{"title":"痴呆症家庭双向交流的序列分析:照顾者失能性交流的影响","authors":"Sohyun Kim, Will Chen, Shan Sun-Mitchell","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad104.3586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examined temporal relationships between antecedent family caregiver disabling communication and subsequent care recipient (persons living with dementia) communication during 75 in-home care video observations. Secondary analysis of 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, and 30-second timed-window analysis was conducted. 95% confidence intervals, p-values, and Yule’s Q statistics were used. The results showed that care recipient engaging, challenging, and neutral communication occurred at differing frequencies within each time window following disabling communication by family caregivers. Care recipient challenging verbal communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver challenging verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.51 – 1.77, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.204 – 0.277). Care recipient engaging verbal communication was more likely to occur with weaker chance within all time widows except 30-second window after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.11 – 1.17, p = .001 - .028, Yule’s Q = 0.151 – 0.080). Care recipient neutral communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.34 – 1.39, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.144 – 0.162). Care recipient neutral communication more likely occurred within all time widows except 5-second and 10-second windows after caregiver disabling nonverbal communication preceded (OR = 1.28 – 1.34, p =.009 - .029, Yule’s Q = 0.123 – 0.144). Caregiver disabling communication was associated with more likely subsequent care recipient communication. Future research can further explore how participant characteristics and types and frequencies of caregiver communication influence care recipient communication.","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"218 2","pages":"1117 - 1117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS OF DEMENTIA FAMILY DYADIC COMMUNICATION: EFFECT OF CAREGIVER DISABLING COMMUNICATION\",\"authors\":\"Sohyun Kim, Will Chen, Shan Sun-Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igad104.3586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study examined temporal relationships between antecedent family caregiver disabling communication and subsequent care recipient (persons living with dementia) communication during 75 in-home care video observations. Secondary analysis of 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, and 30-second timed-window analysis was conducted. 95% confidence intervals, p-values, and Yule’s Q statistics were used. The results showed that care recipient engaging, challenging, and neutral communication occurred at differing frequencies within each time window following disabling communication by family caregivers. Care recipient challenging verbal communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver challenging verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.51 – 1.77, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.204 – 0.277). Care recipient engaging verbal communication was more likely to occur with weaker chance within all time widows except 30-second window after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.11 – 1.17, p = .001 - .028, Yule’s Q = 0.151 – 0.080). Care recipient neutral communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.34 – 1.39, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.144 – 0.162). Care recipient neutral communication more likely occurred within all time widows except 5-second and 10-second windows after caregiver disabling nonverbal communication preceded (OR = 1.28 – 1.34, p =.009 - .029, Yule’s Q = 0.123 – 0.144). Caregiver disabling communication was associated with more likely subsequent care recipient communication. Future research can further explore how participant characteristics and types and frequencies of caregiver communication influence care recipient communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"218 2\",\"pages\":\"1117 - 1117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.3586\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.3586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS OF DEMENTIA FAMILY DYADIC COMMUNICATION: EFFECT OF CAREGIVER DISABLING COMMUNICATION
Abstract This study examined temporal relationships between antecedent family caregiver disabling communication and subsequent care recipient (persons living with dementia) communication during 75 in-home care video observations. Secondary analysis of 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, and 30-second timed-window analysis was conducted. 95% confidence intervals, p-values, and Yule’s Q statistics were used. The results showed that care recipient engaging, challenging, and neutral communication occurred at differing frequencies within each time window following disabling communication by family caregivers. Care recipient challenging verbal communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver challenging verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.51 – 1.77, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.204 – 0.277). Care recipient engaging verbal communication was more likely to occur with weaker chance within all time widows except 30-second window after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.11 – 1.17, p = .001 - .028, Yule’s Q = 0.151 – 0.080). Care recipient neutral communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.34 – 1.39, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.144 – 0.162). Care recipient neutral communication more likely occurred within all time widows except 5-second and 10-second windows after caregiver disabling nonverbal communication preceded (OR = 1.28 – 1.34, p =.009 - .029, Yule’s Q = 0.123 – 0.144). Caregiver disabling communication was associated with more likely subsequent care recipient communication. Future research can further explore how participant characteristics and types and frequencies of caregiver communication influence care recipient communication.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.