Alexandra L. Young, Neil P. Oxtoby, Sara Garbarino, Nick C. Fox, Frederik Barkhof, Jonathan M. Schott, Daniel C. Alexander
{"title":"神经退行性疾病进展的数据驱动建模:跳出黑箱思维","authors":"Alexandra L. Young, Neil P. Oxtoby, Sara Garbarino, Nick C. Fox, Frederik Barkhof, Jonathan M. Schott, Daniel C. Alexander","doi":"10.1038/s41583-023-00779-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data-driven disease progression models are an emerging set of computational tools that reconstruct disease timelines for long-term chronic diseases, providing unique insights into disease processes and their underlying mechanisms. Such methods combine a priori human knowledge and assumptions with large-scale data processing and parameter estimation to infer long-term disease trajectories from short-term data. In contrast to ‘black box’ machine learning tools, data-driven disease progression models typically require fewer data and are inherently interpretable, thereby aiding disease understanding in addition to enabling classification, prediction and stratification. In this Review, we place the current landscape of data-driven disease progression models in a general framework and discuss their enhanced utility for constructing a disease timeline compared with wider machine learning tools that construct static disease profiles. We review the insights they have enabled across multiple neurodegenerative diseases, notably Alzheimer disease, for applications such as determining temporal trajectories of disease biomarkers, testing hypotheses about disease mechanisms and uncovering disease subtypes. We outline key areas for technological development and translation to a broader range of neuroscience and non-neuroscience applications. Finally, we discuss potential pathways and barriers to integrating disease progression models into clinical practice and trial settings. Data-driven disease progression models are computational tools that infer long-term disease timelines from short-term biomarker data and may provide insights into disease processes. In this Review, Young, Oxtoby et al. provide an overview of such models, with a focus on how they have been used in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, notably Alzheimer disease.","PeriodicalId":49142,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Neuroscience","volume":"25 2","pages":"111-130"},"PeriodicalIF":28.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data-driven modelling of neurodegenerative disease progression: thinking outside the black box\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra L. Young, Neil P. Oxtoby, Sara Garbarino, Nick C. Fox, Frederik Barkhof, Jonathan M. Schott, Daniel C. Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41583-023-00779-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data-driven disease progression models are an emerging set of computational tools that reconstruct disease timelines for long-term chronic diseases, providing unique insights into disease processes and their underlying mechanisms. Such methods combine a priori human knowledge and assumptions with large-scale data processing and parameter estimation to infer long-term disease trajectories from short-term data. In contrast to ‘black box’ machine learning tools, data-driven disease progression models typically require fewer data and are inherently interpretable, thereby aiding disease understanding in addition to enabling classification, prediction and stratification. In this Review, we place the current landscape of data-driven disease progression models in a general framework and discuss their enhanced utility for constructing a disease timeline compared with wider machine learning tools that construct static disease profiles. We review the insights they have enabled across multiple neurodegenerative diseases, notably Alzheimer disease, for applications such as determining temporal trajectories of disease biomarkers, testing hypotheses about disease mechanisms and uncovering disease subtypes. We outline key areas for technological development and translation to a broader range of neuroscience and non-neuroscience applications. Finally, we discuss potential pathways and barriers to integrating disease progression models into clinical practice and trial settings. Data-driven disease progression models are computational tools that infer long-term disease timelines from short-term biomarker data and may provide insights into disease processes. In this Review, Young, Oxtoby et al. provide an overview of such models, with a focus on how they have been used in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, notably Alzheimer disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Reviews Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"111-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":28.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Reviews Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-023-00779-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41583-023-00779-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Data-driven modelling of neurodegenerative disease progression: thinking outside the black box
Data-driven disease progression models are an emerging set of computational tools that reconstruct disease timelines for long-term chronic diseases, providing unique insights into disease processes and their underlying mechanisms. Such methods combine a priori human knowledge and assumptions with large-scale data processing and parameter estimation to infer long-term disease trajectories from short-term data. In contrast to ‘black box’ machine learning tools, data-driven disease progression models typically require fewer data and are inherently interpretable, thereby aiding disease understanding in addition to enabling classification, prediction and stratification. In this Review, we place the current landscape of data-driven disease progression models in a general framework and discuss their enhanced utility for constructing a disease timeline compared with wider machine learning tools that construct static disease profiles. We review the insights they have enabled across multiple neurodegenerative diseases, notably Alzheimer disease, for applications such as determining temporal trajectories of disease biomarkers, testing hypotheses about disease mechanisms and uncovering disease subtypes. We outline key areas for technological development and translation to a broader range of neuroscience and non-neuroscience applications. Finally, we discuss potential pathways and barriers to integrating disease progression models into clinical practice and trial settings. Data-driven disease progression models are computational tools that infer long-term disease timelines from short-term biomarker data and may provide insights into disease processes. In this Review, Young, Oxtoby et al. provide an overview of such models, with a focus on how they have been used in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, notably Alzheimer disease.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Neuroscience is a multidisciplinary journal that covers various fields within neuroscience, aiming to offer a comprehensive understanding of the structure and function of the central nervous system. Advances in molecular, developmental, and cognitive neuroscience, facilitated by powerful experimental techniques and theoretical approaches, have made enduring neurobiological questions more accessible. Nature Reviews Neuroscience serves as a reliable and accessible resource, addressing the breadth and depth of modern neuroscience. It acts as an authoritative and engaging reference for scientists interested in all aspects of neuroscience.