZs from interictal EEG are anticipated. Recent studies using intracranial EEG have identified several potential candidate biomarkers for epileptogenicity. High-frequency oscillation (HFO) was initially expected to be a robust biomarker of abnormal excitatory activity in the ictogenic region. However, HFO-guided resection failed to improve seizure prognosis. Meanwhile, the regularity of low-gamma oscillations (30-80 Hz) indicates inhibitory interneurons' hypersynchronization, which could be used to localize the EZ. Besides resting-state EEG assessments, evoked potentials elicited by single-pulse electrical stimulation, such as corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEP), became valuable tools for assessing epileptogenic regions. CCEP responses recorded in the cortex remote from the stimulation site indicate functional connectivity, revealing increased internal connectivity within the ictogenic region and elevated inhibitory input from the non-involved regions to the ictogenic region. Conversely, large responses close to the stimulation site reflect local excitability, manifesting as an increased N1 amplitude and overriding HFO. Further research is required to establish whether these novel electrophysiological methods, either individually or in combination, can function as robust biomarkers of epileptogenicity and hold promise for improving seizure prognosis.