敲除 CA1 和齿状回中的 NMDARs 无法损害小鼠条件行为的时间控制。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Hippocampus Pub Date : 2023-12-22 DOI:10.1002/hipo.23593
Jasmin A. Strickland, Joseph M. Austen, Rolf Sprengel, David J. Sanderson
{"title":"敲除 CA1 和齿状回中的 NMDARs 无法损害小鼠条件行为的时间控制。","authors":"Jasmin A. Strickland,&nbsp;Joseph M. Austen,&nbsp;Rolf Sprengel,&nbsp;David J. Sanderson","doi":"10.1002/hipo.23593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The hippocampus has been implicated in temporal learning. Plasticity within the hippocampus requires NMDA receptor-dependent glutamatergic neurotransmission. We tested the prediction that hippocampal NMDA receptors are required for learning about time by testing mice that lack postembryonal NMDARs in the CA1 and dentate gyrus (DG) hippocampal subfields on three different appetitive temporal learning procedures. The conditional knockout mice (<i>Grin1</i><sup><i>ΔDCA1</i></sup>) showed normal sensitivity to cue duration, responding at a higher level to a short duration cue than compared to a long duration cue. Knockout mice also showed normal precision and accuracy of response timing in the peak procedure in which reinforcement occurred after 10 s delay within a 30 s cue presentation. Mice were tested on the matching of response rates to reinforcement rates on instrumental conditioning with two levers reinforced on a concurrent variable interval schedule. Pressing on one lever was reinforced at a higher rate than the other lever. <i>Grin1</i><sup><i>ΔDGCA1</i></sup> mice showed normal sensitivity to the relative reinforcement rates of the levers. In contrast to the lack of effect of hippocampal NMDAR deletion on measures of temporal sensitivity, <i>Grin1</i><sup><i>ΔDGCA1</i></sup> mice showed increased baseline measures of magazine activity and lever pressing. Furthermore, reversal learning was enhanced when the reward contingencies were switched in the lever pressing task, but this was true only for mice trained with a large difference between relative reinforcement rates between the levers. The results failed to demonstrate a role for NMDARs in excitatory CA1 and DG neurons in learning about temporal information.</p>","PeriodicalId":13171,"journal":{"name":"Hippocampus","volume":"34 3","pages":"126-140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hipo.23593","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knockout of NMDARs in CA1 and dentate gyrus fails to impair temporal control of conditioned behavior in mice\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin A. Strickland,&nbsp;Joseph M. Austen,&nbsp;Rolf Sprengel,&nbsp;David J. Sanderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hipo.23593\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The hippocampus has been implicated in temporal learning. Plasticity within the hippocampus requires NMDA receptor-dependent glutamatergic neurotransmission. We tested the prediction that hippocampal NMDA receptors are required for learning about time by testing mice that lack postembryonal NMDARs in the CA1 and dentate gyrus (DG) hippocampal subfields on three different appetitive temporal learning procedures. The conditional knockout mice (<i>Grin1</i><sup><i>ΔDCA1</i></sup>) showed normal sensitivity to cue duration, responding at a higher level to a short duration cue than compared to a long duration cue. Knockout mice also showed normal precision and accuracy of response timing in the peak procedure in which reinforcement occurred after 10 s delay within a 30 s cue presentation. Mice were tested on the matching of response rates to reinforcement rates on instrumental conditioning with two levers reinforced on a concurrent variable interval schedule. Pressing on one lever was reinforced at a higher rate than the other lever. <i>Grin1</i><sup><i>ΔDGCA1</i></sup> mice showed normal sensitivity to the relative reinforcement rates of the levers. In contrast to the lack of effect of hippocampal NMDAR deletion on measures of temporal sensitivity, <i>Grin1</i><sup><i>ΔDGCA1</i></sup> mice showed increased baseline measures of magazine activity and lever pressing. Furthermore, reversal learning was enhanced when the reward contingencies were switched in the lever pressing task, but this was true only for mice trained with a large difference between relative reinforcement rates between the levers. The results failed to demonstrate a role for NMDARs in excitatory CA1 and DG neurons in learning about temporal information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hippocampus\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"126-140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hipo.23593\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hippocampus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hipo.23593\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hippocampus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hipo.23593","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海马与颞叶学习有关。海马内的可塑性需要依赖 NMDA 受体的谷氨酸能神经传递。我们通过对在 CA1 和齿状回(DG)海马亚场缺乏胚后 NMDARs 的小鼠进行三种不同的食欲时间学习程序的测试,检验了海马 NMDA 受体是时间学习所必需的这一预测。条件性基因敲除小鼠(Grin1ΔDCA1)对线索持续时间表现出正常的敏感性,对短持续时间线索的反应高于对长持续时间线索的反应。基因敲除小鼠在峰值程序中也表现出正常的反应时间精确度和准确度,在该程序中,强化发生在线索呈现 30 秒内的 10 秒延迟之后。在工具性条件反射中,小鼠的反应率与强化率的匹配情况接受了测试。按下一个杠杆的强化率高于另一个杠杆。Grin1ΔDGCA1 小鼠对杠杆的相对强化率表现出正常的敏感性。与海马 NMDAR 缺失对时间敏感性的测量缺乏影响相反,Grin1ΔDGCA1 小鼠的杂志活动和杠杆按压的基线测量值有所增加。此外,当按压杠杆任务中的奖励或然性发生转换时,逆转学习会增强,但这只适用于在杠杆间相对强化率差异较大的情况下接受训练的小鼠。这些结果未能证明兴奋性 CA1 和 DG 神经元中的 NMDARs 在学习时间信息中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Knockout of NMDARs in CA1 and dentate gyrus fails to impair temporal control of conditioned behavior in mice

Knockout of NMDARs in CA1 and dentate gyrus fails to impair temporal control of conditioned behavior in mice

The hippocampus has been implicated in temporal learning. Plasticity within the hippocampus requires NMDA receptor-dependent glutamatergic neurotransmission. We tested the prediction that hippocampal NMDA receptors are required for learning about time by testing mice that lack postembryonal NMDARs in the CA1 and dentate gyrus (DG) hippocampal subfields on three different appetitive temporal learning procedures. The conditional knockout mice (Grin1ΔDCA1) showed normal sensitivity to cue duration, responding at a higher level to a short duration cue than compared to a long duration cue. Knockout mice also showed normal precision and accuracy of response timing in the peak procedure in which reinforcement occurred after 10 s delay within a 30 s cue presentation. Mice were tested on the matching of response rates to reinforcement rates on instrumental conditioning with two levers reinforced on a concurrent variable interval schedule. Pressing on one lever was reinforced at a higher rate than the other lever. Grin1ΔDGCA1 mice showed normal sensitivity to the relative reinforcement rates of the levers. In contrast to the lack of effect of hippocampal NMDAR deletion on measures of temporal sensitivity, Grin1ΔDGCA1 mice showed increased baseline measures of magazine activity and lever pressing. Furthermore, reversal learning was enhanced when the reward contingencies were switched in the lever pressing task, but this was true only for mice trained with a large difference between relative reinforcement rates between the levers. The results failed to demonstrate a role for NMDARs in excitatory CA1 and DG neurons in learning about temporal information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hippocampus
Hippocampus 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hippocampus provides a forum for the exchange of current information between investigators interested in the neurobiology of the hippocampal formation and related structures. While the relationships of submitted papers to the hippocampal formation will be evaluated liberally, the substance of appropriate papers should deal with the hippocampal formation per se or with the interaction between the hippocampal formation and other brain regions. The scope of Hippocampus is wide: single and multidisciplinary experimental studies from all fields of basic science, theoretical papers, papers dealing with hippocampal preparations as models for understanding the central nervous system, and clinical studies will be considered for publication. The Editor especially encourages the submission of papers that contribute to a functional understanding of the hippocampal formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信