感知到的性别障碍和解决学术领导中性别不平等的建议:MOOC讨论论坛的专题分析

IF 2.4 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Marta Lucchetti, Chang Zhu, Aysun Caliskan
{"title":"感知到的性别障碍和解决学术领导中性别不平等的建议:MOOC讨论论坛的专题分析","authors":"Marta Lucchetti, Chang Zhu, Aysun Caliskan","doi":"10.1080/13603124.2023.2274364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThere is ample evidence of the underrepresentation of women in academic leadership, especially in senior leadership roles. However, there is limited understanding of the barriers they face and the institutional measures that can promote gender equality. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring the perceptions and experiences of academic leaders of different genders and countries. Utilizing a qualitative research approach with a phenomenological design, we analyzed discussions from 75 academic leaders who participated in the LEAD2 MOOC forum on ‘Gender and Academic Leadership’. A thematic analysis of the discussion forum revealed socio-cultural barriers such as gender discrimination, organizational barriers rooted in male-dominated structures, and individual barriers such as work-life conflict. The study also highlights institutional policies and practices, such as unconscious bias training, transparent hiring and promotion criteria, and family-friendly measures, that can mitigate these barriers. The findings not only provide a comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by women in academic leadership but also offer practical recommendations for policymakers and institutions. Finally, this study can serve as a foundation for future academic leadership development programs aimed at empowering female leaders. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectorsNotes on contributorsMarta LucchettiMarta Lucchetti is a Ph.D. candidate and working full-time on her Ph.D. research. Her research interests include educational leadership, educational innovation, educational technologies, and diversity and inclusion in higher education and the school context.Chang ZhuChang Zhu is a full professor in Educational Sciences at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). She is the promoter and principal investigator of several key fundamental research projects in the field of higher education, internationalization, university governance, academic leadership, digital competence, digital pedagogy, educational innovations, online and blended learning, MOOC, ICT-supported learning, and social inclusion in digital learning environments.Aysun CaliskanAysun Caliskan is a postdoctoral researcher in Educational Sciences at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Her research mainly focuses on academic leadership, university governance, organizational culture, and educational innovations.","PeriodicalId":46848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Leadership in Education","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived gender barriers and recommendations for addressing gender inequality in academic leadership: a thematic analysis of MOOC discussion forums\",\"authors\":\"Marta Lucchetti, Chang Zhu, Aysun Caliskan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13603124.2023.2274364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThere is ample evidence of the underrepresentation of women in academic leadership, especially in senior leadership roles. However, there is limited understanding of the barriers they face and the institutional measures that can promote gender equality. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring the perceptions and experiences of academic leaders of different genders and countries. Utilizing a qualitative research approach with a phenomenological design, we analyzed discussions from 75 academic leaders who participated in the LEAD2 MOOC forum on ‘Gender and Academic Leadership’. A thematic analysis of the discussion forum revealed socio-cultural barriers such as gender discrimination, organizational barriers rooted in male-dominated structures, and individual barriers such as work-life conflict. The study also highlights institutional policies and practices, such as unconscious bias training, transparent hiring and promotion criteria, and family-friendly measures, that can mitigate these barriers. The findings not only provide a comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by women in academic leadership but also offer practical recommendations for policymakers and institutions. Finally, this study can serve as a foundation for future academic leadership development programs aimed at empowering female leaders. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectorsNotes on contributorsMarta LucchettiMarta Lucchetti is a Ph.D. candidate and working full-time on her Ph.D. research. Her research interests include educational leadership, educational innovation, educational technologies, and diversity and inclusion in higher education and the school context.Chang ZhuChang Zhu is a full professor in Educational Sciences at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). She is the promoter and principal investigator of several key fundamental research projects in the field of higher education, internationalization, university governance, academic leadership, digital competence, digital pedagogy, educational innovations, online and blended learning, MOOC, ICT-supported learning, and social inclusion in digital learning environments.Aysun CaliskanAysun Caliskan is a postdoctoral researcher in Educational Sciences at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Her research mainly focuses on academic leadership, university governance, organizational culture, and educational innovations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Leadership in Education\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Leadership in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2274364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Leadership in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2274364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要有充分的证据表明,女性在学术领导中的代表性不足,尤其是在高级领导角色中。然而,人们对她们面临的障碍和能够促进两性平等的体制措施了解有限。本研究旨在通过探讨不同性别和国家的学术领袖的看法和经验来填补这一空白。利用现象学设计的定性研究方法,我们分析了参加LEAD2 MOOC“性别与学术领导力”论坛的75位学术领袖的讨论。对论坛的专题分析揭示了社会文化障碍,如性别歧视,植根于男性主导结构的组织障碍,以及个人障碍,如工作-生活冲突。该研究还强调了可以减轻这些障碍的制度政策和做法,例如无意识偏见培训、透明的招聘和晋升标准以及家庭友好措施。研究结果不仅全面了解了女性在学术领导中面临的挑战,而且为政策制定者和机构提供了切实可行的建议。最后,本研究可以作为未来学术领导力发展计划的基础,旨在赋予女性领导者权力。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究没有得到任何公共、商业或非营利部门资助机构的特别资助。作者简介:marta Lucchetti是一名博士候选人,全职从事博士研究。她的研究兴趣包括教育领导、教育创新、教育技术、高等教育和学校环境中的多样性和包容性。常竹,布鲁塞尔自由大学教育科学专业正教授。她是高等教育、国际化、大学治理、学术领导、数字能力、数字教学法、教育创新、在线和混合学习、MOOC、ict支持的学习以及数字学习环境中的社会包容等领域的几个关键基础研究项目的发起人和首席研究员。Aysun Caliskan是布鲁塞尔自由大学(VUB)教育科学博士后研究员。主要研究方向为学术领导、大学治理、组织文化和教育创新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived gender barriers and recommendations for addressing gender inequality in academic leadership: a thematic analysis of MOOC discussion forums
ABSTRACTThere is ample evidence of the underrepresentation of women in academic leadership, especially in senior leadership roles. However, there is limited understanding of the barriers they face and the institutional measures that can promote gender equality. This study aims to fill this gap by exploring the perceptions and experiences of academic leaders of different genders and countries. Utilizing a qualitative research approach with a phenomenological design, we analyzed discussions from 75 academic leaders who participated in the LEAD2 MOOC forum on ‘Gender and Academic Leadership’. A thematic analysis of the discussion forum revealed socio-cultural barriers such as gender discrimination, organizational barriers rooted in male-dominated structures, and individual barriers such as work-life conflict. The study also highlights institutional policies and practices, such as unconscious bias training, transparent hiring and promotion criteria, and family-friendly measures, that can mitigate these barriers. The findings not only provide a comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by women in academic leadership but also offer practical recommendations for policymakers and institutions. Finally, this study can serve as a foundation for future academic leadership development programs aimed at empowering female leaders. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectorsNotes on contributorsMarta LucchettiMarta Lucchetti is a Ph.D. candidate and working full-time on her Ph.D. research. Her research interests include educational leadership, educational innovation, educational technologies, and diversity and inclusion in higher education and the school context.Chang ZhuChang Zhu is a full professor in Educational Sciences at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). She is the promoter and principal investigator of several key fundamental research projects in the field of higher education, internationalization, university governance, academic leadership, digital competence, digital pedagogy, educational innovations, online and blended learning, MOOC, ICT-supported learning, and social inclusion in digital learning environments.Aysun CaliskanAysun Caliskan is a postdoctoral researcher in Educational Sciences at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Her research mainly focuses on academic leadership, university governance, organizational culture, and educational innovations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Leadership in Education
International Journal of Leadership in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory & Practice is an international journal for the publication of theoretical and practical discussions of educational leadership. The Journal presents: •cutting-edge writing on educational leadership, including instructional supervision, curriculum and teaching development, staff development, educational administration and more; •an alternative voice: reports of alternative theoretical perspectives, alternative methodologies, and alternative experiences of leadership; •a broad definition of leadership, including teachers-as-leaders, shared governance, site-based decision making, and community-school collaborations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信