一夫多妻制和双方同意的非一夫一妻制研究的范围综述:对更具包容性的家庭科学的影响

IF 3.2 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Shivangi Gupta, Mari Tarantino, Caroline Sanner
{"title":"一夫多妻制和双方同意的非一夫一妻制研究的范围综述:对更具包容性的家庭科学的影响","authors":"Shivangi Gupta,&nbsp;Mari Tarantino,&nbsp;Caroline Sanner","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Polyamory and consensual non-monogamy (CNM) refer to partnerships in which individuals have romantic, emotional, and/or sexual relationships with multiple people, with the knowledge and consent of everyone involved. Recent decades have seen a surge in research interest in polyamory and CNM, warranting efforts to pause and take stock of empirical findings. In this scoping review, we evaluate and synthesize 209 research studies about polyamory and CNM, paying particular attention to trends in research design, theoretical application, and substantive findings. Researchers have focused broadly on (a) outcomes of CNM relationships, (b) attitudes and perceptions of CNM, (c) antecedents of CNM, (d) CNM relational processes, (e) CNM identity development, (f) polyamorous family and parenting, and (g) CNM politics and discourse. We synthesize research findings within each domain, identify gaps in the literature, and discuss the challenges and opportunities we see in advancing research on polyamory and CNM.</p>","PeriodicalId":47446,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","volume":"16 2","pages":"151-190"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.12546","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of research on polyamory and consensual non-monogamy: Implications for a more inclusive family science\",\"authors\":\"Shivangi Gupta,&nbsp;Mari Tarantino,&nbsp;Caroline Sanner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jftr.12546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Polyamory and consensual non-monogamy (CNM) refer to partnerships in which individuals have romantic, emotional, and/or sexual relationships with multiple people, with the knowledge and consent of everyone involved. Recent decades have seen a surge in research interest in polyamory and CNM, warranting efforts to pause and take stock of empirical findings. In this scoping review, we evaluate and synthesize 209 research studies about polyamory and CNM, paying particular attention to trends in research design, theoretical application, and substantive findings. Researchers have focused broadly on (a) outcomes of CNM relationships, (b) attitudes and perceptions of CNM, (c) antecedents of CNM, (d) CNM relational processes, (e) CNM identity development, (f) polyamorous family and parenting, and (g) CNM politics and discourse. We synthesize research findings within each domain, identify gaps in the literature, and discuss the challenges and opportunities we see in advancing research on polyamory and CNM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"151-190\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jftr.12546\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Theory & Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12546\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jftr.12546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多配偶制(Polyamory)和双方同意的非一夫一妻制(CNM)指的是在每个人都知情和同意的情况下,个人与多人发生浪漫、情感和/或性关系的伙伴关系。近几十年来,人们对一夫多妻制和CNM的研究兴趣激增,这使得人们有必要停下来,对实证研究结果进行评估。在这篇综述中,我们评估和综合了209项关于一夫多妻制和CNM的研究,特别关注了研究设计、理论应用和实质性发现的趋势。研究人员广泛关注(a) CNM关系的结果,(b)对CNM的态度和看法,(c) CNM的前因,(d) CNM关系过程,(e) CNM身份发展,(f)多角家庭和养育,以及(g) CNM政治和话语。我们综合了每个领域的研究成果,确定了文献中的空白,并讨论了我们在推进一夫多妻制和CNM研究中看到的挑战和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A scoping review of research on polyamory and consensual non-monogamy: Implications for a more inclusive family science

A scoping review of research on polyamory and consensual non-monogamy: Implications for a more inclusive family science

Polyamory and consensual non-monogamy (CNM) refer to partnerships in which individuals have romantic, emotional, and/or sexual relationships with multiple people, with the knowledge and consent of everyone involved. Recent decades have seen a surge in research interest in polyamory and CNM, warranting efforts to pause and take stock of empirical findings. In this scoping review, we evaluate and synthesize 209 research studies about polyamory and CNM, paying particular attention to trends in research design, theoretical application, and substantive findings. Researchers have focused broadly on (a) outcomes of CNM relationships, (b) attitudes and perceptions of CNM, (c) antecedents of CNM, (d) CNM relational processes, (e) CNM identity development, (f) polyamorous family and parenting, and (g) CNM politics and discourse. We synthesize research findings within each domain, identify gaps in the literature, and discuss the challenges and opportunities we see in advancing research on polyamory and CNM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信