跟随领导者:在2019年英国大选期间检查启发式在政治社交媒体广告中的使用

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Tom M. Holloway, Colin A. Hendrie
{"title":"跟随领导者:在2019年英国大选期间检查启发式在政治社交媒体广告中的使用","authors":"Tom M. Holloway, Colin A. Hendrie","doi":"10.1080/15377857.2023.2236966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal, the role that social media advertising can play in the outcomes of major elections is increasingly evident. While existing political advertising research has examined the influence of such adverts in contemporary election campaigns, there has been comparatively less research on the actual elements that make these adverts successful. The current study considers the extent to which different aspects of the political brand contribute to this success, particularly the use of the party leader as a heuristic device for voters and the strategic use of the “doppelgänger brand” phenomenon to undermine the opponent party’s campaign. By examining the adverts published on Facebook by the Conservative party and the Labour party in three key phases of the 2019 UK General Election, the importance of these two branding aspects in political social media advertising is investigated. The results show that the party that won the election, the Conservatives, made far greater use of both the leader heuristic and the doppelgänger brand phenomenon in their election adverts, and subtleties within the results reveal a novel finding for the use of the leader heuristic against the opponent party leader. The results are discussed in the context of election news coverage from 2019, and the ethical implications of treating deceptive campaigning techniques as successful are considered. The potential for the heuristics to be more powerful on alternative social media platforms with shorter-length content is also discussed as an avenue for future research to pursue.","PeriodicalId":46259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Political Marketing","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Follow the Leader: Examining the Use of Heuristics in Political Social Media Advertising During the 2019 UK General Election\",\"authors\":\"Tom M. Holloway, Colin A. Hendrie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15377857.2023.2236966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal, the role that social media advertising can play in the outcomes of major elections is increasingly evident. While existing political advertising research has examined the influence of such adverts in contemporary election campaigns, there has been comparatively less research on the actual elements that make these adverts successful. The current study considers the extent to which different aspects of the political brand contribute to this success, particularly the use of the party leader as a heuristic device for voters and the strategic use of the “doppelgänger brand” phenomenon to undermine the opponent party’s campaign. By examining the adverts published on Facebook by the Conservative party and the Labour party in three key phases of the 2019 UK General Election, the importance of these two branding aspects in political social media advertising is investigated. The results show that the party that won the election, the Conservatives, made far greater use of both the leader heuristic and the doppelgänger brand phenomenon in their election adverts, and subtleties within the results reveal a novel finding for the use of the leader heuristic against the opponent party leader. The results are discussed in the context of election news coverage from 2019, and the ethical implications of treating deceptive campaigning techniques as successful are considered. The potential for the heuristics to be more powerful on alternative social media platforms with shorter-length content is also discussed as an avenue for future research to pursue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Political Marketing\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Political Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2023.2236966\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Political Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2023.2236966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在facebook与剑桥分析公司(cambridge Analytica)的丑闻之后,社交媒体广告在重大选举结果中可能发挥的作用越来越明显。虽然现有的政治广告研究已经考察了这类广告在当代竞选活动中的影响,但对这些广告成功的实际因素的研究相对较少。目前的研究考虑了政治品牌的不同方面对这种成功的贡献程度,特别是使用政党领导人作为选民的启发式工具,以及战略性地使用“doppelgänger品牌”现象来破坏对手党的竞选活动。通过研究2019年英国大选的三个关键阶段保守党和工党在Facebook上发布的广告,研究了这两个品牌方面在政治社交媒体广告中的重要性。结果显示,赢得选举的保守党在他们的选举广告中更多地使用了领袖启发式和doppelgänger品牌现象,结果中的微妙之处揭示了一个使用领袖启发式来对付对手政党领袖的新发现。研究结果在2019年选举新闻报道的背景下进行了讨论,并考虑了将欺骗性竞选技术视为成功的伦理影响。在具有较短内容的替代社交媒体平台上,启发式更强大的潜力也被讨论为未来研究的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Follow the Leader: Examining the Use of Heuristics in Political Social Media Advertising During the 2019 UK General Election
Following the Facebook-Cambridge Analytica scandal, the role that social media advertising can play in the outcomes of major elections is increasingly evident. While existing political advertising research has examined the influence of such adverts in contemporary election campaigns, there has been comparatively less research on the actual elements that make these adverts successful. The current study considers the extent to which different aspects of the political brand contribute to this success, particularly the use of the party leader as a heuristic device for voters and the strategic use of the “doppelgänger brand” phenomenon to undermine the opponent party’s campaign. By examining the adverts published on Facebook by the Conservative party and the Labour party in three key phases of the 2019 UK General Election, the importance of these two branding aspects in political social media advertising is investigated. The results show that the party that won the election, the Conservatives, made far greater use of both the leader heuristic and the doppelgänger brand phenomenon in their election adverts, and subtleties within the results reveal a novel finding for the use of the leader heuristic against the opponent party leader. The results are discussed in the context of election news coverage from 2019, and the ethical implications of treating deceptive campaigning techniques as successful are considered. The potential for the heuristics to be more powerful on alternative social media platforms with shorter-length content is also discussed as an avenue for future research to pursue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Political Marketing
Journal of Political Marketing POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Journal of Political Marketing aims to be the leading scholarly journal examining the latest developments in the application of marketing methods to politics. As the political world becomes more complex and interwoven, it is imperative for all interested parties to stay abreast of “cutting edge” tools that are used in unique and different ways in countries around the world. The journal goes beyond the application of advertising to politics to study various strategic marketing tools such as: Voter segmentation Candidate positioning Use of multivariate statistical modeling to better understand the thinking and choices made by voters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信