新生儿重症监护室婴儿癫痫发作诊断中脑电图和 aEEG 的比较研究。

IF 0.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-26 DOI:10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.37554
Elahe Movahedi Moghadam, Yalda Taghipour, Reza Shervin Badv, Maliheh Kadivar, Raziyeh Sangsari, Maryam Saeedi, Mahmoud Reza Ashrafi
{"title":"新生儿重症监护室婴儿癫痫发作诊断中脑电图和 aEEG 的比较研究。","authors":"Elahe Movahedi Moghadam, Yalda Taghipour, Reza Shervin Badv, Maliheh Kadivar, Raziyeh Sangsari, Maryam Saeedi, Mahmoud Reza Ashrafi","doi":"10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.37554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Seizure is a common sign in neonates hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) that may lead to morbidity and mortality. Most neonatal seizures are subclinical. Conventional EEG (cEEG) is the gold standard for detecting and monitoring seizures but is not widely available. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) has been used for over a decade to evaluate infants with seizures. In this study, we tried to determine the efficacy of aEEG as a widely available diagnostic tool in diagnosing seizures.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>All cases with seizures or suspicious seizures were admitted to the NICU of the Children's Medical Center for one year. cEEG and aEEG were performed for these infants. aEEG was recorded for at least six hours with a description of the tracing. Clinical information, outcomes, and questionnaires (patient information) were recorded in detail. The obtained data were analyzed with the SPSS version 24 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven out of twenty-five aEEG recordings were abnormal; other patients showed normal aEEGs. The most common clinical and neurological manifestations were seizure (68%) and hypotonia (28%); the mortality rate was 12%. No significant correlation was observed between aEEG findings and gender, age, familial relation, outcome, ultrasound result, type of seizure, and underlying disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Studies showed variable sensitivity and specificity values for aEEG. aEEG cannot be recommended as the only way to diagnose and manage seizures in neonates. However, Good accessibility and ease of working with aEEG promote a tendency to use this procedure as a screening tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":14537,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of EEG and aEEG in Seizure Diagnosis in Infants Admitted to the NICU.\",\"authors\":\"Elahe Movahedi Moghadam, Yalda Taghipour, Reza Shervin Badv, Maliheh Kadivar, Raziyeh Sangsari, Maryam Saeedi, Mahmoud Reza Ashrafi\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.37554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Seizure is a common sign in neonates hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) that may lead to morbidity and mortality. Most neonatal seizures are subclinical. Conventional EEG (cEEG) is the gold standard for detecting and monitoring seizures but is not widely available. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) has been used for over a decade to evaluate infants with seizures. In this study, we tried to determine the efficacy of aEEG as a widely available diagnostic tool in diagnosing seizures.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>All cases with seizures or suspicious seizures were admitted to the NICU of the Children's Medical Center for one year. cEEG and aEEG were performed for these infants. aEEG was recorded for at least six hours with a description of the tracing. Clinical information, outcomes, and questionnaires (patient information) were recorded in detail. The obtained data were analyzed with the SPSS version 24 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven out of twenty-five aEEG recordings were abnormal; other patients showed normal aEEGs. The most common clinical and neurological manifestations were seizure (68%) and hypotonia (28%); the mortality rate was 12%. No significant correlation was observed between aEEG findings and gender, age, familial relation, outcome, ultrasound result, type of seizure, and underlying disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Studies showed variable sensitivity and specificity values for aEEG. aEEG cannot be recommended as the only way to diagnose and manage seizures in neonates. However, Good accessibility and ease of working with aEEG promote a tendency to use this procedure as a screening tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704297/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.37554\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v17i4.37554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:癫痫发作是新生儿重症监护室(NICU)住院新生儿的常见症状,可能导致发病和死亡。大多数新生儿癫痫发作属于亚临床症状。常规脑电图(cEEG)是检测和监测癫痫发作的黄金标准,但并不普及。十多年来,振幅积分脑电图(aEEG)一直被用于评估有癫痫发作的婴儿。在这项研究中,我们试图确定脑电图作为一种广泛使用的诊断工具在诊断癫痫发作方面的有效性:对这些婴儿进行 cEEG 和 aEEG 检查。aEEG 至少记录六小时,并附有描记。详细记录了临床信息、结果和调查问卷(患者信息)。所得数据使用 SPSS 24 版软件进行分析:结果:25 份电子脑电图记录中有 11 份异常,其他患者的电子脑电图正常。最常见的临床和神经系统表现是癫痫发作(68%)和肌张力低下(28%);死亡率为 12%。AEEG结果与性别、年龄、家族关系、预后、超声结果、癫痫发作类型和潜在疾病之间无明显相关性:研究显示,电子脑电图的敏感性和特异性值各不相同。电子脑电图不能被推荐为诊断和处理新生儿癫痫发作的唯一方法。然而,电子脑电图的可及性和易操作性使人们倾向于将其用作筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study of EEG and aEEG in Seizure Diagnosis in Infants Admitted to the NICU.

Objectives: Seizure is a common sign in neonates hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) that may lead to morbidity and mortality. Most neonatal seizures are subclinical. Conventional EEG (cEEG) is the gold standard for detecting and monitoring seizures but is not widely available. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) has been used for over a decade to evaluate infants with seizures. In this study, we tried to determine the efficacy of aEEG as a widely available diagnostic tool in diagnosing seizures.

Materials & methods: All cases with seizures or suspicious seizures were admitted to the NICU of the Children's Medical Center for one year. cEEG and aEEG were performed for these infants. aEEG was recorded for at least six hours with a description of the tracing. Clinical information, outcomes, and questionnaires (patient information) were recorded in detail. The obtained data were analyzed with the SPSS version 24 software.

Results: Eleven out of twenty-five aEEG recordings were abnormal; other patients showed normal aEEGs. The most common clinical and neurological manifestations were seizure (68%) and hypotonia (28%); the mortality rate was 12%. No significant correlation was observed between aEEG findings and gender, age, familial relation, outcome, ultrasound result, type of seizure, and underlying disease.

Conclusion: Studies showed variable sensitivity and specificity values for aEEG. aEEG cannot be recommended as the only way to diagnose and manage seizures in neonates. However, Good accessibility and ease of working with aEEG promote a tendency to use this procedure as a screening tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信