德国零售素食碎肉产品的微生物状况

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jan Kabisch, Gyde Joswig, Christina Böhnlein, Gregor Fiedler, Charles M. A. P. Franz
{"title":"德国零售素食碎肉产品的微生物状况","authors":"Jan Kabisch,&nbsp;Gyde Joswig,&nbsp;Christina Böhnlein,&nbsp;Gregor Fiedler,&nbsp;Charles M. A. P. Franz","doi":"10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The microbiological status of 10 raw plant-based ground meat products was assessed to obtain insight into contamination levels and the types of bacteria present in these meat analogues. The total bacterial counts at the end of the best before date varied greatly from below 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g to 8.31 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, while the median count was 3.89 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g. For each product, the lactic acid bacterial counts were similar, although generally between ca. 0.5 and 1 log<sub>10</sub> lower than the total bacterial counts, indicating that lactic acid bacteria were a majority in the microbiota of these products. While the median counts of toxigenic pathogens were generally very low (&lt; 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g), the maximum counts detected in some samples could reach up to ca. 3.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g for presumptive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Bacillus cereus.</i> No <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> colonies were obtained in this investigation; however, other <i>Listeria</i> spp. were detected. Thus, the results show that a (re)contamination of these products by pathogenic bacteria can be a potential safety concern. Furthermore, the detection of presumptive <i>B. cereus</i> and the isolation of various <i>Clostridium</i> species from these products indicates that spore-formers may have survived the food processing and therefore, could pose a safety concern, which should be assessed in further studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","volume":"19 1","pages":"33 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbiological status of vegan ground meat products from German retail\",\"authors\":\"Jan Kabisch,&nbsp;Gyde Joswig,&nbsp;Christina Böhnlein,&nbsp;Gregor Fiedler,&nbsp;Charles M. A. P. Franz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The microbiological status of 10 raw plant-based ground meat products was assessed to obtain insight into contamination levels and the types of bacteria present in these meat analogues. The total bacterial counts at the end of the best before date varied greatly from below 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g to 8.31 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g, while the median count was 3.89 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g. For each product, the lactic acid bacterial counts were similar, although generally between ca. 0.5 and 1 log<sub>10</sub> lower than the total bacterial counts, indicating that lactic acid bacteria were a majority in the microbiota of these products. While the median counts of toxigenic pathogens were generally very low (&lt; 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g), the maximum counts detected in some samples could reach up to ca. 3.0 log<sub>10</sub> CFU/g for presumptive <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and <i>Bacillus cereus.</i> No <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> colonies were obtained in this investigation; however, other <i>Listeria</i> spp. were detected. Thus, the results show that a (re)contamination of these products by pathogenic bacteria can be a potential safety concern. Furthermore, the detection of presumptive <i>B. cereus</i> and the isolation of various <i>Clostridium</i> species from these products indicates that spore-formers may have survived the food processing and therefore, could pose a safety concern, which should be assessed in further studies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"33 - 40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-023-01461-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对 10 种植物性生碎肉产品的微生物状况进行了评估,以了解这些肉类类似物的污染水平和细菌类型。最佳食用期结束时的细菌总数差异很大,从低于 1.0 log10 CFU/g 到 8.31 log10 CFU/g,而细菌总数的中位数为 3.89 log10 CFU/g。每种产品的乳酸菌计数相似,但通常比细菌总数低约 0.5 至 1 log10,这表明乳酸菌在这些产品的微生物群中占多数。虽然致毒病原体的中位数通常很低(< 1.0 log10 CFU/g),但在一些样品中检测到的推定金黄色葡萄球菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌的最高计数可达约 3.0 log10 CFU/g。本次调查没有发现李斯特菌菌落,但检测到了其他李斯特菌属。因此,结果表明,这些产品受到致病菌的(再)污染可能是一个潜在的安全问题。此外,从这些产品中检测到假定的蜡样芽孢杆菌和分离到的各种梭状芽孢杆菌表明,孢子形成者可能在食品加工过程中存活下来,因此可能构成安全问题,应在进一步的研究中加以评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Microbiological status of vegan ground meat products from German retail

Microbiological status of vegan ground meat products from German retail

The microbiological status of 10 raw plant-based ground meat products was assessed to obtain insight into contamination levels and the types of bacteria present in these meat analogues. The total bacterial counts at the end of the best before date varied greatly from below 1.0 log10 CFU/g to 8.31 log10 CFU/g, while the median count was 3.89 log10 CFU/g. For each product, the lactic acid bacterial counts were similar, although generally between ca. 0.5 and 1 log10 lower than the total bacterial counts, indicating that lactic acid bacteria were a majority in the microbiota of these products. While the median counts of toxigenic pathogens were generally very low (< 1.0 log10 CFU/g), the maximum counts detected in some samples could reach up to ca. 3.0 log10 CFU/g for presumptive Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus cereus. No Listeria monocytogenes colonies were obtained in this investigation; however, other Listeria spp. were detected. Thus, the results show that a (re)contamination of these products by pathogenic bacteria can be a potential safety concern. Furthermore, the detection of presumptive B. cereus and the isolation of various Clostridium species from these products indicates that spore-formers may have survived the food processing and therefore, could pose a safety concern, which should be assessed in further studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCF publishes peer-reviewed original Research Articles and Opinions that are of direct importance to Food and Feed Safety. This includes Food Packaging, Consumer Products as well as Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve Consumer Health Protection. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of Food and Feed Safety issues on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of Food and Feed Safety and Consumer Health Protection. Manuscripts – preferably written in English but also in German – are published as Research Articles, Reviews, Methods and Short Communications and should cover aspects including, but not limited to: · Factors influencing Food and Feed Safety · Factors influencing Consumer Health Protection · Factors influencing Consumer Behavior · Exposure science related to Risk Assessment and Risk Management · Regulatory aspects related to Food and Feed Safety, Food Packaging, Consumer Products, Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering · Analytical methods and method validation related to food control and food processing. The JCF also presents important News, as well as Announcements and Reports about administrative surveillance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信