运用自我决定理论进行另类供给学生路径规划的探索性研究

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Richard Gregory, Cathy Atkinson
{"title":"运用自我决定理论进行另类供给学生路径规划的探索性研究","authors":"Richard Gregory, Cathy Atkinson","doi":"10.1080/02643944.2023.2247415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case study research explores the potential of a post-16 pathway planning process based upon self-determination theory (SDT). Two male students at an alternative provision (AP), were supported by a behavioural support teacher to take part in a pre-planning meeting with the researcher to explore their post-16 aspirations. They then took part in a planning session within which the discussion and documentation were informed by SDT. A follow up conversation was held with the behavioural support teacher to feed back the contents of the planning sessions and support implementation of any outcomes. One student took part in a follow up interview, the other became uncontactable due to leaving the AP. The planning sessions and the follow up interview were transcribed and thematically analysed. Key themes were particularly consistent with autonomy and relatedness dimensions within SDT. Findings suggest SDT can provide a framework for post-16 planning, through facilitating exploration of goals and aspirations. Student follow-up suggested the process had been autonomy-supporting and a positive experience. Limitations, future directions, and implications for practitioners are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45422,"journal":{"name":"Pastoral Care in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathway planning for alternative provision students using self-determination theory: an exploratory study\",\"authors\":\"Richard Gregory, Cathy Atkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02643944.2023.2247415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case study research explores the potential of a post-16 pathway planning process based upon self-determination theory (SDT). Two male students at an alternative provision (AP), were supported by a behavioural support teacher to take part in a pre-planning meeting with the researcher to explore their post-16 aspirations. They then took part in a planning session within which the discussion and documentation were informed by SDT. A follow up conversation was held with the behavioural support teacher to feed back the contents of the planning sessions and support implementation of any outcomes. One student took part in a follow up interview, the other became uncontactable due to leaving the AP. The planning sessions and the follow up interview were transcribed and thematically analysed. Key themes were particularly consistent with autonomy and relatedness dimensions within SDT. Findings suggest SDT can provide a framework for post-16 planning, through facilitating exploration of goals and aspirations. Student follow-up suggested the process had been autonomy-supporting and a positive experience. Limitations, future directions, and implications for practitioners are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pastoral Care in Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pastoral Care in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2023.2247415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pastoral Care in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2023.2247415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例研究探讨了基于自我决定理论(SDT)的16岁后路径规划过程的潜力。在一名行为支持老师的支持下,两名来自另类学校(AP)的男学生参加了与研究人员的计划前会议,探讨他们16岁后的愿望。然后,他们参加了规划会议,SDT在会议上通报了讨论和文件。与行为支持老师进行了后续对话,以反馈计划会议的内容,并支持任何结果的实施。一名学生参加了后续采访,另一名学生因离开AP而无法联系。计划会议和后续采访被记录下来并进行主题分析。关键主题与SDT中的自主性和相关性维度特别一致。研究结果表明,SDT可以通过促进对目标和愿望的探索,为16岁后的规划提供一个框架。学生的随访表明,这个过程是自主支持的,是一种积极的体验。局限性,未来的方向,并对从业者的影响进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pathway planning for alternative provision students using self-determination theory: an exploratory study
This case study research explores the potential of a post-16 pathway planning process based upon self-determination theory (SDT). Two male students at an alternative provision (AP), were supported by a behavioural support teacher to take part in a pre-planning meeting with the researcher to explore their post-16 aspirations. They then took part in a planning session within which the discussion and documentation were informed by SDT. A follow up conversation was held with the behavioural support teacher to feed back the contents of the planning sessions and support implementation of any outcomes. One student took part in a follow up interview, the other became uncontactable due to leaving the AP. The planning sessions and the follow up interview were transcribed and thematically analysed. Key themes were particularly consistent with autonomy and relatedness dimensions within SDT. Findings suggest SDT can provide a framework for post-16 planning, through facilitating exploration of goals and aspirations. Student follow-up suggested the process had been autonomy-supporting and a positive experience. Limitations, future directions, and implications for practitioners are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pastoral Care in Education
Pastoral Care in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信