评估跨学科STEM实践的概念框架

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Su-Chi Fang, Kai-Lin Yang, Szu-Chun Fan
{"title":"评估跨学科STEM实践的概念框架","authors":"Su-Chi Fang, Kai-Lin Yang, Szu-Chun Fan","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2023.2264781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground Integrated STEM education has attracted increasing attention in global educational reforms. While transdisciplinary approaches are deemed useful pedagogy for integrated STEM curriculum design, few assessment instruments are available for appraising the efficacy of teaching and learning in transdisciplinary settings.Purpose This study proposes a framework to conceptualize the meaning of transdisciplinary STEM practices and demonstrates how the framework can be used to develop an assessment for transdisciplinary practices.Sources of evidence The conceptual framework is contextualized in design context. The concepts of need-to-do and need-to-know are used to illustrate how design engages students in transdisciplinary practices. The need-to-do cycle includes the four design phases, whereas the need-to-know part concerns the relevant STEM knowledge applied in these phases. Knowledge-based reasoning is identified as the focused practice in transdisciplinary STEM assessments. Based on the conceptual framework, we formulate the assessment template and scoring rubrics following the four steps suggested in the principled assessment design approach. Two dimensions – the types of disciplinary knowledge and the levels of reasoning – are examined to describe students’ transdisciplinary STEM practices in a design context. An exemplary STEM assessment task on a mini-wire-controlled car is presented.Main argument The conceptual framework proposed in this study presents one possible solution to align the goals of integrated STEM programs and their evaluation instruments.Conclusions The assessment of transdisciplinary STEM practices can contribute to our understanding of how students apply and reason with disciplinary knowledge in transdisciplinary settings.KEYWORDS: AssessmentdesignSTEM educationreasoningtransdisciplinary Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingMOST 109-2511-H-003-030.","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A conceptual framework for assessing transdisciplinary STEM practices\",\"authors\":\"Su-Chi Fang, Kai-Lin Yang, Szu-Chun Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02635143.2023.2264781\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTBackground Integrated STEM education has attracted increasing attention in global educational reforms. While transdisciplinary approaches are deemed useful pedagogy for integrated STEM curriculum design, few assessment instruments are available for appraising the efficacy of teaching and learning in transdisciplinary settings.Purpose This study proposes a framework to conceptualize the meaning of transdisciplinary STEM practices and demonstrates how the framework can be used to develop an assessment for transdisciplinary practices.Sources of evidence The conceptual framework is contextualized in design context. The concepts of need-to-do and need-to-know are used to illustrate how design engages students in transdisciplinary practices. The need-to-do cycle includes the four design phases, whereas the need-to-know part concerns the relevant STEM knowledge applied in these phases. Knowledge-based reasoning is identified as the focused practice in transdisciplinary STEM assessments. Based on the conceptual framework, we formulate the assessment template and scoring rubrics following the four steps suggested in the principled assessment design approach. Two dimensions – the types of disciplinary knowledge and the levels of reasoning – are examined to describe students’ transdisciplinary STEM practices in a design context. An exemplary STEM assessment task on a mini-wire-controlled car is presented.Main argument The conceptual framework proposed in this study presents one possible solution to align the goals of integrated STEM programs and their evaluation instruments.Conclusions The assessment of transdisciplinary STEM practices can contribute to our understanding of how students apply and reason with disciplinary knowledge in transdisciplinary settings.KEYWORDS: AssessmentdesignSTEM educationreasoningtransdisciplinary Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingMOST 109-2511-H-003-030.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2264781\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2264781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要背景STEM综合教育在全球教育改革中受到越来越多的关注。虽然跨学科方法被认为是综合STEM课程设计的有用教学法,但很少有评估工具可用于评估跨学科环境下教与学的有效性。本研究提出了一个框架来概念化跨学科STEM实践的意义,并演示了如何使用该框架来开发跨学科实践的评估。概念框架在设计语境中被语境化。“需要做”和“需要知道”的概念被用来说明设计如何让学生参与跨学科的实践。需要做的周期包括四个设计阶段,而需要知道的部分涉及在这些阶段应用的相关STEM知识。基于知识的推理被确定为跨学科STEM评估的重点实践。在概念框架的基础上,按照原则性评估设计方法提出的四个步骤,制定了评估模板和评分标准。两个维度——学科知识的类型和推理水平——被检查来描述学生在设计背景下的跨学科STEM实践。提出了一种基于微型线控汽车的示范性STEM评估任务。本研究提出的概念框架提出了一种可能的解决方案,以协调综合STEM项目及其评估工具的目标。跨学科STEM实践的评估有助于我们理解学生如何在跨学科环境中应用和推理学科知识。关键词:评估设计stem教育推理跨学科披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。更多信息:fundingmost 109-2511-H-003-030。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A conceptual framework for assessing transdisciplinary STEM practices
ABSTRACTBackground Integrated STEM education has attracted increasing attention in global educational reforms. While transdisciplinary approaches are deemed useful pedagogy for integrated STEM curriculum design, few assessment instruments are available for appraising the efficacy of teaching and learning in transdisciplinary settings.Purpose This study proposes a framework to conceptualize the meaning of transdisciplinary STEM practices and demonstrates how the framework can be used to develop an assessment for transdisciplinary practices.Sources of evidence The conceptual framework is contextualized in design context. The concepts of need-to-do and need-to-know are used to illustrate how design engages students in transdisciplinary practices. The need-to-do cycle includes the four design phases, whereas the need-to-know part concerns the relevant STEM knowledge applied in these phases. Knowledge-based reasoning is identified as the focused practice in transdisciplinary STEM assessments. Based on the conceptual framework, we formulate the assessment template and scoring rubrics following the four steps suggested in the principled assessment design approach. Two dimensions – the types of disciplinary knowledge and the levels of reasoning – are examined to describe students’ transdisciplinary STEM practices in a design context. An exemplary STEM assessment task on a mini-wire-controlled car is presented.Main argument The conceptual framework proposed in this study presents one possible solution to align the goals of integrated STEM programs and their evaluation instruments.Conclusions The assessment of transdisciplinary STEM practices can contribute to our understanding of how students apply and reason with disciplinary knowledge in transdisciplinary settings.KEYWORDS: AssessmentdesignSTEM educationreasoningtransdisciplinary Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingMOST 109-2511-H-003-030.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信