医疗保健领域以雇主为导向的弹性工作制:关于由此产生的认知需求及其与工作和家庭结果之间关系的日记研究

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Vera C. Baumgartner, Roman Prem, Lars Uhlig, Christian Korunka, Bettina Kubicek
{"title":"医疗保健领域以雇主为导向的弹性工作制:关于由此产生的认知需求及其与工作和家庭结果之间关系的日记研究","authors":"Vera C. Baumgartner,&nbsp;Roman Prem,&nbsp;Lars Uhlig,&nbsp;Christian Korunka,&nbsp;Bettina Kubicek","doi":"10.1111/joop.12483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study investigates how cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility (i.e. to coordinate with others, to structure work tasks and to organize work and private obligations) relate to work–home outcomes among health care professionals. To understand the underlying psychological mechanisms of the relationship between cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home outcomes, we combined the challenge–hindrance approach with role theory. We hypothesized a positive relationship between cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home conflict via cognitive effort (strain process) and between cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home enrichment via learning to self-organize (learning process). Eighty-eight health care professionals working in eldercare homes participated in a diary study and provided 407 day-level datasets. They completed questionnaires twice a day over 5 working days. Our analyses show that the relationships between daily cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home outcomes depend on strain and learning processes. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility, although ambivalently related to work–home outcomes on the person level, trigger distinct strain and learning processes on the day level: daily coordinating with colleagues and daily structuring work tasks were related to work–home conflict via cognitive effort, whereas daily organizing work and family obligations was associated with work–home enrichment via learning to self-organize.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 2","pages":"579-601"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12483","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employer-oriented flexible work in health care: A diary study on the resulting cognitive demands and their relationship with work–home outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Vera C. Baumgartner,&nbsp;Roman Prem,&nbsp;Lars Uhlig,&nbsp;Christian Korunka,&nbsp;Bettina Kubicek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joop.12483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study investigates how cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility (i.e. to coordinate with others, to structure work tasks and to organize work and private obligations) relate to work–home outcomes among health care professionals. To understand the underlying psychological mechanisms of the relationship between cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home outcomes, we combined the challenge–hindrance approach with role theory. We hypothesized a positive relationship between cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home conflict via cognitive effort (strain process) and between cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home enrichment via learning to self-organize (learning process). Eighty-eight health care professionals working in eldercare homes participated in a diary study and provided 407 day-level datasets. They completed questionnaires twice a day over 5 working days. Our analyses show that the relationships between daily cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home outcomes depend on strain and learning processes. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility, although ambivalently related to work–home outcomes on the person level, trigger distinct strain and learning processes on the day level: daily coordinating with colleagues and daily structuring work tasks were related to work–home conflict via cognitive effort, whereas daily organizing work and family obligations was associated with work–home enrichment via learning to self-organize.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"volume\":\"97 2\",\"pages\":\"579-601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12483\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12483\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12483","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了以雇主为导向的灵活性所产生的认知需求(即与他人协调、安排工作任务以及安排工作和私人义务)与医疗保健专业人员的工作-家庭结果之间的关系。为了了解雇主导向灵活性所产生的认知需求与工作-家庭结果之间关系的潜在心理机制,我们将挑战-阻碍方法与角色理论相结合。我们假设,雇主导向的灵活性所产生的认知需求与通过认知努力(应变过程)产生的工作与家庭冲突之间,以及雇主导向的灵活性所产生的认知需求与通过学习自我组织(学习过程)产生的工作与家庭充实之间存在正相关关系。88 名在养老院工作的医护人员参与了一项日记研究,并提供了 407 个日级数据集。他们在 5 个工作日内每天填写两次问卷。我们的分析表明,以雇主为导向的灵活性导致的日常认知需求与工作-家庭结果之间的关系取决于应变和学习过程。此外,我们的结果表明,雇主导向的灵活性所产生的认知需求虽然在个人层面上与工作-家庭结果之间存在矛盾关系,但在日层面上却引发了不同的应变和学习过程:每天与同事的协调和每天工作任务的安排通过认知努力与工作-家庭冲突有关,而每天工作和家庭义务的安排则通过学习自我组织与工作-家庭充实有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Employer-oriented flexible work in health care: A diary study on the resulting cognitive demands and their relationship with work–home outcomes

Employer-oriented flexible work in health care: A diary study on the resulting cognitive demands and their relationship with work–home outcomes

This study investigates how cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility (i.e. to coordinate with others, to structure work tasks and to organize work and private obligations) relate to work–home outcomes among health care professionals. To understand the underlying psychological mechanisms of the relationship between cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home outcomes, we combined the challenge–hindrance approach with role theory. We hypothesized a positive relationship between cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home conflict via cognitive effort (strain process) and between cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home enrichment via learning to self-organize (learning process). Eighty-eight health care professionals working in eldercare homes participated in a diary study and provided 407 day-level datasets. They completed questionnaires twice a day over 5 working days. Our analyses show that the relationships between daily cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility and work–home outcomes depend on strain and learning processes. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that cognitive demands resulting from employer-oriented flexibility, although ambivalently related to work–home outcomes on the person level, trigger distinct strain and learning processes on the day level: daily coordinating with colleagues and daily structuring work tasks were related to work–home conflict via cognitive effort, whereas daily organizing work and family obligations was associated with work–home enrichment via learning to self-organize.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信