探索学校中身体约束的观点:学生的经验,与工作人员的关系,以及替代策略

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Bethany Hodgkiss, Emma Harding
{"title":"探索学校中身体约束的观点:学生的经验,与工作人员的关系,以及替代策略","authors":"Bethany Hodgkiss, Emma Harding","doi":"10.1080/02667363.2023.2258788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTPhysical restraint is a restrictive practice used in schools, but there are no up-to-date statistics concerning the frequency of its usage in England and there are concerns as to whether it is being used appropriately and effectively. Pupils with special educational needs are more likely to experience physical restraint in school, but opportunities for them to share their views through research are limited. Through semi-structured interviews, four primary-aged pupils from a specialist social, emotional and mental health (SEMH) educational setting shared their experiences of physical restraint, its impact on their relationships with staff members, and alternative strategies. Overall, participants had negative experiences of physical restraint, highlighting that it should be used for safety, but not for minor incidents. All participants identified useful alternative strategies that helped them to feel calmer. The ability to separate negative emotions associated with physical restraint and supporting staff members varied between participants. The findings are discussed in relation to implications for educational psychology practice and future research.KEYWORDS: Physical restraintpupil viewsrelationshipsalternative strategieshuman rights Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis project was funded through England’s Department for Education (DfE) National College for Teaching and Learning (NCTL) ITEP award 2020-2022.","PeriodicalId":45942,"journal":{"name":"Educational Psychology in Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring views of physical restraint in schools: pupil experiences, relationships with staff, and alternative strategies\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Hodgkiss, Emma Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02667363.2023.2258788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTPhysical restraint is a restrictive practice used in schools, but there are no up-to-date statistics concerning the frequency of its usage in England and there are concerns as to whether it is being used appropriately and effectively. Pupils with special educational needs are more likely to experience physical restraint in school, but opportunities for them to share their views through research are limited. Through semi-structured interviews, four primary-aged pupils from a specialist social, emotional and mental health (SEMH) educational setting shared their experiences of physical restraint, its impact on their relationships with staff members, and alternative strategies. Overall, participants had negative experiences of physical restraint, highlighting that it should be used for safety, but not for minor incidents. All participants identified useful alternative strategies that helped them to feel calmer. The ability to separate negative emotions associated with physical restraint and supporting staff members varied between participants. The findings are discussed in relation to implications for educational psychology practice and future research.KEYWORDS: Physical restraintpupil viewsrelationshipsalternative strategieshuman rights Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis project was funded through England’s Department for Education (DfE) National College for Teaching and Learning (NCTL) ITEP award 2020-2022.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Psychology in Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Psychology in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2023.2258788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Psychology in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2023.2258788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要身体约束是学校中使用的一种限制性做法,但在英国没有关于其使用频率的最新统计数据,并且人们担心它是否被适当有效地使用。有特殊教育需要的学生更有可能在学校受到身体约束,但他们通过研究分享观点的机会有限。通过半结构化访谈,四名来自社会、情感和心理健康(SEMH)专业教育机构的小学生分享了他们身体约束的经历、对他们与工作人员关系的影响,以及替代策略。总的来说,参与者有身体约束的负面经历,强调它应该用于安全,但不是用于小事件。所有参与者都确定了有用的替代策略,帮助他们感觉更平静。参与者区分与身体约束和支持性工作人员相关的负面情绪的能力各不相同。研究结果对教育心理学实践和未来研究的意义进行了讨论。关键词:人身约束学生观点关系替代策略人权披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。该项目由英国教育部(DfE)国家教与学学院(NCTL) 2020-2022年ITEP奖资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring views of physical restraint in schools: pupil experiences, relationships with staff, and alternative strategies
ABSTRACTPhysical restraint is a restrictive practice used in schools, but there are no up-to-date statistics concerning the frequency of its usage in England and there are concerns as to whether it is being used appropriately and effectively. Pupils with special educational needs are more likely to experience physical restraint in school, but opportunities for them to share their views through research are limited. Through semi-structured interviews, four primary-aged pupils from a specialist social, emotional and mental health (SEMH) educational setting shared their experiences of physical restraint, its impact on their relationships with staff members, and alternative strategies. Overall, participants had negative experiences of physical restraint, highlighting that it should be used for safety, but not for minor incidents. All participants identified useful alternative strategies that helped them to feel calmer. The ability to separate negative emotions associated with physical restraint and supporting staff members varied between participants. The findings are discussed in relation to implications for educational psychology practice and future research.KEYWORDS: Physical restraintpupil viewsrelationshipsalternative strategieshuman rights Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis project was funded through England’s Department for Education (DfE) National College for Teaching and Learning (NCTL) ITEP award 2020-2022.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Psychology in Practice
Educational Psychology in Practice PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信