有无课程材料支持的基础科学教师长期在职培训后的工程整合

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nilay Ozturk, Sevgi AYDIN-Günbatar, Gillian H. Roehrig
{"title":"有无课程材料支持的基础科学教师长期在职培训后的工程整合","authors":"Nilay Ozturk, Sevgi AYDIN-Günbatar, Gillian H. Roehrig","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2023.2260996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTBackground and Purpose As a response to the need for effective engineering integration in K-12 science classrooms, teachers should be supported with rich professional development (PD) with diverse components (e.g. curriculum material support). Grounded in the framework for quality K-12 engineering education, this study explores how elementary science teachers integrated engineering into science lessons after participating in PD and the nature of engineering integration with additional curriculum material support (CMS).Design/Method In this single-case study with multiple embedded units of analysis, three teachers’ 79 classroom video recordings were analyzed using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Engineering Design with the engineering design process and engineering habits of mind components.Findings Analysis showed that teachers spent time on each design component in both PD Year and CMS Year, with an increase for at least half of the components in the CMS Year. Across all the observations in both years, the most common engineering design process component was researching possible solutions to the engineering challenge. Compared to the PD Year, teachers’ engineering habits of mind integration improved greatly in the CMS Year. Regarding engineering design and science concepts integration, observations became more balanced, moving away from the independent ends of the continuum in the CMS Year.Conclusions Long-term PD was effective in supporting teachers’ integration of engineering design components. Providing CMS had the greatest impact on the integration of engineering habits of mind components. Along with PD, curriculum support with explicit indication of how and when to incorporate engineering with habits of mind components was beneficial for teachers.KEYWORDS: Integrated STEM educationengineering integrationprofessional developmentcurriculum material support AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Numbers DRL-1238140 and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK 2219 Program). The findings, conclusions, and opinions herein represent the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view of personnel affiliated with the National Science Foundation and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the National Science Foundation and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye.","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":"240 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elementary science teachers’ engineering integration after long-term in-service training program with and without curriculum material support\",\"authors\":\"Nilay Ozturk, Sevgi AYDIN-Günbatar, Gillian H. Roehrig\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02635143.2023.2260996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTBackground and Purpose As a response to the need for effective engineering integration in K-12 science classrooms, teachers should be supported with rich professional development (PD) with diverse components (e.g. curriculum material support). Grounded in the framework for quality K-12 engineering education, this study explores how elementary science teachers integrated engineering into science lessons after participating in PD and the nature of engineering integration with additional curriculum material support (CMS).Design/Method In this single-case study with multiple embedded units of analysis, three teachers’ 79 classroom video recordings were analyzed using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Engineering Design with the engineering design process and engineering habits of mind components.Findings Analysis showed that teachers spent time on each design component in both PD Year and CMS Year, with an increase for at least half of the components in the CMS Year. Across all the observations in both years, the most common engineering design process component was researching possible solutions to the engineering challenge. Compared to the PD Year, teachers’ engineering habits of mind integration improved greatly in the CMS Year. Regarding engineering design and science concepts integration, observations became more balanced, moving away from the independent ends of the continuum in the CMS Year.Conclusions Long-term PD was effective in supporting teachers’ integration of engineering design components. Providing CMS had the greatest impact on the integration of engineering habits of mind components. Along with PD, curriculum support with explicit indication of how and when to incorporate engineering with habits of mind components was beneficial for teachers.KEYWORDS: Integrated STEM educationengineering integrationprofessional developmentcurriculum material support AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Numbers DRL-1238140 and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK 2219 Program). The findings, conclusions, and opinions herein represent the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view of personnel affiliated with the National Science Foundation and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the National Science Foundation and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"volume\":\"240 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2260996\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2260996","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【摘要】背景与目的为满足K-12科学课堂对有效的工程整合的需求,教师应得到丰富的专业发展(PD)支持,包括课程材料支持等多种组成部分。本研究以高质量的K-12工程教育框架为基础,探讨了小学科学教师在参与PD后如何将工程整合到科学课程中,以及工程整合与额外课程材料支持(CMS)的本质。设计/方法在这个具有多个嵌入式分析单元的单案例研究中,使用《工程设计课堂观察协议》对三位教师的79个课堂视频进行了分析,其中包含工程设计过程和思维组件的工程习惯。结果分析显示,教师在PD年和CMS年的每个设计组件上花费的时间,在CMS年至少增加了一半的组件。在这两年的所有观察中,最常见的工程设计过程组成部分是研究工程挑战的可能解决方案。与PD年相比,CMS年教师的工程思维整合习惯有了很大的提高。在工程设计和科学概念的整合方面,观测变得更加平衡,在CMS年从连续体的独立两端移开。结论长期PD能有效支持教师整合工程设计要素。提供CMS对工程思维习惯组件的集成影响最大。与PD一起,课程支持明确指出如何以及何时将工程学与思维习惯成分结合起来,这对教师是有益的。关键词:综合STEM教育工程集成专业发展课程材料支持致谢本工作由国家科学基金(奖励号DRL-1238140)和土耳其科学技术研究委员会(TUBITAK 2219计划)资助。本文的发现、结论和观点仅代表作者的观点,并不一定代表美国国家科学基金会和土耳其科学技术研究委员会相关人员的观点。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。这项工作得到了国家科学基金会和土耳其科学技术研究委员会的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elementary science teachers’ engineering integration after long-term in-service training program with and without curriculum material support
ABSTRACTBackground and Purpose As a response to the need for effective engineering integration in K-12 science classrooms, teachers should be supported with rich professional development (PD) with diverse components (e.g. curriculum material support). Grounded in the framework for quality K-12 engineering education, this study explores how elementary science teachers integrated engineering into science lessons after participating in PD and the nature of engineering integration with additional curriculum material support (CMS).Design/Method In this single-case study with multiple embedded units of analysis, three teachers’ 79 classroom video recordings were analyzed using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Engineering Design with the engineering design process and engineering habits of mind components.Findings Analysis showed that teachers spent time on each design component in both PD Year and CMS Year, with an increase for at least half of the components in the CMS Year. Across all the observations in both years, the most common engineering design process component was researching possible solutions to the engineering challenge. Compared to the PD Year, teachers’ engineering habits of mind integration improved greatly in the CMS Year. Regarding engineering design and science concepts integration, observations became more balanced, moving away from the independent ends of the continuum in the CMS Year.Conclusions Long-term PD was effective in supporting teachers’ integration of engineering design components. Providing CMS had the greatest impact on the integration of engineering habits of mind components. Along with PD, curriculum support with explicit indication of how and when to incorporate engineering with habits of mind components was beneficial for teachers.KEYWORDS: Integrated STEM educationengineering integrationprofessional developmentcurriculum material support AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Numbers DRL-1238140 and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUBITAK 2219 Program). The findings, conclusions, and opinions herein represent the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the view of personnel affiliated with the National Science Foundation and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThe work was supported by the National Science Foundation and The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信