服务设计者如何使用度量的实证研究

IF 1.8 2区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Estefania Ciliotta Chehade , Houjiang Liu , William Albert , Miso Kim
{"title":"服务设计者如何使用度量的实证研究","authors":"Estefania Ciliotta Chehade ,&nbsp;Houjiang Liu ,&nbsp;William Albert ,&nbsp;Miso Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.sheji.2023.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scholars have advocated for the importance of evaluation in service design, proposing comprehensive frameworks for such integration in design processes. This research seeks to complement existing theoretical studies by providing empirical insights into the utilization of metrics by practicing service designers. Our study presents findings derived from a global survey and in-depth interviews conducted with service designers from eleven countries. Our results highlight the value of using metrics in service design practice and a gap in systematic knowledge. We also underscore that organizational context can either foster or challenge the utilization of metrics in practice. This article contributes to ongoing service design evaluation research by providing data pertaining to the perceived benefits of metric usage within the service design process and in organizational collaboration, as well as insights into the perceived difficulties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37146,"journal":{"name":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","volume":"9 3","pages":"Pages 402-427"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240587262300062X/pdfft?md5=241cb261bacf6b782f9283c7b2094a63&pid=1-s2.0-S240587262300062X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Empirical Study of How Service Designers Use Metrics\",\"authors\":\"Estefania Ciliotta Chehade ,&nbsp;Houjiang Liu ,&nbsp;William Albert ,&nbsp;Miso Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sheji.2023.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Scholars have advocated for the importance of evaluation in service design, proposing comprehensive frameworks for such integration in design processes. This research seeks to complement existing theoretical studies by providing empirical insights into the utilization of metrics by practicing service designers. Our study presents findings derived from a global survey and in-depth interviews conducted with service designers from eleven countries. Our results highlight the value of using metrics in service design practice and a gap in systematic knowledge. We also underscore that organizational context can either foster or challenge the utilization of metrics in practice. This article contributes to ongoing service design evaluation research by providing data pertaining to the perceived benefits of metric usage within the service design process and in organizational collaboration, as well as insights into the perceived difficulties.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"volume\":\"9 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 402-427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240587262300062X/pdfft?md5=241cb261bacf6b782f9283c7b2094a63&pid=1-s2.0-S240587262300062X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240587262300062X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"She Ji-The Journal of Design Economics and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240587262300062X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

学者们提倡评估在服务设计中的重要性,并提出了在设计过程中进行评估的综合框架。本研究旨在补充现有的理论研究,提供实践服务设计师对度量的利用的经验见解。我们的研究结果来源于一项全球调查和对11个国家的服务设计师进行的深度访谈。我们的结果突出了在服务设计实践中使用度量的价值和系统知识的差距。我们还强调组织环境可以在实践中促进或挑战度量标准的使用。本文通过提供与服务设计过程和组织协作中度量标准使用的感知好处有关的数据,以及对感知到的困难的见解,为正在进行的服务设计评估研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Empirical Study of How Service Designers Use Metrics

Scholars have advocated for the importance of evaluation in service design, proposing comprehensive frameworks for such integration in design processes. This research seeks to complement existing theoretical studies by providing empirical insights into the utilization of metrics by practicing service designers. Our study presents findings derived from a global survey and in-depth interviews conducted with service designers from eleven countries. Our results highlight the value of using metrics in service design practice and a gap in systematic knowledge. We also underscore that organizational context can either foster or challenge the utilization of metrics in practice. This article contributes to ongoing service design evaluation research by providing data pertaining to the perceived benefits of metric usage within the service design process and in organizational collaboration, as well as insights into the perceived difficulties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信