与战争有关的生活景观:乌克兰背景

IF 2.5 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Tetiana Tytarenko, Vadym Vasiutynskyi, Iryna Hubeladze, Svitlana Chunikhina, Hanna Hromova
{"title":"与战争有关的生活景观:乌克兰背景","authors":"Tetiana Tytarenko, Vadym Vasiutynskyi, Iryna Hubeladze, Svitlana Chunikhina, Hanna Hromova","doi":"10.1080/15325024.2023.2256219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractThe full-scale military invasion has changed the lives of all Ukrainians forever. The necessity to understand how the traumatic experiences of the first months of the war affected people’s ability of life-making, how it changed this ability was the reason for conducting this study. In April–May 2022, 169 respondents wrote essays based on 4 questions about their experience. The sample consisted of 78% women, 22% men (age M = 43.2, SD = 12), 43.2% had personal experience of being under fire. Descriptive and interpretative analyses, multiple correspondence analyses, and comparative analyses were conducted to identify key variables, types of life-making landscapes, and their possible correlations. The landscape of service (27.8%), care (23.7%), and existential landscape (24.3%) were the most spread. More than half of respondents (54.4%) described the experience of losses of relationship, usual lifestyle, home or earnings. In addition, 16.6% mentioned feeling of guilt. The trajectories of the value-time dynamics that set the type of landscape during war differ from that revealed during the pandemic. The loss of relationships is mentioned most often and the most painful part of the guilt experience is the feeling of helplessness in relation to loved ones. A passive or active position in responding to events and multi-contextual or narrow individual perception of the situation turned out to be the most important for a respondent’s place in the psychological space of the studied variables. Limitations and perspectives are discussed.Keywords: Ukrainian residentswar-related narrativeslandscapes of life-makingtraumaexperiences of losses Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes on contributorsTytarenko Tetiana, Doctor of Science in General Psychology, Professor, Senior Researcher at the Social Psychology of Personality Laboratory, Institute for Social and Political Psychology of NAES, Kyiv, Ukraine. Full Member of Ukraine National Academy of Educational Sciences. Main directions of scientific activities: postclassical approaches to personal life-making, methods of modeling and forecasting the future, psychology of a life crisis, posttraumatic development, and the possibility of providing psychological assistance; psychological health, socio-psychological rehabilitation and personal support.Vadym Vasiutynskyi is a Professor of Psychology, a Doctor of Science in Psychology (Doctor of Psychological Sciences), and a Chief Researcher of the Department of Mass and Communities Psychology in the Institute for Social and Political Psychology, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. He is also a Professor of Psychology Depts. at Lviv Ivan Franko National University and National University “Kyiv-Mohyla” Academy. The main directions of his scientific activities are: psychology of mass political consciousness; psychology of communities; psychology of poverty; psychology of power; psychology of gender; and consulting psychology.Iryna Hubeladze, Doctor of Sciences in Social Psychology, is an Acting Deputy Director on Scientific Matter and Head of the Laboratory of Mass and Communities Psychology at Institute for Social and Political Psychology at the National Academy of Educational Sciences (NAES) of Ukraine. She is also a lecturer at Kyiv School of Economics. Her research interests focus on psychological wellbeing and loss, sense of ownership, migration and social identity.Svitlana Chunikhina, Ph.D. in Psychology, is a Deputy Director on Methodical Matter at the Institute for Social and Political Psychology at the National Academy of Educational Sciences (NAES) of Ukraine. She is also the Head of the Ethics Committee at the National Psychological Association. Her research interests focus on political leadership, open-mindedness, congruency, and collective emotions.Hanna Hromova, Ph.D. in Psychology, Researcher at the Social Psychology of Personality Laboratory, Institute for Social and Political Psychology of NAES in Kyiv, Ukraine. She is a lecturer and a supervisor at the International Institute of Postgraduate education (Kyiv) and works as a certified Consultant in EMDR-method with adults. Recent years she works with refugees and IDPs, victims of interpersonal violence and victims of war; affective and personality disorders. Her research interests focus on personality psychology: intolerance of uncertainty, post traumatic stress and growth, time perspective and personal life-making.","PeriodicalId":47527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss & Trauma","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"War-Related Life-Making Landscapes: Ukrainian Context\",\"authors\":\"Tetiana Tytarenko, Vadym Vasiutynskyi, Iryna Hubeladze, Svitlana Chunikhina, Hanna Hromova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15325024.2023.2256219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractThe full-scale military invasion has changed the lives of all Ukrainians forever. The necessity to understand how the traumatic experiences of the first months of the war affected people’s ability of life-making, how it changed this ability was the reason for conducting this study. In April–May 2022, 169 respondents wrote essays based on 4 questions about their experience. The sample consisted of 78% women, 22% men (age M = 43.2, SD = 12), 43.2% had personal experience of being under fire. Descriptive and interpretative analyses, multiple correspondence analyses, and comparative analyses were conducted to identify key variables, types of life-making landscapes, and their possible correlations. The landscape of service (27.8%), care (23.7%), and existential landscape (24.3%) were the most spread. More than half of respondents (54.4%) described the experience of losses of relationship, usual lifestyle, home or earnings. In addition, 16.6% mentioned feeling of guilt. The trajectories of the value-time dynamics that set the type of landscape during war differ from that revealed during the pandemic. The loss of relationships is mentioned most often and the most painful part of the guilt experience is the feeling of helplessness in relation to loved ones. A passive or active position in responding to events and multi-contextual or narrow individual perception of the situation turned out to be the most important for a respondent’s place in the psychological space of the studied variables. Limitations and perspectives are discussed.Keywords: Ukrainian residentswar-related narrativeslandscapes of life-makingtraumaexperiences of losses Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes on contributorsTytarenko Tetiana, Doctor of Science in General Psychology, Professor, Senior Researcher at the Social Psychology of Personality Laboratory, Institute for Social and Political Psychology of NAES, Kyiv, Ukraine. Full Member of Ukraine National Academy of Educational Sciences. Main directions of scientific activities: postclassical approaches to personal life-making, methods of modeling and forecasting the future, psychology of a life crisis, posttraumatic development, and the possibility of providing psychological assistance; psychological health, socio-psychological rehabilitation and personal support.Vadym Vasiutynskyi is a Professor of Psychology, a Doctor of Science in Psychology (Doctor of Psychological Sciences), and a Chief Researcher of the Department of Mass and Communities Psychology in the Institute for Social and Political Psychology, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. He is also a Professor of Psychology Depts. at Lviv Ivan Franko National University and National University “Kyiv-Mohyla” Academy. The main directions of his scientific activities are: psychology of mass political consciousness; psychology of communities; psychology of poverty; psychology of power; psychology of gender; and consulting psychology.Iryna Hubeladze, Doctor of Sciences in Social Psychology, is an Acting Deputy Director on Scientific Matter and Head of the Laboratory of Mass and Communities Psychology at Institute for Social and Political Psychology at the National Academy of Educational Sciences (NAES) of Ukraine. She is also a lecturer at Kyiv School of Economics. Her research interests focus on psychological wellbeing and loss, sense of ownership, migration and social identity.Svitlana Chunikhina, Ph.D. in Psychology, is a Deputy Director on Methodical Matter at the Institute for Social and Political Psychology at the National Academy of Educational Sciences (NAES) of Ukraine. She is also the Head of the Ethics Committee at the National Psychological Association. Her research interests focus on political leadership, open-mindedness, congruency, and collective emotions.Hanna Hromova, Ph.D. in Psychology, Researcher at the Social Psychology of Personality Laboratory, Institute for Social and Political Psychology of NAES in Kyiv, Ukraine. She is a lecturer and a supervisor at the International Institute of Postgraduate education (Kyiv) and works as a certified Consultant in EMDR-method with adults. Recent years she works with refugees and IDPs, victims of interpersonal violence and victims of war; affective and personality disorders. Her research interests focus on personality psychology: intolerance of uncertainty, post traumatic stress and growth, time perspective and personal life-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Loss & Trauma\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Loss & Trauma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2023.2256219\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2023.2256219","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全面的军事入侵永远地改变了所有乌克兰人的生活。有必要了解战争最初几个月的创伤经历是如何影响人们的生活能力的,它是如何改变这种能力的,这是进行这项研究的原因。在2022年4月至5月,169名受访者根据4个关于他们经历的问题写了一篇文章。样本包括78%的女性,22%的男性(年龄M = 43.2, SD = 12), 43.2%的人有被攻击的个人经历。通过描述性和解释性分析、多重对应分析和比较分析来确定关键变量、生命形成景观类型及其可能的相关性。服务景观(27.8%)、护理景观(23.7%)和存在景观(24.3%)分布最广。超过一半的受访者(54.4%)描述了失去关系、正常生活方式、家庭或收入的经历。此外,16.6%的人提到了负罪感。决定战争期间形势类型的价值-时间动态轨迹不同于大流行病期间所揭示的轨迹。人们最常提到的是失去关系,而内疚经历中最痛苦的部分是与所爱的人相处时的无助感。对事件的被动或主动反应以及对情况的多情境或狭隘的个人感知被证明是受访者在研究变量的心理空间中最重要的位置。讨论了局限性和前景。关键词:乌克兰居民群体相关叙事;人生景观;创伤经历;作者简介:stytarenko Tetiana,普通心理学博士,教授,人格社会心理学实验室高级研究员,乌克兰基辅国家科学研究院社会和政治心理学研究所。乌克兰国家教育科学院正式成员。科研活动的主要方向:个人生活的后古典方法,建模和预测未来的方法,生活危机的心理学,创伤后发展,以及提供心理援助的可能性;心理健康、社会心理康复和个人支助。Vadym Vasiutynskyi,心理学教授,心理学博士(心理科学博士),乌克兰国家教育科学院社会与政治心理学研究所大众与社区心理学系首席研究员。他也是心理学教授。在利沃夫伊万·弗兰科国立大学和国立大学“基辅-莫希拉”学院。他的科学活动的主要方向是:群众政治意识心理学;社区心理学;贫困心理学;权力心理学;性别心理学;咨询心理学。Iryna Hubeladze,社会心理学博士,乌克兰国家教育科学院社会和政治心理学研究所科学事务代理副主任兼大众和社区心理学实验室主任。她也是基辅经济学院的讲师。她的研究兴趣主要集中在心理健康和失落、归属感、移民和社会认同。Svitlana Chunikhina,心理学博士,乌克兰国家教育科学院(NAES)社会和政治心理学研究所方法问题副主任。她也是美国国家心理协会伦理委员会主席。她的研究兴趣集中在政治领导,开放思想,一致性和集体情感。Hanna Hromova,心理学博士,人格社会心理学实验室研究员,乌克兰基辅NAES社会与政治心理学研究所。她是国际研究生教育研究所(基辅)的讲师和导师,也是emdr方法成人认证顾问。近年来,她与难民和国内流离失所者、人际暴力受害者和战争受害者合作;情感和人格障碍。她的研究兴趣集中在人格心理学:对不确定性的不容忍,创伤后压力和成长,时间观和个人生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
War-Related Life-Making Landscapes: Ukrainian Context
AbstractThe full-scale military invasion has changed the lives of all Ukrainians forever. The necessity to understand how the traumatic experiences of the first months of the war affected people’s ability of life-making, how it changed this ability was the reason for conducting this study. In April–May 2022, 169 respondents wrote essays based on 4 questions about their experience. The sample consisted of 78% women, 22% men (age M = 43.2, SD = 12), 43.2% had personal experience of being under fire. Descriptive and interpretative analyses, multiple correspondence analyses, and comparative analyses were conducted to identify key variables, types of life-making landscapes, and their possible correlations. The landscape of service (27.8%), care (23.7%), and existential landscape (24.3%) were the most spread. More than half of respondents (54.4%) described the experience of losses of relationship, usual lifestyle, home or earnings. In addition, 16.6% mentioned feeling of guilt. The trajectories of the value-time dynamics that set the type of landscape during war differ from that revealed during the pandemic. The loss of relationships is mentioned most often and the most painful part of the guilt experience is the feeling of helplessness in relation to loved ones. A passive or active position in responding to events and multi-contextual or narrow individual perception of the situation turned out to be the most important for a respondent’s place in the psychological space of the studied variables. Limitations and perspectives are discussed.Keywords: Ukrainian residentswar-related narrativeslandscapes of life-makingtraumaexperiences of losses Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes on contributorsTytarenko Tetiana, Doctor of Science in General Psychology, Professor, Senior Researcher at the Social Psychology of Personality Laboratory, Institute for Social and Political Psychology of NAES, Kyiv, Ukraine. Full Member of Ukraine National Academy of Educational Sciences. Main directions of scientific activities: postclassical approaches to personal life-making, methods of modeling and forecasting the future, psychology of a life crisis, posttraumatic development, and the possibility of providing psychological assistance; psychological health, socio-psychological rehabilitation and personal support.Vadym Vasiutynskyi is a Professor of Psychology, a Doctor of Science in Psychology (Doctor of Psychological Sciences), and a Chief Researcher of the Department of Mass and Communities Psychology in the Institute for Social and Political Psychology, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine. He is also a Professor of Psychology Depts. at Lviv Ivan Franko National University and National University “Kyiv-Mohyla” Academy. The main directions of his scientific activities are: psychology of mass political consciousness; psychology of communities; psychology of poverty; psychology of power; psychology of gender; and consulting psychology.Iryna Hubeladze, Doctor of Sciences in Social Psychology, is an Acting Deputy Director on Scientific Matter and Head of the Laboratory of Mass and Communities Psychology at Institute for Social and Political Psychology at the National Academy of Educational Sciences (NAES) of Ukraine. She is also a lecturer at Kyiv School of Economics. Her research interests focus on psychological wellbeing and loss, sense of ownership, migration and social identity.Svitlana Chunikhina, Ph.D. in Psychology, is a Deputy Director on Methodical Matter at the Institute for Social and Political Psychology at the National Academy of Educational Sciences (NAES) of Ukraine. She is also the Head of the Ethics Committee at the National Psychological Association. Her research interests focus on political leadership, open-mindedness, congruency, and collective emotions.Hanna Hromova, Ph.D. in Psychology, Researcher at the Social Psychology of Personality Laboratory, Institute for Social and Political Psychology of NAES in Kyiv, Ukraine. She is a lecturer and a supervisor at the International Institute of Postgraduate education (Kyiv) and works as a certified Consultant in EMDR-method with adults. Recent years she works with refugees and IDPs, victims of interpersonal violence and victims of war; affective and personality disorders. Her research interests focus on personality psychology: intolerance of uncertainty, post traumatic stress and growth, time perspective and personal life-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Loss & Trauma
Journal of Loss & Trauma PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: In one forum, Journal of Loss and Trauma brings together scholarship on personal losses relating to family, health, and aging issues. The journal addresses issues dealing with psychological and physical health and interpersonal losses relative to extended family, community life, and society as a whole. In order to broaden the reader"s perspective on loss and bereavement, the journal defines loss as a major reduction in a person"s resources, whether personal, material, or symbolic, to which the person was emotionally attached. Types of loss covered include: death and dying; dissolution and divorce; loss of employment; life-threatening diseases and long-term disability; loss of possessions; homelessness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信