英国生物库研究中内在能力评分的开发与验证

Melkamu Bedimo Beyene, Renuka Visvanathan, Muktar Ahmed, Beben Benyamin, John R. Beard, Azmeraw T Amare
{"title":"英国生物库研究中内在能力评分的开发与验证","authors":"Melkamu Bedimo Beyene, Renuka Visvanathan, Muktar Ahmed, Beben Benyamin, John R. Beard, Azmeraw T Amare","doi":"10.1101/2024.01.09.24301076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In 2015, the World Health Organization introduced the concept of intrinsic capacity (IC) to define the individual-level characteristics that enable an older person to be and do the things they value. This study developed an IC score for UK Biobank (UKB) study participants and validated its use as a tool for health outcome prediction, understanding healthy aging trajectories, and genetic research.\nMethods: Our analysis included data from 45,208 UKB participants who had a complete record of the ten variables included in the analysis. Factor adequacy was tested using Kaiser Meyer Olkin (KMO), Barthelt, and the determinant of matrix tests, and the number of factors was determined by the parallel analysis method. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were employed to determine the structure and dimensionality of indicators. Finally, the IC score was generated, and its construct and predictive validities as well as reliability were assessed.\nResults: The factor analysis identified a multidimensional construct comprising, one general factor (IC) and five specific factors (locomotor, vitality, cognitive, psychological, and sensory). The bifactor structure showed a better fit (comparative fit index = 0.995, Tucker Lewis index = 0.976, root mean square error of approximation = 0.025, root mean square residual = 0.009) than the conventional five-factor structure. The IC score, generated using the bifactor confirmatory factor analysis has good construct validity, as demonstrated by an inverse association with age (lower IC in older age; beta = -0.035 (95%CI: -0.036, -0.034)), frailty (lower IC score in prefrail, beta = -0.104 (95%CI: (-0.114, -0.094) and frail, beta = -0.227 (95%CI: -0.267, -0.186) than the robust), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) for incident cases (a lower IC score associated with increased CCI, beta, = -0.019 (95%CI: -0.022, -0.015). The IC score also predicted incident CCI (a one-unit increase in baseline IC score led to lower CCI, beta = 0.147 (95%CI: -0.173, -0.121)).\nConclusion: The bifactor structure showed a better fit in all goodness of fit tests. The IC construct has strong structural, construct, and predictive validities and it is a promising tool for monitoring aging trajectories. Keywords: Intrinsic capacity, healthy aging, functional ability, physical functioning, mental functioning","PeriodicalId":501025,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Validation of an Intrinsic Capacity Score in the UK Biobank Study\",\"authors\":\"Melkamu Bedimo Beyene, Renuka Visvanathan, Muktar Ahmed, Beben Benyamin, John R. Beard, Azmeraw T Amare\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.01.09.24301076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In 2015, the World Health Organization introduced the concept of intrinsic capacity (IC) to define the individual-level characteristics that enable an older person to be and do the things they value. This study developed an IC score for UK Biobank (UKB) study participants and validated its use as a tool for health outcome prediction, understanding healthy aging trajectories, and genetic research.\\nMethods: Our analysis included data from 45,208 UKB participants who had a complete record of the ten variables included in the analysis. Factor adequacy was tested using Kaiser Meyer Olkin (KMO), Barthelt, and the determinant of matrix tests, and the number of factors was determined by the parallel analysis method. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were employed to determine the structure and dimensionality of indicators. Finally, the IC score was generated, and its construct and predictive validities as well as reliability were assessed.\\nResults: The factor analysis identified a multidimensional construct comprising, one general factor (IC) and five specific factors (locomotor, vitality, cognitive, psychological, and sensory). The bifactor structure showed a better fit (comparative fit index = 0.995, Tucker Lewis index = 0.976, root mean square error of approximation = 0.025, root mean square residual = 0.009) than the conventional five-factor structure. The IC score, generated using the bifactor confirmatory factor analysis has good construct validity, as demonstrated by an inverse association with age (lower IC in older age; beta = -0.035 (95%CI: -0.036, -0.034)), frailty (lower IC score in prefrail, beta = -0.104 (95%CI: (-0.114, -0.094) and frail, beta = -0.227 (95%CI: -0.267, -0.186) than the robust), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) for incident cases (a lower IC score associated with increased CCI, beta, = -0.019 (95%CI: -0.022, -0.015). The IC score also predicted incident CCI (a one-unit increase in baseline IC score led to lower CCI, beta = 0.147 (95%CI: -0.173, -0.121)).\\nConclusion: The bifactor structure showed a better fit in all goodness of fit tests. The IC construct has strong structural, construct, and predictive validities and it is a promising tool for monitoring aging trajectories. Keywords: Intrinsic capacity, healthy aging, functional ability, physical functioning, mental functioning\",\"PeriodicalId\":501025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.09.24301076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.09.24301076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2015 年,世界卫生组织提出了 "内在能力"(intrinsic capacity,IC)的概念,以定义使老年人能够成为和做他们所珍视的事情的个人层面特征。本研究为英国生物库(UKB)研究参与者开发了IC评分,并对其作为健康结果预测、了解健康老龄化轨迹和遗传研究工具的用途进行了验证:我们的分析包括来自 45208 名英国生物库参与者的数据,这些参与者对分析中的十个变量有完整的记录。使用 Kaiser Meyer Olkin (KMO)、Barthelt 和矩阵行列式测试检验因子的充分性,并通过平行分析方法确定因子的数量。采用探索性和确认性因子分析来确定指标的结构和维度。最后,生成了 IC 分值,并对其构造效度、预测效度和信度进行了评估:因子分析确定了一个多维的结构,包括一个总体因子(IC)和五个具体因子(运动、活力、认知、心理和感觉)。与传统的五因素结构相比,双因素结构显示出更好的拟合效果(比较拟合指数=0.995,塔克-刘易斯指数=0.976,均方根近似误差=0.025,均方根残差=0.009)。使用双因素确证因子分析得出的 IC 分数具有良好的构造效度,其与年龄(年龄越大 IC 分数越低;β = -0.035 (95%CI: -0.036, -0.034))、体弱(体弱前 IC 分数越低,β = -0.104(95%CI:(-0.114,-0.094)和体弱者,β=-0.227(95%CI:-0.267,-0.186)),以及夏尔森合并症指数(CCI)(IC 评分越低,CCI 越高,β=-0.019(95%CI:-0.022,-0.015))。IC 评分还能预测事件 CCI(基线 IC 评分每增加一个单位,CCI 就会降低,β = 0.147 (95%CI: -0.173, -0.121)):结论:双因素结构在所有拟合优度测试中都显示出更好的拟合效果。IC结构在结构、构造和预测方面都具有很强的有效性,是监测衰老轨迹的一种很有前途的工具。关键词内在能力 健康老龄化 功能能力 身体机能 心理机能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Validation of an Intrinsic Capacity Score in the UK Biobank Study
Background: In 2015, the World Health Organization introduced the concept of intrinsic capacity (IC) to define the individual-level characteristics that enable an older person to be and do the things they value. This study developed an IC score for UK Biobank (UKB) study participants and validated its use as a tool for health outcome prediction, understanding healthy aging trajectories, and genetic research. Methods: Our analysis included data from 45,208 UKB participants who had a complete record of the ten variables included in the analysis. Factor adequacy was tested using Kaiser Meyer Olkin (KMO), Barthelt, and the determinant of matrix tests, and the number of factors was determined by the parallel analysis method. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were employed to determine the structure and dimensionality of indicators. Finally, the IC score was generated, and its construct and predictive validities as well as reliability were assessed. Results: The factor analysis identified a multidimensional construct comprising, one general factor (IC) and five specific factors (locomotor, vitality, cognitive, psychological, and sensory). The bifactor structure showed a better fit (comparative fit index = 0.995, Tucker Lewis index = 0.976, root mean square error of approximation = 0.025, root mean square residual = 0.009) than the conventional five-factor structure. The IC score, generated using the bifactor confirmatory factor analysis has good construct validity, as demonstrated by an inverse association with age (lower IC in older age; beta = -0.035 (95%CI: -0.036, -0.034)), frailty (lower IC score in prefrail, beta = -0.104 (95%CI: (-0.114, -0.094) and frail, beta = -0.227 (95%CI: -0.267, -0.186) than the robust), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) for incident cases (a lower IC score associated with increased CCI, beta, = -0.019 (95%CI: -0.022, -0.015). The IC score also predicted incident CCI (a one-unit increase in baseline IC score led to lower CCI, beta = 0.147 (95%CI: -0.173, -0.121)). Conclusion: The bifactor structure showed a better fit in all goodness of fit tests. The IC construct has strong structural, construct, and predictive validities and it is a promising tool for monitoring aging trajectories. Keywords: Intrinsic capacity, healthy aging, functional ability, physical functioning, mental functioning
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信