专业发展品质与教学效能:检验教师自我效能信念的中介作用

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Iksang Yoon, Roger D. Goddard
{"title":"专业发展品质与教学效能:检验教师自我效能信念的中介作用","authors":"Iksang Yoon, Roger D. Goddard","doi":"10.1080/19415257.2023.2264309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to understand the mechanism linking the quality of professional development (PD) to instructional effectiveness by focusing on the mediating role of teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Based on social cognitive theory and using the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 dataset, we confirmed that teacher self-efficacy beliefs significantly mediate the relation between PD quality and three indicators of instructional effectiveness – clarity of instruction, cognitive activation, and classroom management. Specifically, partial mediation was found for clarity of instruction and cognitive activation, while full mediation was found for classroom management. Our findings suggest that the relationship between PD quality and specific types of instructional practice is highly nuanced and mediated by teacher’ self-efficacy beliefs. We discuss the implications of our findings for theory, future research, and practice.KEYWORDS: Professional development qualityinstructional effectivenessteacher self-efficacystructural equation modellingmediation Disclosure statementThere are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report.Notes1. This sample does not include teachers who are marked as ‘logically not applicable’ (e.g. those who did not participate in any PD activities during the past academic year) and ‘not administered’ (e.g. those who were not asked to complete this portion of the survey).2. While Cochran-Smith and Lytle (Citation1999) observed that the informal patterns of interaction and social discourse in which teachers engage within their communities of practice can also constitute a form of PD, we were only able to reflect formal PD activities of teachers given the measures available in the TALIS dataset.3. Because Mplus 8.1 cannot automatically conduct bootstrapping procedures with multiple imputed datasets simultaneously, we conducted the 1,000 bootstrapping procedures for each of the 20 imputed datasets separately and reported their average confidence intervals.","PeriodicalId":47497,"journal":{"name":"Professional Development in Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional development quality and instructional effectiveness: Testing the mediating role of teacher self-efficacy beliefs\",\"authors\":\"Iksang Yoon, Roger D. Goddard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19415257.2023.2264309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to understand the mechanism linking the quality of professional development (PD) to instructional effectiveness by focusing on the mediating role of teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Based on social cognitive theory and using the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 dataset, we confirmed that teacher self-efficacy beliefs significantly mediate the relation between PD quality and three indicators of instructional effectiveness – clarity of instruction, cognitive activation, and classroom management. Specifically, partial mediation was found for clarity of instruction and cognitive activation, while full mediation was found for classroom management. Our findings suggest that the relationship between PD quality and specific types of instructional practice is highly nuanced and mediated by teacher’ self-efficacy beliefs. We discuss the implications of our findings for theory, future research, and practice.KEYWORDS: Professional development qualityinstructional effectivenessteacher self-efficacystructural equation modellingmediation Disclosure statementThere are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report.Notes1. This sample does not include teachers who are marked as ‘logically not applicable’ (e.g. those who did not participate in any PD activities during the past academic year) and ‘not administered’ (e.g. those who were not asked to complete this portion of the survey).2. While Cochran-Smith and Lytle (Citation1999) observed that the informal patterns of interaction and social discourse in which teachers engage within their communities of practice can also constitute a form of PD, we were only able to reflect formal PD activities of teachers given the measures available in the TALIS dataset.3. Because Mplus 8.1 cannot automatically conduct bootstrapping procedures with multiple imputed datasets simultaneously, we conducted the 1,000 bootstrapping procedures for each of the 20 imputed datasets separately and reported their average confidence intervals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professional Development in Education\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professional Development in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2264309\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Development in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2264309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在通过关注教师效能感信念的中介作用,了解专业发展质量对教学效能的影响机制。基于社会认知理论,利用2018年《教与学国际调查》(TALIS)数据集,我们证实了教师自我效能感信念在PD质量与教学效果的三个指标(教学清晰度、认知激活和课堂管理)之间具有显著的中介作用。具体而言,在教学清晰度和认知激活方面存在部分中介作用,而在课堂管理方面存在完全中介作用。我们的研究结果表明,PD质量与特定类型的教学实践之间的关系是非常微妙的,并受到教师自我效能感信念的中介。我们讨论了我们的发现对理论、未来研究和实践的影响。关键词:专业发展质量、教学效果、教师自我效能感、结构方程模型、中介披露声明无相关财务或非财务竞争利益需要报告。本样本不包括被标记为“逻辑上不适用”的教师(例如,在过去的学年中没有参加任何PD活动的教师)和“未被管理”的教师(例如,没有被要求完成这部分调查的教师)。虽然Cochran-Smith和Lytle (Citation1999)观察到教师在其实践社区中参与的非正式互动模式和社会话语也可以构成PD的一种形式,但我们只能根据TALIS数据集中提供的措施来反映教师的正式PD活动。由于Mplus 8.1不能同时对多个输入数据集自动进行bootstrapping过程,我们对20个输入数据集分别进行了1000个bootstrapping过程,并报告了它们的平均置信区间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Professional development quality and instructional effectiveness: Testing the mediating role of teacher self-efficacy beliefs
ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study was to understand the mechanism linking the quality of professional development (PD) to instructional effectiveness by focusing on the mediating role of teachers’ efficacy beliefs. Based on social cognitive theory and using the Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 dataset, we confirmed that teacher self-efficacy beliefs significantly mediate the relation between PD quality and three indicators of instructional effectiveness – clarity of instruction, cognitive activation, and classroom management. Specifically, partial mediation was found for clarity of instruction and cognitive activation, while full mediation was found for classroom management. Our findings suggest that the relationship between PD quality and specific types of instructional practice is highly nuanced and mediated by teacher’ self-efficacy beliefs. We discuss the implications of our findings for theory, future research, and practice.KEYWORDS: Professional development qualityinstructional effectivenessteacher self-efficacystructural equation modellingmediation Disclosure statementThere are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report.Notes1. This sample does not include teachers who are marked as ‘logically not applicable’ (e.g. those who did not participate in any PD activities during the past academic year) and ‘not administered’ (e.g. those who were not asked to complete this portion of the survey).2. While Cochran-Smith and Lytle (Citation1999) observed that the informal patterns of interaction and social discourse in which teachers engage within their communities of practice can also constitute a form of PD, we were only able to reflect formal PD activities of teachers given the measures available in the TALIS dataset.3. Because Mplus 8.1 cannot automatically conduct bootstrapping procedures with multiple imputed datasets simultaneously, we conducted the 1,000 bootstrapping procedures for each of the 20 imputed datasets separately and reported their average confidence intervals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Professional Development in Education
Professional Development in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信