《帝国进军:20世纪早期墨西哥加利福尼亚人对鳄梨的探索

Viridiana Hernández Fernández
{"title":"《帝国进军:20世纪早期墨西哥加利福尼亚人对鳄梨的探索","authors":"Viridiana Hernández Fernández","doi":"10.1080/20549547.2023.2266535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAt the turn of the twentieth century, agricultural explorers from the United States Department of Agriculture, Californian farmers, and the University of California scientists created the agricultural giant that California is today by extracting plant diversity from the Global South and protecting the nascent agricultural industry from outside competition. I define this process as “U.S. agricultural imperialism.” This article analyzes how U.S. agricultural imperialism in early-twentieth-century Latin America gave rise to a lucrative avocado industry closely associated with the Californian landscapes and agricultural identity and disconnected the fruit from its biological and cultural origins in Mexico and Central America to protect local production. U.S. institutions, growers, and scientists developed a thriving industry in the Golden State based on the extraction of avocado germplasm from Latin America while simultaneously banning the introduction of actual Mexican avocados to avoid outside competition.KEYWORDS: Avocadoplant-breedingexplorersCaliforniaagricultural imperialism AcknowledgmentsI wish to show my appreciation to the scholars and students of the UC Davis Latin American History Workshop for their generous feedback in the early stages of writing this article. I would also like to thank Dr. Erika Rappaport, Dr. Jeffrey Pilcher, and Elizabeth Schmidt for helping me finalize the project and the anonymous readers’ gen erous comments. Their suggestions significantly enriched this piece. This research received grant support from the UC Davis Hemispheric Institute on the Americas, the Tinker Foundation, and the Consortium for History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.Notes1. Olmstead and Rhode, Creating Abundance, 223.2. Although it is unclear how the term “alligator pear” was used in the first place, scholars believe it was because of the fruit’s shell resemblance with the alligator’s skin and the avocado shape of a pear. In 1941, the American Pomological Society and the USDA approved the term “avocado” as the translation to the Náhuatl-origin word ahuácatl (aguacate in Spanish).3. Olmstead and Rhode, “A History of California Agriculture,” 21.4. For wages, land, and transportation costs in twentieth-century California’s agricultural system, see Olmstead and Rhode, “A History of California Agriculture”5. Conkin, A Revolution Down on the Farm; Cochrane, Development of American Agriculture; Fitzgerald, Every Farm a Factory; Sackman, Orange Empire; Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage; Knight, Tropics of Hopes.6. Harris, Fruits of Eden; Stone, The Food Explorer; Gardner, American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century.7. Pauly, Fruits and Plains.8. Kloppenburg, First the Seed.9. Fullilove, The Profit of the Earth, 220.10. Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage; Stoll, “Insects and Institutions;” Knight, Tropic of Hopes.11. Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage; Knight, Tropic of Hopes.12. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 53.13. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 127.14. Barrett, “The Pilgrimage to Atlixco,” 42.15. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 55. The diversity of avocado strains in California at the turn of the twentieth century was not exclusive to this fruit. Californian nurseries imported different kinds of trees, like oranges, grapevines, pears, and apples, from abroad in vast numbers. Steve Stoll mentions that “between 1810 and 1942, approximately 570 species and varieties of trees -not shrubs, bulbs, vines, or flowers, but trees alone -entered California. Species and varieties of vines imported during the same period numbered 260,” in Stoll, “Insects and Institutions,” 217.16. McCook, States of Nature, Sharma, Empire’s Garden, Bender, “The Delectable and Dangerous.”17. Hayland, “History of U.S. Plant Introduction,” 27–28.18. Ibid., 26.19. Phillips et al. “Reflections on the United States Department of Agriculture,” 318.20. Quoted in Hayland, “History of U.S. Plant Introduction,” 28.21. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 5.22. Phillips et al., “Reflections on the United States Department of Agriculture,” 350–351.23. For a thorough study of bananas’ consumption in the United States, see Soluri, Banana Cultures.24. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 200.25. Tucker, Insatiable Appetite.26. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 79–81.27. Soto Laveaga, Jungle Laboratories, 10.28. Fairchild, “Our Plants Immigrants,” National Geographic Magazine, 179 (Emphasis added).29. Sackman, Orange Empire, chap. 1, Kindle.30. Knight, Tropics of Hope, 14.31. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 82–116.32. Collins, The Avocado, A Salad Fruit from the Tropics.33. Ibid., 28.34. Ibid., 29–35.35. Ibid., 41.36. For the Maya culture, the avocados were also grown in sacred gardens, and they even formed part of their mythology as Maya people believed that important ancestors became reborn through fruit trees, like the avocado.37. For more on avocado domestication in Mesoamerica, see Galindo-Tovar et al., “Some Aspects of Avocado Diversity and Domestication”38. Ibid., 41–42.39. Ibid., 44.40. Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 40.41. Acquaah, Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding, 146.42. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 205.43. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 97.44. Ibid.45. Quoted in Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 10 (Emphasis added).46. Stoll, “Insects and Institutions,” 217.47. Phillips et al., “Reflections on the United States Department of Agriculture,” 351.48. Stoll, “Insects and Institutions,” 218.49. Sackman, Orange Empire, chap 1 Kindle.50. Quoted in Ibid.51. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 205.52. Quoted in Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 43.53. McCook, States of Nature, 26.54. Ibid.55. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 199.56. Ibid., 200.57. California Avocado Association, “Fourth Annual Meeting,” 75 (italics in original); California Avocado Association, “Report of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 66.58. California Avocado Association, “Report of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 67.59. Ibid.60. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 21–22.61. Ibid., 22.62. Ibid.63. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 208.64. Knight, Tropic of Hopes, 83.65. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 59–61.66. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 209.67. Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 58.68. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 145.69. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 74.70. Ibid., 75–76.71. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 57.72. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 153.73. Knight, Tropics of Hopes, 92.74. Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage, 64.75. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 90.76. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 212.77. Ibid.78. Ibid., 211.79. Ibid., 213.80. Ibid., 213–214.81. Mexican migration numbers cited in Lytle Hernandez, Bad Mexicans, 208.82. Ibid., 214. Calavo even won the plaudits of Business Week in 1935 in an article titled “Calavo Growers Star as Sellers.”83. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 160–162.84. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 156.85. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 16.86. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 161–162.87. Quoted in Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 137.88. See Aluja at al., Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 293–309.89. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 165.90. Quoted in Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 129.91. Webber, “Honoring the Parent Tree” in California Avocado Association, Yearbook, 49–53.92. The term “Green Revolution” refers to the agricultural projects that mechanized agriculture, propagated the use of agrochemicals and fossil fuels, and increased food production by breeding high-yielding crop varieties in the mid-twentieth century. For more on the Green Revolution in Mexico and other countries in Latin America see Fitzgerald, “Exporting American Agriculture;” Garrard-Burnett, Lawrence, and Moreno, Beyond the Eagle’s Shadow; Olsson, Agrarian Crossings; Perkins, Geopolitics and the Green Revolution; Sonnenfeld, “Mexico’s ‘Green Revolution;’” Soto Laveaga, Jungle Laboratories; Wright, The Death of Ramón González; Lorek, Making the Green Revolution.93. Quoted in Hernández “Arbol afuera,” 187 (My translation).94. USDA, Economic Research Service, “Market Segment”95. Quoted in Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 187 (My translation).96. Hammett, A Concise History of Mexico, 310–311.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine; UC Davis Hemispheric Institute on the Americas; Tinker Foundation.Notes on contributorsViridiana Hernández FernándezViridiana Hernández Fernández is an environmental historian of modern Latin America. Her research interests focus on the many forms in which the transnational movement of people, food commodities, and agricultural technologies change rural landscapes in Latin America. Currently, Dr. Hernández is working on her first book project, “Guacamole Ecosystems: Agriculture, Migration, and Deforestation in Twentieth-Century Mexico,” which challenges the assumption that bureaucrats, scientists, and large-scale farmers were the primary actors in a long path of transformations of the Mexican countryside in the twentieth century.","PeriodicalId":92780,"journal":{"name":"Global food history","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The March of Empire: The Californian Quest for Avocados in Early-Twentieth Century Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Viridiana Hernández Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20549547.2023.2266535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTAt the turn of the twentieth century, agricultural explorers from the United States Department of Agriculture, Californian farmers, and the University of California scientists created the agricultural giant that California is today by extracting plant diversity from the Global South and protecting the nascent agricultural industry from outside competition. I define this process as “U.S. agricultural imperialism.” This article analyzes how U.S. agricultural imperialism in early-twentieth-century Latin America gave rise to a lucrative avocado industry closely associated with the Californian landscapes and agricultural identity and disconnected the fruit from its biological and cultural origins in Mexico and Central America to protect local production. U.S. institutions, growers, and scientists developed a thriving industry in the Golden State based on the extraction of avocado germplasm from Latin America while simultaneously banning the introduction of actual Mexican avocados to avoid outside competition.KEYWORDS: Avocadoplant-breedingexplorersCaliforniaagricultural imperialism AcknowledgmentsI wish to show my appreciation to the scholars and students of the UC Davis Latin American History Workshop for their generous feedback in the early stages of writing this article. I would also like to thank Dr. Erika Rappaport, Dr. Jeffrey Pilcher, and Elizabeth Schmidt for helping me finalize the project and the anonymous readers’ gen erous comments. Their suggestions significantly enriched this piece. This research received grant support from the UC Davis Hemispheric Institute on the Americas, the Tinker Foundation, and the Consortium for History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.Notes1. Olmstead and Rhode, Creating Abundance, 223.2. Although it is unclear how the term “alligator pear” was used in the first place, scholars believe it was because of the fruit’s shell resemblance with the alligator’s skin and the avocado shape of a pear. In 1941, the American Pomological Society and the USDA approved the term “avocado” as the translation to the Náhuatl-origin word ahuácatl (aguacate in Spanish).3. Olmstead and Rhode, “A History of California Agriculture,” 21.4. For wages, land, and transportation costs in twentieth-century California’s agricultural system, see Olmstead and Rhode, “A History of California Agriculture”5. Conkin, A Revolution Down on the Farm; Cochrane, Development of American Agriculture; Fitzgerald, Every Farm a Factory; Sackman, Orange Empire; Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage; Knight, Tropics of Hopes.6. Harris, Fruits of Eden; Stone, The Food Explorer; Gardner, American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century.7. Pauly, Fruits and Plains.8. Kloppenburg, First the Seed.9. Fullilove, The Profit of the Earth, 220.10. Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage; Stoll, “Insects and Institutions;” Knight, Tropic of Hopes.11. Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage; Knight, Tropic of Hopes.12. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 53.13. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 127.14. Barrett, “The Pilgrimage to Atlixco,” 42.15. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 55. The diversity of avocado strains in California at the turn of the twentieth century was not exclusive to this fruit. Californian nurseries imported different kinds of trees, like oranges, grapevines, pears, and apples, from abroad in vast numbers. Steve Stoll mentions that “between 1810 and 1942, approximately 570 species and varieties of trees -not shrubs, bulbs, vines, or flowers, but trees alone -entered California. Species and varieties of vines imported during the same period numbered 260,” in Stoll, “Insects and Institutions,” 217.16. McCook, States of Nature, Sharma, Empire’s Garden, Bender, “The Delectable and Dangerous.”17. Hayland, “History of U.S. Plant Introduction,” 27–28.18. Ibid., 26.19. Phillips et al. “Reflections on the United States Department of Agriculture,” 318.20. Quoted in Hayland, “History of U.S. Plant Introduction,” 28.21. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 5.22. Phillips et al., “Reflections on the United States Department of Agriculture,” 350–351.23. For a thorough study of bananas’ consumption in the United States, see Soluri, Banana Cultures.24. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 200.25. Tucker, Insatiable Appetite.26. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 79–81.27. Soto Laveaga, Jungle Laboratories, 10.28. Fairchild, “Our Plants Immigrants,” National Geographic Magazine, 179 (Emphasis added).29. Sackman, Orange Empire, chap. 1, Kindle.30. Knight, Tropics of Hope, 14.31. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 82–116.32. Collins, The Avocado, A Salad Fruit from the Tropics.33. Ibid., 28.34. Ibid., 29–35.35. Ibid., 41.36. For the Maya culture, the avocados were also grown in sacred gardens, and they even formed part of their mythology as Maya people believed that important ancestors became reborn through fruit trees, like the avocado.37. For more on avocado domestication in Mesoamerica, see Galindo-Tovar et al., “Some Aspects of Avocado Diversity and Domestication”38. Ibid., 41–42.39. Ibid., 44.40. Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 40.41. Acquaah, Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding, 146.42. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 205.43. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 97.44. Ibid.45. Quoted in Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 10 (Emphasis added).46. Stoll, “Insects and Institutions,” 217.47. Phillips et al., “Reflections on the United States Department of Agriculture,” 351.48. Stoll, “Insects and Institutions,” 218.49. Sackman, Orange Empire, chap 1 Kindle.50. Quoted in Ibid.51. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 205.52. Quoted in Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 43.53. McCook, States of Nature, 26.54. Ibid.55. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 199.56. Ibid., 200.57. California Avocado Association, “Fourth Annual Meeting,” 75 (italics in original); California Avocado Association, “Report of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 66.58. California Avocado Association, “Report of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 67.59. Ibid.60. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 21–22.61. Ibid., 22.62. Ibid.63. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 208.64. Knight, Tropic of Hopes, 83.65. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 59–61.66. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 209.67. Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 58.68. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 145.69. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 74.70. Ibid., 75–76.71. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 57.72. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 153.73. Knight, Tropics of Hopes, 92.74. Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage, 64.75. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 90.76. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 212.77. Ibid.78. Ibid., 211.79. Ibid., 213.80. Ibid., 213–214.81. Mexican migration numbers cited in Lytle Hernandez, Bad Mexicans, 208.82. Ibid., 214. Calavo even won the plaudits of Business Week in 1935 in an article titled “Calavo Growers Star as Sellers.”83. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 160–162.84. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 156.85. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 16.86. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 161–162.87. Quoted in Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 137.88. See Aluja at al., Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 293–309.89. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 165.90. Quoted in Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 129.91. Webber, “Honoring the Parent Tree” in California Avocado Association, Yearbook, 49–53.92. The term “Green Revolution” refers to the agricultural projects that mechanized agriculture, propagated the use of agrochemicals and fossil fuels, and increased food production by breeding high-yielding crop varieties in the mid-twentieth century. For more on the Green Revolution in Mexico and other countries in Latin America see Fitzgerald, “Exporting American Agriculture;” Garrard-Burnett, Lawrence, and Moreno, Beyond the Eagle’s Shadow; Olsson, Agrarian Crossings; Perkins, Geopolitics and the Green Revolution; Sonnenfeld, “Mexico’s ‘Green Revolution;’” Soto Laveaga, Jungle Laboratories; Wright, The Death of Ramón González; Lorek, Making the Green Revolution.93. Quoted in Hernández “Arbol afuera,” 187 (My translation).94. USDA, Economic Research Service, “Market Segment”95. Quoted in Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 187 (My translation).96. Hammett, A Concise History of Mexico, 310–311.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine; UC Davis Hemispheric Institute on the Americas; Tinker Foundation.Notes on contributorsViridiana Hernández FernándezViridiana Hernández Fernández is an environmental historian of modern Latin America. Her research interests focus on the many forms in which the transnational movement of people, food commodities, and agricultural technologies change rural landscapes in Latin America. Currently, Dr. Hernández is working on her first book project, “Guacamole Ecosystems: Agriculture, Migration, and Deforestation in Twentieth-Century Mexico,” which challenges the assumption that bureaucrats, scientists, and large-scale farmers were the primary actors in a long path of transformations of the Mexican countryside in the twentieth century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92780,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global food history\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global food history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20549547.2023.2266535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global food history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20549547.2023.2266535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪之交,来自美国农业部的农业探险家、加州农民和加州大学的科学家通过从全球南方提取植物多样性和保护新生的农业产业免受外部竞争,创造了今天加州的农业巨人。我把这个过程定义为“美国农业帝国主义。”本文分析了美国农业帝国主义在二十世纪早期的拉丁美洲是如何使牛油果产业与加利福尼亚的风景和农业特征密切相关,并将这种水果与墨西哥和中美洲的生物和文化起源分离开来,以保护当地生产的。美国的机构、种植者和科学家在金州发展了一个繁荣的产业,以从拉丁美洲提取牛油果种质为基础,同时禁止引进真正的墨西哥牛油果,以避免外部竞争。致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢我还要感谢Erika Rappaport博士、Jeffrey Pilcher博士和Elizabeth Schmidt博士帮助我完成这个项目,以及匿名读者的慷慨评论。他们的建议大大丰富了这篇文章。这项研究得到了加州大学戴维斯分校美洲半球研究所、Tinker基金会和科学、技术和医学史联合会的资助。奥姆斯特德和罗德,创造富足,223.2。虽然尚不清楚“鳄鱼梨”一词最初是如何使用的,但学者们认为这是因为这种水果的外壳与鳄鱼的皮肤相似,而且梨的鳄梨形状。1941年,美国水果学会和美国农业部批准将“鳄梨”一词翻译为Náhuatl-origin(西班牙语为aguacate) ahuácatl。奥姆斯特德和罗德,《加利福尼亚农业史》,21.4。关于20世纪加州农业系统的工资、土地和运输成本,见奥姆斯特德和罗德合著的《加州农业史》。康金:《农场上的革命》;科克伦:《美国农业发展》;菲茨杰拉德《每个农场都是工厂》;萨克曼,橙色帝国;斯托尔:《自然优势的果实》;奈特,《希望的热带》。哈里斯,《伊甸园的果实》;斯通,食物探索者;加德纳:《二十世纪的美国农业》。《水果与平原》。Kloppenburg,第一个种子。《地球的利益》,2010年。斯托尔:《自然优势的果实》;斯托尔,<昆虫与制度>,奈特,《希望回归线》,第11页。斯托尔:《自然优势的果实》;骑士,《希望回归线》。Kerr,“南加州的鳄梨产业”,53.13。Hernández,“Arbol afuera”,127.14。巴雷特,《阿利克斯科之旅》,42.15页。克尔,《南加州的鳄梨产业》,55页。20世纪初,加州牛油果品种的多样性并不是这种水果所独有的。加州的苗圃从国外大量进口不同种类的树木,如橘子、葡萄藤、梨和苹果。史蒂夫·斯托尔提到,“在1810年至1942年间,大约有570种树木和品种——不是灌木、球茎、藤蔓或花卉,而是树木——进入了加州。同期进口的葡萄品种和品种有260种”,见Stoll,“昆虫和制度”,217.16。麦库克,《自然的状态》,夏尔马,《帝国的花园》,本德,《快乐与危险》17。Hayland,《美国植物引种史》27-28.18。如上,26.19。Phillips等人,“对美国农业部的反思”,318.20。引自Hayland,“美国植物引种史”,28.21。Egli,《我们梦想的世界》,5.22。Phillips等人,“对美国农业部的反思”,350-351.23。关于美国香蕉消费的深入研究,见Soluri的《香蕉文化》。《在鳄梨酱中寻找黄金》,2002年第25期。塔克,贪得无厌的胃口。Egli,“我们梦想的世界”,79-81.27。索托拉瓦加,丛林实验室,10.28。费尔柴尔德,“我们的植物移民”,《国家地理杂志》,179页(加注),第29页。萨克曼,《橙色帝国》,第一章,kindle版。奈特,《希望的热带》,14.31页。Egli,“我们梦想的世界”,82-116.32。《鳄梨,一种来自热带地区的沙拉水果》。如上,28.34。如上,29 - 35.35。如上,41.36。在玛雅文化中,牛油果也生长在神圣的花园里,它们甚至成为玛雅神话的一部分,因为玛雅人相信重要的祖先通过像牛油果这样的果树获得重生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The March of Empire: The Californian Quest for Avocados in Early-Twentieth Century Mexico
ABSTRACTAt the turn of the twentieth century, agricultural explorers from the United States Department of Agriculture, Californian farmers, and the University of California scientists created the agricultural giant that California is today by extracting plant diversity from the Global South and protecting the nascent agricultural industry from outside competition. I define this process as “U.S. agricultural imperialism.” This article analyzes how U.S. agricultural imperialism in early-twentieth-century Latin America gave rise to a lucrative avocado industry closely associated with the Californian landscapes and agricultural identity and disconnected the fruit from its biological and cultural origins in Mexico and Central America to protect local production. U.S. institutions, growers, and scientists developed a thriving industry in the Golden State based on the extraction of avocado germplasm from Latin America while simultaneously banning the introduction of actual Mexican avocados to avoid outside competition.KEYWORDS: Avocadoplant-breedingexplorersCaliforniaagricultural imperialism AcknowledgmentsI wish to show my appreciation to the scholars and students of the UC Davis Latin American History Workshop for their generous feedback in the early stages of writing this article. I would also like to thank Dr. Erika Rappaport, Dr. Jeffrey Pilcher, and Elizabeth Schmidt for helping me finalize the project and the anonymous readers’ gen erous comments. Their suggestions significantly enriched this piece. This research received grant support from the UC Davis Hemispheric Institute on the Americas, the Tinker Foundation, and the Consortium for History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.Notes1. Olmstead and Rhode, Creating Abundance, 223.2. Although it is unclear how the term “alligator pear” was used in the first place, scholars believe it was because of the fruit’s shell resemblance with the alligator’s skin and the avocado shape of a pear. In 1941, the American Pomological Society and the USDA approved the term “avocado” as the translation to the Náhuatl-origin word ahuácatl (aguacate in Spanish).3. Olmstead and Rhode, “A History of California Agriculture,” 21.4. For wages, land, and transportation costs in twentieth-century California’s agricultural system, see Olmstead and Rhode, “A History of California Agriculture”5. Conkin, A Revolution Down on the Farm; Cochrane, Development of American Agriculture; Fitzgerald, Every Farm a Factory; Sackman, Orange Empire; Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage; Knight, Tropics of Hopes.6. Harris, Fruits of Eden; Stone, The Food Explorer; Gardner, American Agriculture in the Twentieth Century.7. Pauly, Fruits and Plains.8. Kloppenburg, First the Seed.9. Fullilove, The Profit of the Earth, 220.10. Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage; Stoll, “Insects and Institutions;” Knight, Tropic of Hopes.11. Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage; Knight, Tropic of Hopes.12. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 53.13. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 127.14. Barrett, “The Pilgrimage to Atlixco,” 42.15. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 55. The diversity of avocado strains in California at the turn of the twentieth century was not exclusive to this fruit. Californian nurseries imported different kinds of trees, like oranges, grapevines, pears, and apples, from abroad in vast numbers. Steve Stoll mentions that “between 1810 and 1942, approximately 570 species and varieties of trees -not shrubs, bulbs, vines, or flowers, but trees alone -entered California. Species and varieties of vines imported during the same period numbered 260,” in Stoll, “Insects and Institutions,” 217.16. McCook, States of Nature, Sharma, Empire’s Garden, Bender, “The Delectable and Dangerous.”17. Hayland, “History of U.S. Plant Introduction,” 27–28.18. Ibid., 26.19. Phillips et al. “Reflections on the United States Department of Agriculture,” 318.20. Quoted in Hayland, “History of U.S. Plant Introduction,” 28.21. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 5.22. Phillips et al., “Reflections on the United States Department of Agriculture,” 350–351.23. For a thorough study of bananas’ consumption in the United States, see Soluri, Banana Cultures.24. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 200.25. Tucker, Insatiable Appetite.26. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 79–81.27. Soto Laveaga, Jungle Laboratories, 10.28. Fairchild, “Our Plants Immigrants,” National Geographic Magazine, 179 (Emphasis added).29. Sackman, Orange Empire, chap. 1, Kindle.30. Knight, Tropics of Hope, 14.31. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 82–116.32. Collins, The Avocado, A Salad Fruit from the Tropics.33. Ibid., 28.34. Ibid., 29–35.35. Ibid., 41.36. For the Maya culture, the avocados were also grown in sacred gardens, and they even formed part of their mythology as Maya people believed that important ancestors became reborn through fruit trees, like the avocado.37. For more on avocado domestication in Mesoamerica, see Galindo-Tovar et al., “Some Aspects of Avocado Diversity and Domestication”38. Ibid., 41–42.39. Ibid., 44.40. Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 40.41. Acquaah, Principles of Plant Genetics and Breeding, 146.42. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 205.43. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 97.44. Ibid.45. Quoted in Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 10 (Emphasis added).46. Stoll, “Insects and Institutions,” 217.47. Phillips et al., “Reflections on the United States Department of Agriculture,” 351.48. Stoll, “Insects and Institutions,” 218.49. Sackman, Orange Empire, chap 1 Kindle.50. Quoted in Ibid.51. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 205.52. Quoted in Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 43.53. McCook, States of Nature, 26.54. Ibid.55. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 199.56. Ibid., 200.57. California Avocado Association, “Fourth Annual Meeting,” 75 (italics in original); California Avocado Association, “Report of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 66.58. California Avocado Association, “Report of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 67.59. Ibid.60. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 21–22.61. Ibid., 22.62. Ibid.63. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 208.64. Knight, Tropic of Hopes, 83.65. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 59–61.66. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 209.67. Rosengarten, Wilson Popenoe, 58.68. Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 145.69. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 74.70. Ibid., 75–76.71. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 57.72. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 153.73. Knight, Tropics of Hopes, 92.74. Stoll, The Fruits of Natural Advantage, 64.75. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 90.76. Charles, “Searching for Gold in Guacamole,” 212.77. Ibid.78. Ibid., 211.79. Ibid., 213.80. Ibid., 213–214.81. Mexican migration numbers cited in Lytle Hernandez, Bad Mexicans, 208.82. Ibid., 214. Calavo even won the plaudits of Business Week in 1935 in an article titled “Calavo Growers Star as Sellers.”83. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 160–162.84. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 156.85. California Avocado Association, “Minutes of the Semi-Annual Meeting,” 16.86. Kerr, “The Avocado Industry in Southern California,” 161–162.87. Quoted in Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 137.88. See Aluja at al., Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 293–309.89. Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 165.90. Quoted in Egli, “The World of Our Dreams,” 129.91. Webber, “Honoring the Parent Tree” in California Avocado Association, Yearbook, 49–53.92. The term “Green Revolution” refers to the agricultural projects that mechanized agriculture, propagated the use of agrochemicals and fossil fuels, and increased food production by breeding high-yielding crop varieties in the mid-twentieth century. For more on the Green Revolution in Mexico and other countries in Latin America see Fitzgerald, “Exporting American Agriculture;” Garrard-Burnett, Lawrence, and Moreno, Beyond the Eagle’s Shadow; Olsson, Agrarian Crossings; Perkins, Geopolitics and the Green Revolution; Sonnenfeld, “Mexico’s ‘Green Revolution;’” Soto Laveaga, Jungle Laboratories; Wright, The Death of Ramón González; Lorek, Making the Green Revolution.93. Quoted in Hernández “Arbol afuera,” 187 (My translation).94. USDA, Economic Research Service, “Market Segment”95. Quoted in Hernández, “Arbol afuera,” 187 (My translation).96. Hammett, A Concise History of Mexico, 310–311.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Consortium for History of Science, Technology and Medicine; UC Davis Hemispheric Institute on the Americas; Tinker Foundation.Notes on contributorsViridiana Hernández FernándezViridiana Hernández Fernández is an environmental historian of modern Latin America. Her research interests focus on the many forms in which the transnational movement of people, food commodities, and agricultural technologies change rural landscapes in Latin America. Currently, Dr. Hernández is working on her first book project, “Guacamole Ecosystems: Agriculture, Migration, and Deforestation in Twentieth-Century Mexico,” which challenges the assumption that bureaucrats, scientists, and large-scale farmers were the primary actors in a long path of transformations of the Mexican countryside in the twentieth century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信