两个学生的故事:通过批判性系统思维概念化学术指导

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Autumn Asher BlackDeer, Braveheart Gillani, Flora Cohen, Mia T. Vogel
{"title":"两个学生的故事:通过批判性系统思维概念化学术指导","authors":"Autumn Asher BlackDeer, Braveheart Gillani, Flora Cohen, Mia T. Vogel","doi":"10.1080/10437797.2023.2248221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAcademic mentorship is a vital step in preparing the next generation, yet little information exists on what successful mentorship looks like—particularly the process by which one ascertains a mentor, builds and maintains mentoring relationships, and achieves success in doctoral programs. Systems thinking is applied here to conceptualize academic mentorship within doctoral education as perceived by three doctoral students in social work programs across two institutions. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe the seminal literature on academic mentorship, (b) conceptualize exemplar cases of academic mentorship for doctoral education, (c) center the perspectives of doctoral students and their mentorship experiences, (d) use a systems-thinking lens to map and visualize the important variables related to mentorship processes, and (e) hypothesize potential levers for successful mentorship within doctoral programs. Authors’ contributionsA.A.B. devised the project, the main conceptual ideas, and proof outline. A.A.B. developed the literature review and theory. All authors created initial causal loop diagrams of their mentorship experiences. B.G. and M.V. translated these with system dynamics software. B.G. created the tables and wrote results. F.C. wrote case conceptualizations and the conclusion. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and article.Availability of data and materialsThere were no datasets generated or analyzed in the preparation of this article.Code availabilityThere were no datasets generated or analyzed in the preparation of this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Ethics approval and consent to participatePreparation of this article did not involve human subjects and no Institutional Review Board approval was required.Additional informationFundingThere was no direct funding supporting the preparation of this article. FC is supported by Grant Number [T32MH019960] from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.Notes on contributorsAutumn Asher BlackDeerAutumn Asher BlackDeer is an Assistant Professor at the University of Denver Graduate School of Social Work.Braveheart GillaniBraveheart Gillani is a doctoral candidate in social work at Case Western Reserve University.Flora CohenFlora Cohen is an Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Mia T. VogelMia T. Vogel is a doctoral student at Washington University in St. Louis.","PeriodicalId":17012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Work Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tale of Two Mentees: Conceptualizing Academic Mentorship through Critical Systems Thinking\",\"authors\":\"Autumn Asher BlackDeer, Braveheart Gillani, Flora Cohen, Mia T. Vogel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10437797.2023.2248221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTAcademic mentorship is a vital step in preparing the next generation, yet little information exists on what successful mentorship looks like—particularly the process by which one ascertains a mentor, builds and maintains mentoring relationships, and achieves success in doctoral programs. Systems thinking is applied here to conceptualize academic mentorship within doctoral education as perceived by three doctoral students in social work programs across two institutions. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe the seminal literature on academic mentorship, (b) conceptualize exemplar cases of academic mentorship for doctoral education, (c) center the perspectives of doctoral students and their mentorship experiences, (d) use a systems-thinking lens to map and visualize the important variables related to mentorship processes, and (e) hypothesize potential levers for successful mentorship within doctoral programs. Authors’ contributionsA.A.B. devised the project, the main conceptual ideas, and proof outline. A.A.B. developed the literature review and theory. All authors created initial causal loop diagrams of their mentorship experiences. B.G. and M.V. translated these with system dynamics software. B.G. created the tables and wrote results. F.C. wrote case conceptualizations and the conclusion. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and article.Availability of data and materialsThere were no datasets generated or analyzed in the preparation of this article.Code availabilityThere were no datasets generated or analyzed in the preparation of this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Ethics approval and consent to participatePreparation of this article did not involve human subjects and no Institutional Review Board approval was required.Additional informationFundingThere was no direct funding supporting the preparation of this article. FC is supported by Grant Number [T32MH019960] from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.Notes on contributorsAutumn Asher BlackDeerAutumn Asher BlackDeer is an Assistant Professor at the University of Denver Graduate School of Social Work.Braveheart GillaniBraveheart Gillani is a doctoral candidate in social work at Case Western Reserve University.Flora CohenFlora Cohen is an Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Mia T. VogelMia T. Vogel is a doctoral student at Washington University in St. Louis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Work Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Work Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2248221\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Work Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2023.2248221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要学术导师是培养下一代的重要一步,然而关于成功的导师是什么样子的信息却很少——尤其是一个人确定导师、建立和维持导师关系以及在博士项目中取得成功的过程。系统思维在这里被应用于概念化博士教育中的学术指导,这是由两个机构的社会工作项目的三名博士生所感知的。本文的目的是(a)描述学术指导的开创性文献,(b)概念化博士教育学术指导的范例案例,(c)集中博士生的观点和他们的指导经历,(d)使用系统思考的视角来绘制和可视化与指导过程相关的重要变量,以及(e)假设博士项目中成功指导的潜在杠杆。作者的contributionsA.A.B。设计方案,主要概念思路,论证大纲。A.A.B.发展了文献综述和理论。所有作者都创建了他们指导经历的初始因果循环图。B.G.和M.V.用系统动力学软件翻译了这些。b。g。创建表格并编写结果。F.C.撰写案例概念和结论。所有作者都提供了重要的反馈,并帮助塑造了研究、分析和文章。数据和材料的可用性在本文的准备过程中没有生成或分析数据集。代码可用性在本文的准备过程中没有生成或分析任何数据集。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。伦理批准和参与者同意本文的准备不涉及人类受试者,也不需要机构审查委员会的批准。其他信息资金没有直接资金支持本文的编写。本研究由国家精神卫生研究所资助号[T32MH019960]支持。内容完全是作者的责任,并不一定代表国家精神卫生研究所或国家卫生研究所的官方观点。作者简介autumn Asher BlackDeer是丹佛大学社会工作研究生院的助理教授。吉拉尼是凯斯西储大学社会工作专业的博士候选人。弗洛拉·科恩(Flora Cohen)是伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校的助理教授。Mia T. Vogel是圣路易斯华盛顿大学的一名博士生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Tale of Two Mentees: Conceptualizing Academic Mentorship through Critical Systems Thinking
ABSTRACTAcademic mentorship is a vital step in preparing the next generation, yet little information exists on what successful mentorship looks like—particularly the process by which one ascertains a mentor, builds and maintains mentoring relationships, and achieves success in doctoral programs. Systems thinking is applied here to conceptualize academic mentorship within doctoral education as perceived by three doctoral students in social work programs across two institutions. The purpose of this article is to (a) describe the seminal literature on academic mentorship, (b) conceptualize exemplar cases of academic mentorship for doctoral education, (c) center the perspectives of doctoral students and their mentorship experiences, (d) use a systems-thinking lens to map and visualize the important variables related to mentorship processes, and (e) hypothesize potential levers for successful mentorship within doctoral programs. Authors’ contributionsA.A.B. devised the project, the main conceptual ideas, and proof outline. A.A.B. developed the literature review and theory. All authors created initial causal loop diagrams of their mentorship experiences. B.G. and M.V. translated these with system dynamics software. B.G. created the tables and wrote results. F.C. wrote case conceptualizations and the conclusion. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and article.Availability of data and materialsThere were no datasets generated or analyzed in the preparation of this article.Code availabilityThere were no datasets generated or analyzed in the preparation of this article.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Ethics approval and consent to participatePreparation of this article did not involve human subjects and no Institutional Review Board approval was required.Additional informationFundingThere was no direct funding supporting the preparation of this article. FC is supported by Grant Number [T32MH019960] from the National Institute of Mental Health. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health.Notes on contributorsAutumn Asher BlackDeerAutumn Asher BlackDeer is an Assistant Professor at the University of Denver Graduate School of Social Work.Braveheart GillaniBraveheart Gillani is a doctoral candidate in social work at Case Western Reserve University.Flora CohenFlora Cohen is an Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Mia T. VogelMia T. Vogel is a doctoral student at Washington University in St. Louis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
15.40%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Journal of Social Work Education is a refereed professional journal concerned with education in social work, and social welfare. Its purpose is to serve as a forum for creative exchange on trends, innovations, and problems relevant to social work education at the undergraduate, masters", and postgraduate levels. JSWE is published three times a year, in winter (January 15), spring/summer (May 15), and fall (September 15). It is available by subscription and is free with CSWE membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信