全纳教育政策——遵守、遗漏和混淆的对象:十年来……

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ian Hardy, Stuart Woodcock
{"title":"全纳教育政策——遵守、遗漏和混淆的对象:十年来……","authors":"Ian Hardy, Stuart Woodcock","doi":"10.1080/13603116.2023.2257697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws upon a critical policy analysis approach to examine the state of inclusive education policy in Global North settings over the past decade. Building on an earlier paper on this topic ten years ago, this updated article seeks to explore whether and how inclusion and inclusive education have been understood in varied international, national and sub-national policy settings over time. While it might be anticipated that schooling systems should be more aware and proactive in supporting inclusion within their policies, our findings reveal mixed results. At times, there appears to have been regression in some settings, stagnation in others, as well as moderate progress in other settings in relation to support and advocacy for inclusion in educational policies. In an era of increased attention to a range of issues of inclusion more broadly over the past decade (e.g. marriage equality, gender fluidity, Black Lives Matter, #StopAsianHate), our article cautions against assuming that such movements have somehow led to a more ‘inclusive’ conception of students’ identities and wellbeing in schooling policy. Whether and how teachers can be expected to be more inclusive in their practices in such a variegated policy environment is an area for continued inquiry.","PeriodicalId":48025,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Inclusive Education","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusive education policies – objects of observance, omission, and obfuscation: ten years on …\",\"authors\":\"Ian Hardy, Stuart Woodcock\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13603116.2023.2257697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article draws upon a critical policy analysis approach to examine the state of inclusive education policy in Global North settings over the past decade. Building on an earlier paper on this topic ten years ago, this updated article seeks to explore whether and how inclusion and inclusive education have been understood in varied international, national and sub-national policy settings over time. While it might be anticipated that schooling systems should be more aware and proactive in supporting inclusion within their policies, our findings reveal mixed results. At times, there appears to have been regression in some settings, stagnation in others, as well as moderate progress in other settings in relation to support and advocacy for inclusion in educational policies. In an era of increased attention to a range of issues of inclusion more broadly over the past decade (e.g. marriage equality, gender fluidity, Black Lives Matter, #StopAsianHate), our article cautions against assuming that such movements have somehow led to a more ‘inclusive’ conception of students’ identities and wellbeing in schooling policy. Whether and how teachers can be expected to be more inclusive in their practices in such a variegated policy environment is an area for continued inquiry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Inclusive Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Inclusive Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2257697\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Inclusive Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2023.2257697","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文采用一种批判性的政策分析方法来研究过去十年中全球北方地区包容性教育政策的现状。在十年前关于这一主题的一篇早期论文的基础上,这篇更新的文章试图探讨随着时间的推移,在不同的国际、国家和地方政策环境中是否以及如何理解包容和全纳教育。虽然可以预期,学校系统应该更加意识到并积极主动地在其政策中支持包容性,但我们的研究结果显示,结果好坏参半。有时,在支持和倡导纳入教育政策方面,在某些情况下似乎出现倒退,在另一些情况下则出现停滞,在其他情况下则略有进展。在过去十年中,人们越来越关注一系列更广泛的包容性问题(例如婚姻平等、性别流动性、黑人的命也重要、#StopAsianHate),我们的文章警告说,不要假设这些运动在某种程度上导致了对学生身份和教育政策福祉的更“包容”的概念。在这样一个多样化的政策环境中,能否以及如何期望教师在实践中更具包容性是一个需要继续研究的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inclusive education policies – objects of observance, omission, and obfuscation: ten years on …
This article draws upon a critical policy analysis approach to examine the state of inclusive education policy in Global North settings over the past decade. Building on an earlier paper on this topic ten years ago, this updated article seeks to explore whether and how inclusion and inclusive education have been understood in varied international, national and sub-national policy settings over time. While it might be anticipated that schooling systems should be more aware and proactive in supporting inclusion within their policies, our findings reveal mixed results. At times, there appears to have been regression in some settings, stagnation in others, as well as moderate progress in other settings in relation to support and advocacy for inclusion in educational policies. In an era of increased attention to a range of issues of inclusion more broadly over the past decade (e.g. marriage equality, gender fluidity, Black Lives Matter, #StopAsianHate), our article cautions against assuming that such movements have somehow led to a more ‘inclusive’ conception of students’ identities and wellbeing in schooling policy. Whether and how teachers can be expected to be more inclusive in their practices in such a variegated policy environment is an area for continued inquiry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Inclusive Education
International Journal of Inclusive Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Inclusive Education provides a strategic forum for international and multi-disciplinary dialogue on inclusive education for all educators and educational policy-makers concerned with the form and nature of schools, universities and technical colleges. Papers published are original, refereed, multi-disciplinary research into pedagogies, curricula, organizational structures, policy-making, administration and cultures to include all students in education. The journal does not accept enrolment in school, college or university as a measure of inclusion. The focus is upon the nature of exclusion and on research, policy and practices that generate greater options for all people in education and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信