为期一天的“职前教师将UDL框架纳入课程设计”研讨会结果

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
K. Alisa Lowrey, Audra Classen, Peter Paprzycki
{"title":"为期一天的“职前教师将UDL框架纳入课程设计”研讨会结果","authors":"K. Alisa Lowrey, Audra Classen, Peter Paprzycki","doi":"10.5590/jerap.2023.13.1.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students with disabilities are increasingly receiving their instruction in inclusive classrooms. General education teachers continue to report a lack of preparation to address their needs. This study examined the impact of a 6-hour professional development seminar on the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework to determine if preservice general and special education teachers’ overall performance in lesson design to reduce barriers, identified through increased attention to student variability, improved. Two lesson plans, preseminar and postseminar, from 242 participants were scored using a modified education field experience (EFE) rubric that included 19 evaluation criteria. A Rasch analysis was used to determine pretest and posttest scoring validity and to enable regression analysis with a continuous outcome variable. Results indicated that the seminar resulted in higher scores for the participants’ postmeasures, controlling for the premeasure effects, as well as unique findings based on subject matter. These findings are presented, as well as implications for future research and practice.","PeriodicalId":42675,"journal":{"name":"Brock Education-A Journal of Educational Research and Practice","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of a One-Day Seminar on Preservice Teachers’ Incorporation of the UDL Framework in Lesson Design\",\"authors\":\"K. Alisa Lowrey, Audra Classen, Peter Paprzycki\",\"doi\":\"10.5590/jerap.2023.13.1.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Students with disabilities are increasingly receiving their instruction in inclusive classrooms. General education teachers continue to report a lack of preparation to address their needs. This study examined the impact of a 6-hour professional development seminar on the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework to determine if preservice general and special education teachers’ overall performance in lesson design to reduce barriers, identified through increased attention to student variability, improved. Two lesson plans, preseminar and postseminar, from 242 participants were scored using a modified education field experience (EFE) rubric that included 19 evaluation criteria. A Rasch analysis was used to determine pretest and posttest scoring validity and to enable regression analysis with a continuous outcome variable. Results indicated that the seminar resulted in higher scores for the participants’ postmeasures, controlling for the premeasure effects, as well as unique findings based on subject matter. These findings are presented, as well as implications for future research and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brock Education-A Journal of Educational Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brock Education-A Journal of Educational Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2023.13.1.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brock Education-A Journal of Educational Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2023.13.1.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

残疾学生越来越多地在包容性教室接受教育。通识教育教师继续报告缺乏满足其需求的准备。本研究考察了为期6小时的专业发展研讨会对通用学习设计(UDL)框架的影响,以确定职前普通教育和特殊教育教师在课程设计方面的整体表现是否得到改善,通过增加对学生可变性的关注来减少障碍。来自242名参与者的两份课程计划,研讨会前和研讨会后,使用修改后的教育实地经验(EFE)标准进行评分,其中包括19项评估标准。使用Rasch分析来确定前测和后测评分效度,并使用连续结果变量进行回归分析。结果表明,在控制前测效应的情况下,研讨会导致参与者的后测得分较高,并且基于主题的独特发现。这些发现,以及对未来的研究和实践的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of a One-Day Seminar on Preservice Teachers’ Incorporation of the UDL Framework in Lesson Design
Students with disabilities are increasingly receiving their instruction in inclusive classrooms. General education teachers continue to report a lack of preparation to address their needs. This study examined the impact of a 6-hour professional development seminar on the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework to determine if preservice general and special education teachers’ overall performance in lesson design to reduce barriers, identified through increased attention to student variability, improved. Two lesson plans, preseminar and postseminar, from 242 participants were scored using a modified education field experience (EFE) rubric that included 19 evaluation criteria. A Rasch analysis was used to determine pretest and posttest scoring validity and to enable regression analysis with a continuous outcome variable. Results indicated that the seminar resulted in higher scores for the participants’ postmeasures, controlling for the premeasure effects, as well as unique findings based on subject matter. These findings are presented, as well as implications for future research and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信