老年人急诊就诊时使用的辅助设备存在缺陷

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Felipe Restrepo, Namrata Mali, Laura P Sands, Alan S. Abrahams, David M Goldberg, Richard Gruss, Nohel Zaman, Wendy Shields, Elise Omaki, Johnathon Ehsani, P. Ractham, L. Kaewkitipong
{"title":"老年人急诊就诊时使用的辅助设备存在缺陷","authors":"Felipe Restrepo, Namrata Mali, Laura P Sands, Alan S. Abrahams, David M Goldberg, Richard Gruss, Nohel Zaman, Wendy Shields, Elise Omaki, Johnathon Ehsani, P. Ractham, L. Kaewkitipong","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Many older adults adopt equipment to address physical limitations and reduce dependence on others to complete basic activities of daily living. Although a few prior studies have considered injuries associated with assistive devices for older adults, those studies focused on older adults’ health and functional risks for injury. There is limited analysis of older adult injuries involving defective or malfunctioning assistive devices.\n \n \n \n Data from this study are from the National Electronic Surveillance System All Injury Program (NEISS) which collected data on consumer product related injuries from a probability sample of 66 hospital Emergency Departments across the United States. Data from 30,776 older adult Emergency Department injury narratives from 2016 – 2020 were coded according to assistive device involved and whether malfunctioning led to injury. The study team manually examined all narratives in which the assistive device was coded to have malfunctioned.\n \n \n \n A total of 10,974 older adult Emergency Department cases were treated for 12,488 injuries involving a defective device. Injuries included 4,212 head and neck injuries (e.g., concussion), 4,317 trunk injuries (e.g., hip fractures), and 3,959 arm or leg injuries (e.g., leg fracture). Of these patients, 4,586 were admitted to a hospital ward for further evaluation and treatment. Seventy percent of these patients were injured while using a walker; in contrast wheelchairs were implicated in only four percent of the above cases. Design flaws were identified in 8,158 cases and part breakage/decoupling incidents in 2,816 cases.\n \n \n \n Our findings provide evidence that assistive devices are actively involved in older adult injuries. Further research is needed to reduce injuries associated with assistive devices by educating patients and their care providers about device use and assembly and developing effective methods for informing manufacturers about malfunctioning devices.\n","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"51 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defective assistive device involvement in older adult Emergency Department visits\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Restrepo, Namrata Mali, Laura P Sands, Alan S. Abrahams, David M Goldberg, Richard Gruss, Nohel Zaman, Wendy Shields, Elise Omaki, Johnathon Ehsani, P. Ractham, L. Kaewkitipong\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igad138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Many older adults adopt equipment to address physical limitations and reduce dependence on others to complete basic activities of daily living. Although a few prior studies have considered injuries associated with assistive devices for older adults, those studies focused on older adults’ health and functional risks for injury. There is limited analysis of older adult injuries involving defective or malfunctioning assistive devices.\\n \\n \\n \\n Data from this study are from the National Electronic Surveillance System All Injury Program (NEISS) which collected data on consumer product related injuries from a probability sample of 66 hospital Emergency Departments across the United States. Data from 30,776 older adult Emergency Department injury narratives from 2016 – 2020 were coded according to assistive device involved and whether malfunctioning led to injury. The study team manually examined all narratives in which the assistive device was coded to have malfunctioned.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 10,974 older adult Emergency Department cases were treated for 12,488 injuries involving a defective device. Injuries included 4,212 head and neck injuries (e.g., concussion), 4,317 trunk injuries (e.g., hip fractures), and 3,959 arm or leg injuries (e.g., leg fracture). Of these patients, 4,586 were admitted to a hospital ward for further evaluation and treatment. Seventy percent of these patients were injured while using a walker; in contrast wheelchairs were implicated in only four percent of the above cases. Design flaws were identified in 8,158 cases and part breakage/decoupling incidents in 2,816 cases.\\n \\n \\n \\n Our findings provide evidence that assistive devices are actively involved in older adult injuries. Further research is needed to reduce injuries associated with assistive devices by educating patients and their care providers about device use and assembly and developing effective methods for informing manufacturers about malfunctioning devices.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"51 13\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad138\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多老年人使用辅助设备来解决身体上的限制,并减少对他人的依赖,以完成基本的日常生活活动。尽管之前有一些研究考虑了与老年人辅助设备相关的伤害问题,但这些研究主要关注老年人的健康和功能性伤害风险。关于老年人因辅助设备缺陷或故障而受伤的分析非常有限。 本研究的数据来自国家电子监控系统所有伤害项目(NEISS),该项目从全美 66 家医院急诊科的概率样本中收集了与消费品相关的伤害数据。根据涉及的辅助设备以及故障是否导致伤害,对来自 2016-2020 年间 30776 份老年人急诊室伤害叙述的数据进行了编码。研究小组手动检查了所有辅助设备被编码为发生故障的叙述。 共有 10,974 个老年人急诊病例接受了治疗,其中有 12,488 起伤害涉及故障设备。损伤包括 4,212 例头颈部损伤(如脑震荡)、4,317 例躯干损伤(如髋部骨折)和 3,959 例手臂或腿部损伤(如腿部骨折)。在这些患者中,有 4586 人住进了医院病房,接受进一步的评估和治疗。这些患者中有 70% 是在使用助行器时受伤的;相比之下,只有 4% 的上述案例与轮椅有关。在 8,158 个案例中发现了设计缺陷,在 2,816 个案例中发现了部件断裂/脱钩事故。 我们的研究结果提供了证据,证明辅助设备与老年人伤害事故密切相关。为了减少与辅助器具相关的伤害,我们需要开展进一步的研究,对患者及其护理提供者进行器具使用和装配方面的教育,并开发有效的方法来告知制造商有关故障器具的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defective assistive device involvement in older adult Emergency Department visits
Many older adults adopt equipment to address physical limitations and reduce dependence on others to complete basic activities of daily living. Although a few prior studies have considered injuries associated with assistive devices for older adults, those studies focused on older adults’ health and functional risks for injury. There is limited analysis of older adult injuries involving defective or malfunctioning assistive devices. Data from this study are from the National Electronic Surveillance System All Injury Program (NEISS) which collected data on consumer product related injuries from a probability sample of 66 hospital Emergency Departments across the United States. Data from 30,776 older adult Emergency Department injury narratives from 2016 – 2020 were coded according to assistive device involved and whether malfunctioning led to injury. The study team manually examined all narratives in which the assistive device was coded to have malfunctioned. A total of 10,974 older adult Emergency Department cases were treated for 12,488 injuries involving a defective device. Injuries included 4,212 head and neck injuries (e.g., concussion), 4,317 trunk injuries (e.g., hip fractures), and 3,959 arm or leg injuries (e.g., leg fracture). Of these patients, 4,586 were admitted to a hospital ward for further evaluation and treatment. Seventy percent of these patients were injured while using a walker; in contrast wheelchairs were implicated in only four percent of the above cases. Design flaws were identified in 8,158 cases and part breakage/decoupling incidents in 2,816 cases. Our findings provide evidence that assistive devices are actively involved in older adult injuries. Further research is needed to reduce injuries associated with assistive devices by educating patients and their care providers about device use and assembly and developing effective methods for informing manufacturers about malfunctioning devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信