绿色认证实践与流程创新接轨:国家经济发展中的减点与赶超

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
H. Nguyen, George Onofrei, Ying Yang, Kevin Nguyen, M. akbari, Hiep Pham
{"title":"绿色认证实践与流程创新接轨:国家经济发展中的减点与赶超","authors":"H. Nguyen, George Onofrei, Ying Yang, Kevin Nguyen, M. akbari, Hiep Pham","doi":"10.1108/bpmj-03-2023-0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe manufacturing investment shift from developed countries to emerging and developing regions creates further needs for identifying appropriate green certification strategies. This study proposes that alignments between green certification practices (GCRs) and process innovation (PIN) could help identify appropriate strategies that national economic development can influence.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the diffusion of innovation theories, this study proposed a taxonomy to examine whether sustainable performance differs depending on the levels of alignment and the role of national economic development. The study uses an empirical survey approach to highlight alignments between GCRs and PIN among developed, developing and emerging economic nations, addressing resource allocation for the world's sustainable development goals (SDGs).FindingsManufacturers need to align PIN practices with the level of green certification to achieve sustainable performance. Manufacturers experiencing higher payoffs from various improvements successfully align in GCR and PIN. The alignment between these two concepts can derive different taxonomies, which highlight performance and managerial implications for manufacturers. The manufacturers followed three distinct typologies: minimalist, process active and proactive. Besides, building on the theory of performance frontiers, the findings indicated that manufacturers in developing and emerging economies placed the most substantial GCR effort compared to their counterparts in developed nations. Manufacturers in developed countries are increasingly reaching the “diminishing points” and investing limited resources in GCR just enough to keep their competitive positioning as order qualifiers rather than order winners. Developing economies are catching up very quickly in attaining GCRs and business performance.Research limitations/implicationsThis insight is essential for managers to adapt to nations' economic development conditions and appropriately and effectively align resources.Practical implicationsThe findings offer a decision-making process and provide straightforward guidelines for supply chain managers' green certification adoption.Originality/valueIn including both PIN and green certification, this paper adds greater comprehensiveness and richness to the supply chain literature.","PeriodicalId":47964,"journal":{"name":"Business Process Management Journal","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Green certification practices and process innovation alignment: diminishing point and catching up in nation's economic development\",\"authors\":\"H. Nguyen, George Onofrei, Ying Yang, Kevin Nguyen, M. akbari, Hiep Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/bpmj-03-2023-0160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe manufacturing investment shift from developed countries to emerging and developing regions creates further needs for identifying appropriate green certification strategies. This study proposes that alignments between green certification practices (GCRs) and process innovation (PIN) could help identify appropriate strategies that national economic development can influence.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the diffusion of innovation theories, this study proposed a taxonomy to examine whether sustainable performance differs depending on the levels of alignment and the role of national economic development. The study uses an empirical survey approach to highlight alignments between GCRs and PIN among developed, developing and emerging economic nations, addressing resource allocation for the world's sustainable development goals (SDGs).FindingsManufacturers need to align PIN practices with the level of green certification to achieve sustainable performance. Manufacturers experiencing higher payoffs from various improvements successfully align in GCR and PIN. The alignment between these two concepts can derive different taxonomies, which highlight performance and managerial implications for manufacturers. The manufacturers followed three distinct typologies: minimalist, process active and proactive. Besides, building on the theory of performance frontiers, the findings indicated that manufacturers in developing and emerging economies placed the most substantial GCR effort compared to their counterparts in developed nations. Manufacturers in developed countries are increasingly reaching the “diminishing points” and investing limited resources in GCR just enough to keep their competitive positioning as order qualifiers rather than order winners. Developing economies are catching up very quickly in attaining GCRs and business performance.Research limitations/implicationsThis insight is essential for managers to adapt to nations' economic development conditions and appropriately and effectively align resources.Practical implicationsThe findings offer a decision-making process and provide straightforward guidelines for supply chain managers' green certification adoption.Originality/valueIn including both PIN and green certification, this paper adds greater comprehensiveness and richness to the supply chain literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Process Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-03-2023-0160\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Process Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-03-2023-0160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的制造业投资从发达国家向新兴和发展中地区转移,这进一步需要确定适当的绿色认证战略。本研究提出,绿色认证实践(GCR)与流程创新(PIN)之间的一致性有助于确定国家经济发展可以影响的适当战略。设计/方法/途径本研究借鉴创新扩散理论,提出了一种分类方法,以研究可持续绩效是否因一致性水平和国家经济发展的作用而有所不同。研究采用实证调查的方法,强调了发达国家、发展中国家和新兴经济国家的 GCR 与 PIN 之间的一致性,以解决世界可持续发展目标(SDGs)的资源分配问题。研究结果制造商需要使 PIN 实践与绿色认证水平保持一致,以实现可持续绩效。从各种改进中获得更高回报的制造商成功地将 GCR 和 PIN 结合起来。这两个概念之间的协调可以衍生出不同的分类法,从而突出对制造商的绩效和管理影响。制造商遵循三种不同的类型:最小化、流程主动化和积极主动化。此外,在绩效前沿理论的基础上,研究结果表明,与发达国家的制造商相比,发展中国家和新兴经济体的制造商在 GCR 方面投入的精力最多。发达国家的制造商正逐渐达到 "递减点",在 GCR 上投入的有限资源仅够维持其作为订单合格者而非订单赢家的竞争定位。研究局限性/意义这一洞察力对于管理者适应国家经济发展条件并合理有效地调整资源至关重要。研究结果为供应链管理者采用绿色认证提供了一个决策过程,并提供了直接的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Green certification practices and process innovation alignment: diminishing point and catching up in nation's economic development
PurposeThe manufacturing investment shift from developed countries to emerging and developing regions creates further needs for identifying appropriate green certification strategies. This study proposes that alignments between green certification practices (GCRs) and process innovation (PIN) could help identify appropriate strategies that national economic development can influence.Design/methodology/approachDrawing on the diffusion of innovation theories, this study proposed a taxonomy to examine whether sustainable performance differs depending on the levels of alignment and the role of national economic development. The study uses an empirical survey approach to highlight alignments between GCRs and PIN among developed, developing and emerging economic nations, addressing resource allocation for the world's sustainable development goals (SDGs).FindingsManufacturers need to align PIN practices with the level of green certification to achieve sustainable performance. Manufacturers experiencing higher payoffs from various improvements successfully align in GCR and PIN. The alignment between these two concepts can derive different taxonomies, which highlight performance and managerial implications for manufacturers. The manufacturers followed three distinct typologies: minimalist, process active and proactive. Besides, building on the theory of performance frontiers, the findings indicated that manufacturers in developing and emerging economies placed the most substantial GCR effort compared to their counterparts in developed nations. Manufacturers in developed countries are increasingly reaching the “diminishing points” and investing limited resources in GCR just enough to keep their competitive positioning as order qualifiers rather than order winners. Developing economies are catching up very quickly in attaining GCRs and business performance.Research limitations/implicationsThis insight is essential for managers to adapt to nations' economic development conditions and appropriately and effectively align resources.Practical implicationsThe findings offer a decision-making process and provide straightforward guidelines for supply chain managers' green certification adoption.Originality/valueIn including both PIN and green certification, this paper adds greater comprehensiveness and richness to the supply chain literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
9.80%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Business processes are a fundamental building block of organizational success. Even though effectively managing business process is a key activity for business prosperity, there remain considerable gaps in understanding how to drive efficiency through a process approach. Building a clear and deep understanding of the range process, how they function, and how to manage them is the major challenge facing modern business. Business Process Management Journal (BPMJ) examines how a variety of business processes intrinsic to organizational efficiency and effectiveness are integrated and managed for competitive success. BPMJ builds a deep appreciation of how to manage business processes effectively by disseminating best practice. Coverage includes: BPM in eBusiness, eCommerce and eGovernment Web-based enterprise application integration eBPM, ERP, CRM, ASP & SCM Knowledge management and learning organization Methodologies, techniques and tools of business process modeling, analysis and design Techniques of moving from one-shot business process re-engineering to continuous improvement Best practices in BPM Performance management Tools and techniques of change management BPM case studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信