根据滑坡综合治理方法选择滑坡治理替代方案

IF 5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Fang Liu, Zhongli Zhou, Jin Wu, Chengxi Liu, Yi Liu
{"title":"根据滑坡综合治理方法选择滑坡治理替代方案","authors":"Fang Liu, Zhongli Zhou, Jin Wu, Chengxi Liu, Yi Liu","doi":"10.1007/s40747-023-01307-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The disaster caused by landslide is huge. To prevent the spread of the disaster to the maximum extent, it is particularly important to carry out landslide disaster treatment work. The selection of landslide disaster treatment alternative is a large scale group decision-making (LSGDM) problem. Because of the wide application of social media, a large number of experts and the public can participate in decision-making process, which is conducive to improving the efficiency and correctness of decision-making. A IF-TW-LSGDM method based on three-way decision (TWD) and intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) is proposed and applied to the selection of landslide treatment alternatives. First of all, considering that experts and the public participate in the evaluation of LSGDM events, respectively, the method of obtaining and handling the public evaluation information is given, and the information fusion approach of the public and experts evaluation information is given. Second, evaluation values represented by fuzzy numbers are converted into intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs), and the intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation decision matrix described by IFNs is obtained. Then, a new LSGDM method of alternatives classification and ranking based on IFS and TWD is proposed, the calculation steps and algorithm description are given. In this process, we first cluster the experts, then consider the identification and management of non-cooperative behavior of expert groups. This work provides an effective method based on LSGDM for the selection of landslide treatment alternatives. Finally, the sensitivity of parameters is analyzed, and the feasibility and effectiveness of this method are compared and verified.</p>","PeriodicalId":10524,"journal":{"name":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of landslide treatment alternatives based on LSGDM method of TWD and IFS\",\"authors\":\"Fang Liu, Zhongli Zhou, Jin Wu, Chengxi Liu, Yi Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40747-023-01307-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The disaster caused by landslide is huge. To prevent the spread of the disaster to the maximum extent, it is particularly important to carry out landslide disaster treatment work. The selection of landslide disaster treatment alternative is a large scale group decision-making (LSGDM) problem. Because of the wide application of social media, a large number of experts and the public can participate in decision-making process, which is conducive to improving the efficiency and correctness of decision-making. A IF-TW-LSGDM method based on three-way decision (TWD) and intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) is proposed and applied to the selection of landslide treatment alternatives. First of all, considering that experts and the public participate in the evaluation of LSGDM events, respectively, the method of obtaining and handling the public evaluation information is given, and the information fusion approach of the public and experts evaluation information is given. Second, evaluation values represented by fuzzy numbers are converted into intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs), and the intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation decision matrix described by IFNs is obtained. Then, a new LSGDM method of alternatives classification and ranking based on IFS and TWD is proposed, the calculation steps and algorithm description are given. In this process, we first cluster the experts, then consider the identification and management of non-cooperative behavior of expert groups. This work provides an effective method based on LSGDM for the selection of landslide treatment alternatives. Finally, the sensitivity of parameters is analyzed, and the feasibility and effectiveness of this method are compared and verified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complex & Intelligent Systems\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complex & Intelligent Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01307-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complex & Intelligent Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-023-01307-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

滑坡造成的灾害是巨大的。为了最大限度地防止灾害蔓延,开展滑坡灾害治理工作尤为重要。滑坡灾害治理备选方案的选择是一个大规模群体决策(LSGDM)问题。由于社交媒体的广泛应用,大量专家和公众可以参与决策过程,有利于提高决策的效率和正确性。本文提出了一种基于三向决策(TWD)和直觉模糊集(IFS)的 IF-TW-LSGDM 方法,并将其应用于滑坡治理备选方案的选择。首先,考虑到专家和公众分别参与 LSGDM 事件的评价,给出了公众评价信息的获取和处理方法,并给出了公众评价信息和专家评价信息的信息融合方法。其次,将用模糊数表示的评价值转换为直觉模糊数(IFN),得到用直觉模糊数描述的直觉模糊评价决策矩阵。然后,提出了一种基于 IFS 和 TWD 的新的替代品分类和排序 LSGDM 方法,并给出了计算步骤和算法说明。在此过程中,我们首先对专家进行聚类,然后考虑专家组非合作行为的识别和管理。这项工作为滑坡处理备选方案的选择提供了一种基于 LSGDM 的有效方法。最后,分析了参数的敏感性,比较并验证了该方法的可行性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Selection of landslide treatment alternatives based on LSGDM method of TWD and IFS

Selection of landslide treatment alternatives based on LSGDM method of TWD and IFS

The disaster caused by landslide is huge. To prevent the spread of the disaster to the maximum extent, it is particularly important to carry out landslide disaster treatment work. The selection of landslide disaster treatment alternative is a large scale group decision-making (LSGDM) problem. Because of the wide application of social media, a large number of experts and the public can participate in decision-making process, which is conducive to improving the efficiency and correctness of decision-making. A IF-TW-LSGDM method based on three-way decision (TWD) and intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) is proposed and applied to the selection of landslide treatment alternatives. First of all, considering that experts and the public participate in the evaluation of LSGDM events, respectively, the method of obtaining and handling the public evaluation information is given, and the information fusion approach of the public and experts evaluation information is given. Second, evaluation values represented by fuzzy numbers are converted into intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IFNs), and the intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation decision matrix described by IFNs is obtained. Then, a new LSGDM method of alternatives classification and ranking based on IFS and TWD is proposed, the calculation steps and algorithm description are given. In this process, we first cluster the experts, then consider the identification and management of non-cooperative behavior of expert groups. This work provides an effective method based on LSGDM for the selection of landslide treatment alternatives. Finally, the sensitivity of parameters is analyzed, and the feasibility and effectiveness of this method are compared and verified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Complex & Intelligent Systems
Complex & Intelligent Systems COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
297
期刊介绍: Complex & Intelligent Systems aims to provide a forum for presenting and discussing novel approaches, tools and techniques meant for attaining a cross-fertilization between the broad fields of complex systems, computational simulation, and intelligent analytics and visualization. The transdisciplinary research that the journal focuses on will expand the boundaries of our understanding by investigating the principles and processes that underlie many of the most profound problems facing society today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信