用模型检查和全局优化连接形式化方法和机器学习

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS
Saddek Bensalem , Xiaowei Huang , Wenjie Ruan , Qiyi Tang , Changshun Wu , Xingyu Zhao
{"title":"用模型检查和全局优化连接形式化方法和机器学习","authors":"Saddek Bensalem ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Huang ,&nbsp;Wenjie Ruan ,&nbsp;Qiyi Tang ,&nbsp;Changshun Wu ,&nbsp;Xingyu Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.jlamp.2023.100941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Formal methods and machine learning are two research fields with drastically different foundations and philosophies. Formal methods utilise mathematically rigorous techniques for software and hardware systems' specification, development and verification. Machine learning focuses on pragmatic approaches to gradually improve a parameterised model by observing a training data set. While historically, the two fields lack communication, this trend has changed in the past few years with an outburst of research interest in the robustness verification of neural networks. This paper will briefly review these works, and focus on the urgent need for broader and more in-depth communication between the two fields, with the ultimate goal of developing learning-enabled systems with excellent performance and acceptable safety and security. We present a specification language, MLS<sup>2</sup>, and show that it can express a set of known safety and security properties, including generalisation, uncertainty, robustness, data poisoning, backdoor, model stealing, membership inference, model inversion, interpretability, and fairness. To verify MLS<sup>2</sup> properties, we promote the global optimisation-based methods, which have provable guarantees on the convergence to the optimal solution. Many of them have theoretical bounds on the gap between current solutions and the optimal solution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48797,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 100941"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352220823000950/pdfft?md5=524bb8cc97eab39538606c56c0fd3849&pid=1-s2.0-S2352220823000950-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging formal methods and machine learning with model checking and global optimisation\",\"authors\":\"Saddek Bensalem ,&nbsp;Xiaowei Huang ,&nbsp;Wenjie Ruan ,&nbsp;Qiyi Tang ,&nbsp;Changshun Wu ,&nbsp;Xingyu Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jlamp.2023.100941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Formal methods and machine learning are two research fields with drastically different foundations and philosophies. Formal methods utilise mathematically rigorous techniques for software and hardware systems' specification, development and verification. Machine learning focuses on pragmatic approaches to gradually improve a parameterised model by observing a training data set. While historically, the two fields lack communication, this trend has changed in the past few years with an outburst of research interest in the robustness verification of neural networks. This paper will briefly review these works, and focus on the urgent need for broader and more in-depth communication between the two fields, with the ultimate goal of developing learning-enabled systems with excellent performance and acceptable safety and security. We present a specification language, MLS<sup>2</sup>, and show that it can express a set of known safety and security properties, including generalisation, uncertainty, robustness, data poisoning, backdoor, model stealing, membership inference, model inversion, interpretability, and fairness. To verify MLS<sup>2</sup> properties, we promote the global optimisation-based methods, which have provable guarantees on the convergence to the optimal solution. Many of them have theoretical bounds on the gap between current solutions and the optimal solution.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100941\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352220823000950/pdfft?md5=524bb8cc97eab39538606c56c0fd3849&pid=1-s2.0-S2352220823000950-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352220823000950\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352220823000950","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

形式化方法和机器学习是两个基础和理念截然不同的研究领域。形式化方法利用数学上严格的技术来进行软件和硬件系统的规范、开发和验证。机器学习侧重于实用方法,通过观察训练数据集来逐步改进参数化模型。虽然从历史上看,这两个领域缺乏交流,但随着神经网络鲁棒性验证研究兴趣的爆发,这种趋势在过去几年中有所改变。本文将简要回顾这些研究成果,并重点讨论这两个领域之间进行更广泛、更深入交流的迫切需求,最终目标是开发出性能卓越、安全可靠的学习型系统。我们提出了一种规范语言--MLS2,并证明它可以表达一系列已知的安全和保安特性,包括泛化、不确定性、鲁棒性、数据中毒、后门、模型窃取、成员推理、模型反转、可解释性和公平性。为了验证 MLS2 的特性,我们推广了基于全局优化的方法,这些方法对收敛到最优解有可证明的保证。其中许多方法对当前解与最优解之间的差距有理论上的约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging formal methods and machine learning with model checking and global optimisation

Formal methods and machine learning are two research fields with drastically different foundations and philosophies. Formal methods utilise mathematically rigorous techniques for software and hardware systems' specification, development and verification. Machine learning focuses on pragmatic approaches to gradually improve a parameterised model by observing a training data set. While historically, the two fields lack communication, this trend has changed in the past few years with an outburst of research interest in the robustness verification of neural networks. This paper will briefly review these works, and focus on the urgent need for broader and more in-depth communication between the two fields, with the ultimate goal of developing learning-enabled systems with excellent performance and acceptable safety and security. We present a specification language, MLS2, and show that it can express a set of known safety and security properties, including generalisation, uncertainty, robustness, data poisoning, backdoor, model stealing, membership inference, model inversion, interpretability, and fairness. To verify MLS2 properties, we promote the global optimisation-based methods, which have provable guarantees on the convergence to the optimal solution. Many of them have theoretical bounds on the gap between current solutions and the optimal solution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming
Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS-LOGIC
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
22.20%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The Journal of Logical and Algebraic Methods in Programming is an international journal whose aim is to publish high quality, original research papers, survey and review articles, tutorial expositions, and historical studies in the areas of logical and algebraic methods and techniques for guaranteeing correctness and performability of programs and in general of computing systems. All aspects will be covered, especially theory and foundations, implementation issues, and applications involving novel ideas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信