{"title":"强制要求对非 FDA 监管的大麻进行报销是一项糟糕的公共政策。","authors":"Stuart Gitlow, Gregory Bunt, Frank Dowling","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2023.2282032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An influential cannabis lobby and its allies are engaged in an aggressive initiative to mandate health and worker's compensation insurance coverage for non-standardized, non-FDA-regulated cannabis products. If successful, mandated reimbursement would present a severe public health risk and force taxpayers to fund a risky and under-regulated industry. Leaders in psychiatry and other medical specialties have sounded the alarm about the marketing and sale of cannabis products for medical uses without prior review by the FDA. We echo their strong opposition to bills requiring workers' compensation carriers and health insurance plans to cover the cost of dispensary-purchased \"medical\" cannabis. Mandated insurance reimbursement of dispensary products is \"a recipe for a public health disaster, as lowering or eliminating out-of-pocket costs will encourage more consumers to become certified under a state's medical cannabis program, and result in more frequent use of higher-potency cannabinoids (e.g., THC and CBD) that are associated with serious adverse events.\" Until there are thorough studies into these products, including adverse events, side effects and long-term concerns, these products should <i>not</i> be considered appropriate alternatives to FDA-approved medications. Their use should <i>not</i> be encouraged nor paid for through mandated reimbursement by public or private third-party payers.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"71-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mandating reimbursement for non-FDA-regulated cannabis is bad public policy.\",\"authors\":\"Stuart Gitlow, Gregory Bunt, Frank Dowling\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10550887.2023.2282032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An influential cannabis lobby and its allies are engaged in an aggressive initiative to mandate health and worker's compensation insurance coverage for non-standardized, non-FDA-regulated cannabis products. If successful, mandated reimbursement would present a severe public health risk and force taxpayers to fund a risky and under-regulated industry. Leaders in psychiatry and other medical specialties have sounded the alarm about the marketing and sale of cannabis products for medical uses without prior review by the FDA. We echo their strong opposition to bills requiring workers' compensation carriers and health insurance plans to cover the cost of dispensary-purchased \\\"medical\\\" cannabis. Mandated insurance reimbursement of dispensary products is \\\"a recipe for a public health disaster, as lowering or eliminating out-of-pocket costs will encourage more consumers to become certified under a state's medical cannabis program, and result in more frequent use of higher-potency cannabinoids (e.g., THC and CBD) that are associated with serious adverse events.\\\" Until there are thorough studies into these products, including adverse events, side effects and long-term concerns, these products should <i>not</i> be considered appropriate alternatives to FDA-approved medications. Their use should <i>not</i> be encouraged nor paid for through mandated reimbursement by public or private third-party payers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Addictive Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"71-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Addictive Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2282032\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2023.2282032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
一个有影响力的大麻游说团体及其盟友正在积极倡议强制要求为非标准化、非 FDA 监管的大麻产品提供医疗和工伤保险。如果成功,强制报销将带来严重的公共健康风险,并迫使纳税人为一个风险大、监管不力的行业提供资金。精神病学和其他医学专业的领导者已经对未经美国食品药品管理局事先审查就营销和销售用于医疗用途的大麻产品敲响了警钟。我们与他们一样强烈反对要求工伤赔偿承保人和健康保险计划支付药房购买的 "医用 "大麻费用的法案。强制保险报销药房产品的费用是 "一场公共卫生灾难的秘诀,因为降低或取消自付费用将鼓励更多消费者获得州医用大麻计划的认证,并导致更频繁地使用与严重不良事件相关的高浓度大麻素(如四氢大麻酚和大麻二酚)"。在对这些产品(包括不良事件、副作用和长期担忧)进行彻底研究之前,这些产品不应被视为 FDA 批准药物的适当替代品。不应鼓励使用这些产品,也不应通过公共或私人第三方支付机构的强制报销来支付这些产品的费用。
Mandating reimbursement for non-FDA-regulated cannabis is bad public policy.
An influential cannabis lobby and its allies are engaged in an aggressive initiative to mandate health and worker's compensation insurance coverage for non-standardized, non-FDA-regulated cannabis products. If successful, mandated reimbursement would present a severe public health risk and force taxpayers to fund a risky and under-regulated industry. Leaders in psychiatry and other medical specialties have sounded the alarm about the marketing and sale of cannabis products for medical uses without prior review by the FDA. We echo their strong opposition to bills requiring workers' compensation carriers and health insurance plans to cover the cost of dispensary-purchased "medical" cannabis. Mandated insurance reimbursement of dispensary products is "a recipe for a public health disaster, as lowering or eliminating out-of-pocket costs will encourage more consumers to become certified under a state's medical cannabis program, and result in more frequent use of higher-potency cannabinoids (e.g., THC and CBD) that are associated with serious adverse events." Until there are thorough studies into these products, including adverse events, side effects and long-term concerns, these products should not be considered appropriate alternatives to FDA-approved medications. Their use should not be encouraged nor paid for through mandated reimbursement by public or private third-party payers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.