分析教育哲学:一些建议问题和方向

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Theory and Research in Education Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1177/14778785231206286

Christian Norefalk, Marianna Papastephanou

{"title":"分析教育哲学:一些建议问题和方向","authors":"Christian Norefalk, Marianna Papastephanou","doi":"10.1177/14778785231206286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article investigates whether there is any place for the school of thought that is known as analytic philosophy of education in the aftermath of postmodernism, and whether analytic philosophy of education can be treated as a ‘method’, among other alternative ‘methods’, that can be applied regardless of what kind of ‘-ism’ or ideology one embraces. An additional aim is to suggest some important questions for analytic philosophy of education to take into consideration. We argue that conceptual engineering may be a promising avenue for analytic educational theory if it is used with a critical intent that is more heuristic and inconclusive than prescriptively ideal.","PeriodicalId":46679,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analytic philosophy of education: Some suggested questions and directions\",\"authors\":\"Christian Norefalk, Marianna Papastephanou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14778785231206286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article investigates whether there is any place for the school of thought that is known as analytic philosophy of education in the aftermath of postmodernism, and whether analytic philosophy of education can be treated as a ‘method’, among other alternative ‘methods’, that can be applied regardless of what kind of ‘-ism’ or ideology one embraces. An additional aim is to suggest some important questions for analytic philosophy of education to take into consideration. We argue that conceptual engineering may be a promising avenue for analytic educational theory if it is used with a critical intent that is more heuristic and inconclusive than prescriptively ideal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Research in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785231206286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14778785231206286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了在后现代主义的余波中，被称为分析教育哲学的思想流派是否有一席之地，以及分析教育哲学是否可以被视为一种“方法”，在其他“方法”中，可以被应用于任何一种“主义”或意识形态。另一个目的是提出一些重要的问题，供分析教育哲学考虑。我们认为，概念工程可能是分析教育理论的一个有前途的途径，如果它与一个批判性的意图一起使用，它比规范性的理想更具有启发式和非结论性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Analytic philosophy of education: Some suggested questions and directions

This article investigates whether there is any place for the school of thought that is known as analytic philosophy of education in the aftermath of postmodernism, and whether analytic philosophy of education can be treated as a ‘method’, among other alternative ‘methods’, that can be applied regardless of what kind of ‘-ism’ or ideology one embraces. An additional aim is to suggest some important questions for analytic philosophy of education to take into consideration. We argue that conceptual engineering may be a promising avenue for analytic educational theory if it is used with a critical intent that is more heuristic and inconclusive than prescriptively ideal.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Theory and Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Theory and Research in Education, formerly known as The School Field, is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes theoretical, empirical and conjectural papers contributing to the development of educational theory, policy and practice.