情绪发展量表(简易版)。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
T. Sappok, B. Barrett, S. Lutter
{"title":"情绪发展量表(简易版)。","authors":"T. Sappok,&nbsp;B. Barrett,&nbsp;S. Lutter","doi":"10.1111/jir.13117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The <i>Scale of Emotional Development – Short</i> (<i>SED-S</i>) captures the level of emotional development in persons with a disorder of intellectual development (DID) with 200 items on five developmental levels. The study aims to develop a brief version of the SED-S.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Based on item analysis (proportions, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>-test, Spearman's <i>ρ</i> and corrected item–total correlation), a brief version of the SED-S was developed in a sample of 224 adults with a DID (<i>n</i><sub>1</sub>) and validated in a second independent matched sample (<i>n</i><sub>2</sub> = 223).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Item reliability ranged per item set from Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.835 to 0.924. Weighted kappa resulted in <i>κ</i><sub><i>ω</i></sub> = 0.743 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.690–0.802). Overall agreement of the brief version with the original SED-S was <i>P</i><sub><i>O</i></sub> = 0.7. The brief version of the SED-S showed weaknesses in distinguishing level 2 from the adjacent levels.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The brief version of the SED-S showed good reliability and moderate to good validity results. Items of phase 2 and, to some degree, of phase 5 should be revised to further improve the psychometric properties of the scale.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A brief version of the Scale of Emotional Development – Short\",\"authors\":\"T. Sappok,&nbsp;B. Barrett,&nbsp;S. Lutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.13117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The <i>Scale of Emotional Development – Short</i> (<i>SED-S</i>) captures the level of emotional development in persons with a disorder of intellectual development (DID) with 200 items on five developmental levels. The study aims to develop a brief version of the SED-S.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Based on item analysis (proportions, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>-test, Spearman's <i>ρ</i> and corrected item–total correlation), a brief version of the SED-S was developed in a sample of 224 adults with a DID (<i>n</i><sub>1</sub>) and validated in a second independent matched sample (<i>n</i><sub>2</sub> = 223).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Item reliability ranged per item set from Cronbach's <i>α</i> = 0.835 to 0.924. Weighted kappa resulted in <i>κ</i><sub><i>ω</i></sub> = 0.743 (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.690–0.802). Overall agreement of the brief version with the original SED-S was <i>P</i><sub><i>O</i></sub> = 0.7. The brief version of the SED-S showed weaknesses in distinguishing level 2 from the adjacent levels.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The brief version of the SED-S showed good reliability and moderate to good validity results. Items of phase 2 and, to some degree, of phase 5 should be revised to further improve the psychometric properties of the scale.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jir.13117\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13117\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jir.13117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:情绪发展量表-简版(SED-S)通过五个发展水平的 200 个项目来反映智力发展障碍(DID)患者的情绪发展水平。本研究旨在编制简明版 SED-S:根据项目分析(比例、χ2 检验、斯皮尔曼ρ和校正项目总相关性),在 224 名智力发育障碍成人样本(n1)中开发了简明版 SED-S,并在第二个独立匹配样本(n2 = 223)中进行了验证:每组项目的信度范围为 Cronbach's α = 0.835 至 0.924。加权卡帕结果为κω = 0.743(P O = 0.7)。简明版 SED-S 在区分第 2 级和相邻级别方面存在不足:简明版 SED-S 显示出良好的信度和中度至良好的效度。结论:简明版 SED-S 显示出良好的信度和中度至良好的效度。应修订第 2 阶段的项目,并在一定程度上修订第 5 阶段的项目,以进一步提高量表的心理测量学特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A brief version of the Scale of Emotional Development – Short

Background

The Scale of Emotional Development – Short (SED-S) captures the level of emotional development in persons with a disorder of intellectual development (DID) with 200 items on five developmental levels. The study aims to develop a brief version of the SED-S.

Methods

Based on item analysis (proportions, χ2-test, Spearman's ρ and corrected item–total correlation), a brief version of the SED-S was developed in a sample of 224 adults with a DID (n1) and validated in a second independent matched sample (n2 = 223).

Results

Item reliability ranged per item set from Cronbach's α = 0.835 to 0.924. Weighted kappa resulted in κω = 0.743 (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval = 0.690–0.802). Overall agreement of the brief version with the original SED-S was PO = 0.7. The brief version of the SED-S showed weaknesses in distinguishing level 2 from the adjacent levels.

Conclusions

The brief version of the SED-S showed good reliability and moderate to good validity results. Items of phase 2 and, to some degree, of phase 5 should be revised to further improve the psychometric properties of the scale.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信