在现实中风队列中,3个月时德语修正兰金量表结构化电话访谈的有效性。

Q2 Medicine
Lennart Steffen Milles, Doreen Pommeranz, Woon Hyung Chae, Jordi Kühne Escolà, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Martin Köhrmann, Benedikt Frank
{"title":"在现实中风队列中,3个月时德语修正兰金量表结构化电话访谈的有效性。","authors":"Lennart Steffen Milles, Doreen Pommeranz, Woon Hyung Chae, Jordi Kühne Escolà, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Martin Köhrmann, Benedikt Frank","doi":"10.1186/s42466-023-00289-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months is established as the primary outcome measure in clinical stroke trials. Traditionally, the mRS is assessed through an unstructured face-to-face interview. This approach can be labor-intensive and lead to suboptimal inter-rater reliability. Recently, the Covid-19 pandemic made face-to-face contact even more challenging. To address these issues, we developed and validated a structured German-language questionnaire for mRS testing by telephone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, we compared the mRS testing results of the standard face-to-face interview with those obtained in a structured interview by telephone using Cohen's Kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At our tertiary care stroke center, we included 108 patients who underwent both assessments. In 80.6% of cases (87/108) face-to-face and telephone interview reached identical scores. Linear weighted Kappa was 0.82 (p < 0.001). Unweighted Kappa for dichotomized mRS between fair (0-2) and poor (3-6) functional outcome was κ = 0.97 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study validates the use of the German-language structured telephone interview as a reliable instrument for the use in clinical trials. We encourage others to utilize the questionnaire. It is available as an Appendix (Additional file 1) to this publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":94156,"journal":{"name":"Neurological research and practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a German-language modified Rankin Scale structured telephone interview at 3 months in a real-life stroke cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Lennart Steffen Milles, Doreen Pommeranz, Woon Hyung Chae, Jordi Kühne Escolà, Christoph Kleinschnitz, Martin Köhrmann, Benedikt Frank\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42466-023-00289-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months is established as the primary outcome measure in clinical stroke trials. Traditionally, the mRS is assessed through an unstructured face-to-face interview. This approach can be labor-intensive and lead to suboptimal inter-rater reliability. Recently, the Covid-19 pandemic made face-to-face contact even more challenging. To address these issues, we developed and validated a structured German-language questionnaire for mRS testing by telephone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, we compared the mRS testing results of the standard face-to-face interview with those obtained in a structured interview by telephone using Cohen's Kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At our tertiary care stroke center, we included 108 patients who underwent both assessments. In 80.6% of cases (87/108) face-to-face and telephone interview reached identical scores. Linear weighted Kappa was 0.82 (p < 0.001). Unweighted Kappa for dichotomized mRS between fair (0-2) and poor (3-6) functional outcome was κ = 0.97 (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study validates the use of the German-language structured telephone interview as a reliable instrument for the use in clinical trials. We encourage others to utilize the questionnaire. It is available as an Appendix (Additional file 1) to this publication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94156,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurological research and practice\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10687899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurological research and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-023-00289-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-023-00289-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:3个月修正Rankin量表(mRS)被确立为临床脑卒中试验的主要结局指标。传统上,mRS是通过非结构化的面对面面试来评估的。这种方法可能是劳动密集型的,并导致次优的评级间可靠性。最近,新冠肺炎疫情使面对面交流变得更加困难。为了解决这些问题,我们开发并验证了一个结构化的德语问卷,用于通过电话进行mRS测试。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们使用Cohen’s Kappa将标准面对面访谈的mRS测试结果与电话结构化访谈的结果进行了比较。结果:在我们的三级护理卒中中心,我们纳入了108例接受两种评估的患者。80.6%的病例(87/108)的面对面访谈与电话访谈得分相同。线性加权Kappa为0.82 (p)结论:我们的研究验证了使用德语结构化电话访谈作为临床试验中使用的可靠工具。我们鼓励其他人使用问卷。它可作为本出版物的附录(附加文件1)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a German-language modified Rankin Scale structured telephone interview at 3 months in a real-life stroke cohort.

Background: The modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 3 months is established as the primary outcome measure in clinical stroke trials. Traditionally, the mRS is assessed through an unstructured face-to-face interview. This approach can be labor-intensive and lead to suboptimal inter-rater reliability. Recently, the Covid-19 pandemic made face-to-face contact even more challenging. To address these issues, we developed and validated a structured German-language questionnaire for mRS testing by telephone.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we compared the mRS testing results of the standard face-to-face interview with those obtained in a structured interview by telephone using Cohen's Kappa.

Results: At our tertiary care stroke center, we included 108 patients who underwent both assessments. In 80.6% of cases (87/108) face-to-face and telephone interview reached identical scores. Linear weighted Kappa was 0.82 (p < 0.001). Unweighted Kappa for dichotomized mRS between fair (0-2) and poor (3-6) functional outcome was κ = 0.97 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Our study validates the use of the German-language structured telephone interview as a reliable instrument for the use in clinical trials. We encourage others to utilize the questionnaire. It is available as an Appendix (Additional file 1) to this publication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信