Ekaterina V Fedorova, Allison Mitchel, Maddy Finkelstein, Janna Ataiants, Carolyn F Wong, Bridgid M Conn, Stephen E Lankenau
{"title":"成人使用大麻合法化前:洛杉矶两组年轻成人大麻使用者的趋势研究。","authors":"Ekaterina V Fedorova, Allison Mitchel, Maddy Finkelstein, Janna Ataiants, Carolyn F Wong, Bridgid M Conn, Stephen E Lankenau","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2023.2282515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cannabis was legalized for adult use in California in 2016 for individuals 21 and older. Among 18-20-years-olds, who can possess cannabis legally as medical cannabis patients (MCP) but not as non-patient cannabis users (NPU), the impact of adult use legalization (AUL) on cannabis and other substance use is unknown. Two cohorts of 18-20-year-old cannabis users (MCP and NPU) were surveyed, one in 2014-15 (<i>n</i> = 172 \"pre-AUL\") and another in 2019-20 (<i>n</i> = 139 \"post-AUL\"), using similar data collection methods in Los Angeles, California. Logistic and negative binomial regressions estimated cohort and MCP differences for cannabis and other drug use outcomes based on past 90-day use. In both pre- and post-AUL cohorts, MCP were more likely to self-report medical cannabis use (<i>p</i> < .001) while the post-AUL cohort reported greater use of edibles (<i>p</i> < .01), but fewer mean days of alcohol (<i>p</i> < .05) and cigarette (<i>p</i> < .01) use in multivariate models. Notably, frequency of cannabis use (days or hits per day) did not significantly differ between the pre- and post-AUL cohorts, except for greater use of edibles, despite potentially greater access to cannabis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":" ","pages":"99-109"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-Post Cannabis Legalization for Adult Use: A Trend Study of Two Cohorts of Young Adult Cannabis Users in Los Angeles.\",\"authors\":\"Ekaterina V Fedorova, Allison Mitchel, Maddy Finkelstein, Janna Ataiants, Carolyn F Wong, Bridgid M Conn, Stephen E Lankenau\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02791072.2023.2282515\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cannabis was legalized for adult use in California in 2016 for individuals 21 and older. Among 18-20-years-olds, who can possess cannabis legally as medical cannabis patients (MCP) but not as non-patient cannabis users (NPU), the impact of adult use legalization (AUL) on cannabis and other substance use is unknown. Two cohorts of 18-20-year-old cannabis users (MCP and NPU) were surveyed, one in 2014-15 (<i>n</i> = 172 \\\"pre-AUL\\\") and another in 2019-20 (<i>n</i> = 139 \\\"post-AUL\\\"), using similar data collection methods in Los Angeles, California. Logistic and negative binomial regressions estimated cohort and MCP differences for cannabis and other drug use outcomes based on past 90-day use. In both pre- and post-AUL cohorts, MCP were more likely to self-report medical cannabis use (<i>p</i> < .001) while the post-AUL cohort reported greater use of edibles (<i>p</i> < .01), but fewer mean days of alcohol (<i>p</i> < .05) and cigarette (<i>p</i> < .01) use in multivariate models. Notably, frequency of cannabis use (days or hits per day) did not significantly differ between the pre- and post-AUL cohorts, except for greater use of edibles, despite potentially greater access to cannabis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychoactive drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"99-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116271/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychoactive drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2023.2282515\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2023.2282515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2016年,加州允许21岁及以上的成年人使用大麻。18-20岁的人可以作为医用大麻患者(MCP)合法拥有大麻,但不能作为非患者大麻使用者(NPU)合法拥有大麻,成人使用合法化对大麻和其他物质使用的影响尚不清楚。在加利福尼亚州洛杉矶使用类似的数据收集方法,对两组18-20岁的大麻使用者(MCP和NPU)进行了调查,一组是在2014-15年(n = 172“aul前”),另一组是在2019-20年(n = 139“aul后”)。Logistic回归和负二项回归估计了基于过去90天使用大麻和其他药物使用结果的队列和MCP差异。在aul之前和之后的队列中,MCP更有可能自我报告医用大麻使用(p p p p
Pre-Post Cannabis Legalization for Adult Use: A Trend Study of Two Cohorts of Young Adult Cannabis Users in Los Angeles.
Cannabis was legalized for adult use in California in 2016 for individuals 21 and older. Among 18-20-years-olds, who can possess cannabis legally as medical cannabis patients (MCP) but not as non-patient cannabis users (NPU), the impact of adult use legalization (AUL) on cannabis and other substance use is unknown. Two cohorts of 18-20-year-old cannabis users (MCP and NPU) were surveyed, one in 2014-15 (n = 172 "pre-AUL") and another in 2019-20 (n = 139 "post-AUL"), using similar data collection methods in Los Angeles, California. Logistic and negative binomial regressions estimated cohort and MCP differences for cannabis and other drug use outcomes based on past 90-day use. In both pre- and post-AUL cohorts, MCP were more likely to self-report medical cannabis use (p < .001) while the post-AUL cohort reported greater use of edibles (p < .01), but fewer mean days of alcohol (p < .05) and cigarette (p < .01) use in multivariate models. Notably, frequency of cannabis use (days or hits per day) did not significantly differ between the pre- and post-AUL cohorts, except for greater use of edibles, despite potentially greater access to cannabis.