发展中国家的流感疫苗合同--协调、灵活性和疫苗覆盖率

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Raunak Joshi, Sumanta Basu, Claudia Rosales, Arnab Adhikari
{"title":"发展中国家的流感疫苗合同--协调、灵活性和疫苗覆盖率","authors":"Raunak Joshi,&nbsp;Sumanta Basu,&nbsp;Claudia Rosales,&nbsp;Arnab Adhikari","doi":"10.1111/deci.12615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We study different contract mechanisms between a vaccine manufacturer (VM) and a vaccine procurement agency (VPA) to coordinate the two-peak influenza vaccine supply chain. Motivated by the prevalent industry contracts, we study two hybrid contracts under budget constraints, which allow flexibility in deciding the contractual parameters between the VM and the VPA. We consider the case of both private (for-profit) and public (not-for-profit) VPA and the impact of different objectives, such as profit and vaccine coverage, on contract choice. We show that for public VPAs or for private VPAs with low available budget, both hybrid contracts are equally preferred by VM and VPA. However, under high budget, the preferences of VPA and VM will differ. We then extend our models to consider the case of both private and public VPA coexisting in the market under both budget and vaccine availability constraints. Contrary to intuition, we find that the vaccine coverage provided by the public VPA is not always higher than the vaccine coverage provided by the private VPA, with the private VPA providing greater vaccine coverage under conditions of low budget and low vaccine availability. Our findings have important policy implications for governments of emerging economies with limited budget for mass vaccination programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"55 5","pages":"436-455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influenza vaccine contracts in developing nations—Coordination, flexibility, and vaccine coverage\",\"authors\":\"Raunak Joshi,&nbsp;Sumanta Basu,&nbsp;Claudia Rosales,&nbsp;Arnab Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/deci.12615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We study different contract mechanisms between a vaccine manufacturer (VM) and a vaccine procurement agency (VPA) to coordinate the two-peak influenza vaccine supply chain. Motivated by the prevalent industry contracts, we study two hybrid contracts under budget constraints, which allow flexibility in deciding the contractual parameters between the VM and the VPA. We consider the case of both private (for-profit) and public (not-for-profit) VPA and the impact of different objectives, such as profit and vaccine coverage, on contract choice. We show that for public VPAs or for private VPAs with low available budget, both hybrid contracts are equally preferred by VM and VPA. However, under high budget, the preferences of VPA and VM will differ. We then extend our models to consider the case of both private and public VPA coexisting in the market under both budget and vaccine availability constraints. Contrary to intuition, we find that the vaccine coverage provided by the public VPA is not always higher than the vaccine coverage provided by the private VPA, with the private VPA providing greater vaccine coverage under conditions of low budget and low vaccine availability. Our findings have important policy implications for governments of emerging economies with limited budget for mass vaccination programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"436-455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12615\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了疫苗制造商(VM)和疫苗采购机构(VPA)之间的不同合同机制,以协调两峰流感疫苗供应链。受流行的行业合同的启发,我们研究了预算约束下的两种混合合同,它们允许疫苗生产商和疫苗采购代理机构灵活决定合同参数。我们考虑了私营(营利性)和公共(非营利性)VPA 的情况,以及不同目标(如利润和疫苗覆盖率)对合同选择的影响。我们的研究表明,对于公共 VPA 或可用预算较低的私营 VPA,VM 和 VPA 同样偏好两种混合合同。然而,在高预算条件下,VPA 和 VM 的偏好会有所不同。然后,我们扩展模型,考虑在预算和疫苗可用性限制下,私营和公共 VPA 在市场上共存的情况。与直觉相反,我们发现公共 VPA 提供的疫苗覆盖率并不总是高于私营 VPA 提供的疫苗覆盖率,在低预算和低疫苗可用性条件下,私营 VPA 提供的疫苗覆盖率更高。我们的研究结果对大规模疫苗接种计划预算有限的新兴经济体政府具有重要的政策意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influenza vaccine contracts in developing nations—Coordination, flexibility, and vaccine coverage

We study different contract mechanisms between a vaccine manufacturer (VM) and a vaccine procurement agency (VPA) to coordinate the two-peak influenza vaccine supply chain. Motivated by the prevalent industry contracts, we study two hybrid contracts under budget constraints, which allow flexibility in deciding the contractual parameters between the VM and the VPA. We consider the case of both private (for-profit) and public (not-for-profit) VPA and the impact of different objectives, such as profit and vaccine coverage, on contract choice. We show that for public VPAs or for private VPAs with low available budget, both hybrid contracts are equally preferred by VM and VPA. However, under high budget, the preferences of VPA and VM will differ. We then extend our models to consider the case of both private and public VPA coexisting in the market under both budget and vaccine availability constraints. Contrary to intuition, we find that the vaccine coverage provided by the public VPA is not always higher than the vaccine coverage provided by the private VPA, with the private VPA providing greater vaccine coverage under conditions of low budget and low vaccine availability. Our findings have important policy implications for governments of emerging economies with limited budget for mass vaccination programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信