Jan Kabisch, Gyde Joswig, Christina Böhnlein, Gregor Fiedler, Charles M. A. P. Franz
{"title":"德国零售素食碎肉产品的微生物状况","authors":"Jan Kabisch, Gyde Joswig, Christina Böhnlein, Gregor Fiedler, Charles M. A. P. Franz","doi":"10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The microbiological status of 10 raw plant-based ground meat products was assessed to obtain insight into contamination levels and the types of bacteria present in these meat analogues. The total bacterial counts at the end of the best before date varied greatly from below 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g to 8.31 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, while the median count was 3.89 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g. For each product, the lactic acid bacterial counts were similar, although generally between ca. 0.5 and 1 log<sub>10</sub> lower than the total bacterial counts, indicating that lactic acid bacteria were a majority in the microbiota of these products. While the median counts of toxigenic pathogens were generally very low (< 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g), the maximum counts detected in some samples could reach up to ca. 3.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g for presumptive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Bacillus cereus.</i> No <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> colonies were obtained in this investigation; however, other <i>Listeria</i> spp. were detected. Thus, the results show that a (re)contamination of these products by pathogenic bacteria can be a potential safety concern. Furthermore, the detection of presumptive <i>B. cereus</i> and the isolation of various <i>Clostridium</i> species from these products indicates that spore-formers may have survived the food processing and therefore, could pose a safety concern, which should be assessed in further studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","volume":"19 1","pages":"33 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological status of vegan ground meat products from German retail\",\"authors\":\"Jan Kabisch, Gyde Joswig, Christina Böhnlein, Gregor Fiedler, Charles M. A. P. Franz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The microbiological status of 10 raw plant-based ground meat products was assessed to obtain insight into contamination levels and the types of bacteria present in these meat analogues. The total bacterial counts at the end of the best before date varied greatly from below 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g to 8.31 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, while the median count was 3.89 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g. For each product, the lactic acid bacterial counts were similar, although generally between ca. 0.5 and 1 log<sub>10</sub> lower than the total bacterial counts, indicating that lactic acid bacteria were a majority in the microbiota of these products. While the median counts of toxigenic pathogens were generally very low (< 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g), the maximum counts detected in some samples could reach up to ca. 3.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g for presumptive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Bacillus cereus.</i> No <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> colonies were obtained in this investigation; however, other <i>Listeria</i> spp. were detected. Thus, the results show that a (re)contamination of these products by pathogenic bacteria can be a potential safety concern. Furthermore, the detection of presumptive <i>B. cereus</i> and the isolation of various <i>Clostridium</i> species from these products indicates that spore-formers may have survived the food processing and therefore, could pose a safety concern, which should be assessed in further studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Microbiological status of vegan ground meat products from German retail
The microbiological status of 10 raw plant-based ground meat products was assessed to obtain insight into contamination levels and the types of bacteria present in these meat analogues. The total bacterial counts at the end of the best before date varied greatly from below 1.0 log10 CFU/g to 8.31 log10 CFU/g, while the median count was 3.89 log10 CFU/g. For each product, the lactic acid bacterial counts were similar, although generally between ca. 0.5 and 1 log10 lower than the total bacterial counts, indicating that lactic acid bacteria were a majority in the microbiota of these products. While the median counts of toxigenic pathogens were generally very low (< 1.0 log10 CFU/g), the maximum counts detected in some samples could reach up to ca. 3.0 log10 CFU/g for presumptive Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus. No Listeria monocytogenes colonies were obtained in this investigation; however, other Listeria spp. were detected. Thus, the results show that a (re)contamination of these products by pathogenic bacteria can be a potential safety concern. Furthermore, the detection of presumptive B. cereus and the isolation of various Clostridium species from these products indicates that spore-formers may have survived the food processing and therefore, could pose a safety concern, which should be assessed in further studies.
期刊介绍:
The JCF publishes peer-reviewed original Research Articles and Opinions that are of direct importance to Food and Feed Safety. This includes Food Packaging, Consumer Products as well as Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering.
All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve Consumer Health Protection. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of Food and Feed Safety issues on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of Food and Feed Safety and Consumer Health Protection.
Manuscripts – preferably written in English but also in German – are published as Research Articles, Reviews, Methods and Short Communications and should cover aspects including, but not limited to:
· Factors influencing Food and Feed Safety
· Factors influencing Consumer Health Protection
· Factors influencing Consumer Behavior
· Exposure science related to Risk Assessment and Risk Management
· Regulatory aspects related to Food and Feed Safety, Food Packaging, Consumer Products, Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering
· Analytical methods and method validation related to food control and food processing.
The JCF also presents important News, as well as Announcements and Reports about administrative surveillance.