药学专业学生对人工智能和ChatGPT的认识和态度

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Makiko Iwasawa, Masahiro Kobayashi, Katsuya Otori
{"title":"药学专业学生对人工智能和ChatGPT的认识和态度","authors":"Makiko Iwasawa, Masahiro Kobayashi, Katsuya Otori","doi":"10.46542/pe.2023.231.665675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study examined pharmacy students' knowledge and attitudes to artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT. Methods: A survey was conducted with 258 fourth-year pharmacy students at Kitasato University, Japan, assessing their AI knowledge, ChatGPT impressions, and literacy regarding its appropriate use. Data were analysed descriptively, and participants were divided into two groups based on ChatGPT awareness for further analysis. Results: A total of 113 students (43.7%) participated, with 19.5% having prior ChatGPT experience, 4.4% were unaware, and 42.5% could describe it. General AI terms like \"machine learning\" were more familiar (83.2%) than specific ones like \"natural language processing\" (2.6%). Positive impressions of ChatGPT included 65.5% finding it efficient and 50.4% mentioning enhanced comprehension. However, only 3.5% correctly identified all inappropriate purposes, and 24.8% selected all precautions for its use. The 48 participants (42.5%) who described ChatGPT and had higher AI knowledge showed more correct answers than the other group (65 participants, 57.5%). Conclusion: Students with AI knowledge and the ability to describe ChatGPT demonstrated a better understanding of its appropriate usage. Educating students on AI fundamentals helps them utilise AI tools like ChatGPT effectively. This study offers valuable insights on ChatGPT among pharmacy students, with implications for responsible AI usage and education.","PeriodicalId":19944,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Education","volume":"20 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and attitudes of pharmacy students towards artificial intelligence and the ChatGPT\",\"authors\":\"Makiko Iwasawa, Masahiro Kobayashi, Katsuya Otori\",\"doi\":\"10.46542/pe.2023.231.665675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This study examined pharmacy students' knowledge and attitudes to artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT. Methods: A survey was conducted with 258 fourth-year pharmacy students at Kitasato University, Japan, assessing their AI knowledge, ChatGPT impressions, and literacy regarding its appropriate use. Data were analysed descriptively, and participants were divided into two groups based on ChatGPT awareness for further analysis. Results: A total of 113 students (43.7%) participated, with 19.5% having prior ChatGPT experience, 4.4% were unaware, and 42.5% could describe it. General AI terms like \\\"machine learning\\\" were more familiar (83.2%) than specific ones like \\\"natural language processing\\\" (2.6%). Positive impressions of ChatGPT included 65.5% finding it efficient and 50.4% mentioning enhanced comprehension. However, only 3.5% correctly identified all inappropriate purposes, and 24.8% selected all precautions for its use. The 48 participants (42.5%) who described ChatGPT and had higher AI knowledge showed more correct answers than the other group (65 participants, 57.5%). Conclusion: Students with AI knowledge and the ability to describe ChatGPT demonstrated a better understanding of its appropriate usage. Educating students on AI fundamentals helps them utilise AI tools like ChatGPT effectively. This study offers valuable insights on ChatGPT among pharmacy students, with implications for responsible AI usage and education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmacy Education\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmacy Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2023.231.665675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2023.231.665675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究考察了药学专业学生对人工智能(AI)和ChatGPT的知识和态度。方法:对日本北中大学258名四年级药学专业学生进行调查,评估他们的人工智能知识、ChatGPT印象以及对其适当使用的读写能力。对数据进行描述性分析,并根据ChatGPT认知将参与者分为两组进行进一步分析。结果:共有113名学生(43.7%)参与,其中19.5%有ChatGPT经验,4.4%不知道,42.5%可以描述。一般的人工智能术语,如“机器学习”(83.2%)比“自然语言处理”(2.6%)等特定术语更熟悉。对ChatGPT的正面印象包括65.5%的人认为它有效,50.4%的人提到它提高了理解能力。然而,只有3.5%的人正确识别了所有不适当的用途,24.8%的人选择了所有预防措施。描述ChatGPT并具有较高人工智能知识的48名参与者(42.5%)比另一组(65名参与者,57.5%)给出了更多的正确答案。结论:具有人工智能知识和描述ChatGPT能力的学生对其正确用法有更好的理解。对学生进行人工智能基础知识教育,有助于他们有效地利用ChatGPT等人工智能工具。这项研究为药学专业学生的ChatGPT提供了有价值的见解,对负责任的人工智能使用和教育具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and attitudes of pharmacy students towards artificial intelligence and the ChatGPT
Background: This study examined pharmacy students' knowledge and attitudes to artificial intelligence (AI) and ChatGPT. Methods: A survey was conducted with 258 fourth-year pharmacy students at Kitasato University, Japan, assessing their AI knowledge, ChatGPT impressions, and literacy regarding its appropriate use. Data were analysed descriptively, and participants were divided into two groups based on ChatGPT awareness for further analysis. Results: A total of 113 students (43.7%) participated, with 19.5% having prior ChatGPT experience, 4.4% were unaware, and 42.5% could describe it. General AI terms like "machine learning" were more familiar (83.2%) than specific ones like "natural language processing" (2.6%). Positive impressions of ChatGPT included 65.5% finding it efficient and 50.4% mentioning enhanced comprehension. However, only 3.5% correctly identified all inappropriate purposes, and 24.8% selected all precautions for its use. The 48 participants (42.5%) who described ChatGPT and had higher AI knowledge showed more correct answers than the other group (65 participants, 57.5%). Conclusion: Students with AI knowledge and the ability to describe ChatGPT demonstrated a better understanding of its appropriate usage. Educating students on AI fundamentals helps them utilise AI tools like ChatGPT effectively. This study offers valuable insights on ChatGPT among pharmacy students, with implications for responsible AI usage and education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pharmacy Education
Pharmacy Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Education journal provides a research, development and evaluation forum for communication between academic teachers, researchers and practitioners in professional and pharmacy education, with an emphasis on new and established teaching and learning methods, new curriculum and syllabus directions, educational outcomes, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and workforce development. It is a peer-reviewed online open access platform for the dissemination of new ideas in professional pharmacy education and workforce development. Pharmacy Education supports Open Access (OA): free, unrestricted online access to research outputs. Readers are able to access the Journal and individual published articles for free - there are no subscription fees or ''pay per view'' charges. Authors wishing to publish their work in Pharmacy Education do so without incurring any financial costs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信