加速缩小黑人青年机会差距的战略

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Isaac L. Woods, Scott L. Graves
{"title":"加速缩小黑人青年机会差距的战略","authors":"Isaac L. Woods, Scott L. Graves","doi":"10.1080/00405841.2023.2267396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue of Theory Into Practice is devoted to the closure of opportunity gaps for Black youth. Why is it important to close opportunity gaps for Black youth? First, the opportunity gap was previously called the achievement gap. This change in terminology was needed to reflect more accurately that disparities in student outcomes are more accurately described by the inequitable opportunities to achieve rather than deficit-thinking that placed the blame on the Black youth. Therefore, in this special issue, we describe the opportunity gap as the manifestation of the way external factors can contribute to lower rates of success in educational achievement, career prospects, and other life aspirations (McNamara et al. 2020). This gap is sustained and exacerbated by inequitable distribution of resources such as under-resourced schools (Kitchens, 2021), lack of Black professionals in child-serving professions (e.g. Farinde-Wu et al. 2020), lack of quality teachers as more Black students enroll in a school (Jackson, 2009), the intersection of health disparities and education(Fiscella & Kitzman, 2009), and lastly recent publications have related to Black children are lacking access to appropriate social-emotional learning experiences that humanize them and prepare them for a world of anti-Black racism (i.g. Miller et al, 2022; Rogers et al. 2022). Therefore, this gap cannot be attributed solely to academic instruction nor can it be measured solely through academic achievement. Outcomes of this gap include lower graduation rates, a lack of Black students enrolled in gifted and talented programs, and an overrepresentation of Black children in special education. An example of the punishment gap (Morris et al. 2021), the disproportionate number of Black children in restrictive special education placement (U.S. Department of Education, 2021), and the percentage of Black students in the juvenile justice system (Padgaonkar et al. 2021) collectively provide oppressive conditions that lead to the exclusion of Black children from mainstream educational placements and society. These cataclysmic contributors remove Black children from learning and support a hegemonic relationship that is efficacious to all life-sustaining outcomes. In this issue, we provide nine contributions to eradicate the opportunity gaps for Black children.","PeriodicalId":48177,"journal":{"name":"Theory Into Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies to Accelerate the Closure of Opportunity Gaps for Black Youth\",\"authors\":\"Isaac L. Woods, Scott L. Graves\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00405841.2023.2267396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This issue of Theory Into Practice is devoted to the closure of opportunity gaps for Black youth. Why is it important to close opportunity gaps for Black youth? First, the opportunity gap was previously called the achievement gap. This change in terminology was needed to reflect more accurately that disparities in student outcomes are more accurately described by the inequitable opportunities to achieve rather than deficit-thinking that placed the blame on the Black youth. Therefore, in this special issue, we describe the opportunity gap as the manifestation of the way external factors can contribute to lower rates of success in educational achievement, career prospects, and other life aspirations (McNamara et al. 2020). This gap is sustained and exacerbated by inequitable distribution of resources such as under-resourced schools (Kitchens, 2021), lack of Black professionals in child-serving professions (e.g. Farinde-Wu et al. 2020), lack of quality teachers as more Black students enroll in a school (Jackson, 2009), the intersection of health disparities and education(Fiscella & Kitzman, 2009), and lastly recent publications have related to Black children are lacking access to appropriate social-emotional learning experiences that humanize them and prepare them for a world of anti-Black racism (i.g. Miller et al, 2022; Rogers et al. 2022). Therefore, this gap cannot be attributed solely to academic instruction nor can it be measured solely through academic achievement. Outcomes of this gap include lower graduation rates, a lack of Black students enrolled in gifted and talented programs, and an overrepresentation of Black children in special education. An example of the punishment gap (Morris et al. 2021), the disproportionate number of Black children in restrictive special education placement (U.S. Department of Education, 2021), and the percentage of Black students in the juvenile justice system (Padgaonkar et al. 2021) collectively provide oppressive conditions that lead to the exclusion of Black children from mainstream educational placements and society. These cataclysmic contributors remove Black children from learning and support a hegemonic relationship that is efficacious to all life-sustaining outcomes. In this issue, we provide nine contributions to eradicate the opportunity gaps for Black children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory Into Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory Into Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2267396\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory Into Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2023.2267396","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本期《从理论到实践》致力于消除黑人青年的机会差距。为什么缩小黑人青年的机会差距很重要?首先,机会差距以前被称为成就差距。这种术语上的改变需要更准确地反映出,学生成绩的差异更准确地描述为实现目标的机会不平等,而不是把责任归咎于黑人青年的赤字思维。因此,在本期特刊中,我们将机会差距描述为外部因素可能导致教育成就、职业前景和其他生活抱负成功率降低的表现形式(McNamara et al. 2020)。由于资源分配不公平,如资源不足的学校(Kitchens, 2021)、儿童服务专业中缺乏黑人专业人员(例如farind - wu等人,2020)、随着更多黑人学生入学而缺乏优质教师(Jackson, 2009)、健康差距和教育的交集(fisscella & Kitzman, 2009)、最后,最近的出版物与黑人儿童缺乏适当的社会情感学习经验有关,这些经验使他们人性化,并为反黑人种族主义的世界做好准备(例如Miller等人,2022;Rogers et al. 2022)。因此,这种差距不能仅仅归因于学术指导,也不能仅仅通过学术成就来衡量。这种差距的结果包括毕业率较低,缺乏黑人学生参加天才项目,以及特殊教育中黑人儿童的比例过高。惩罚差距的一个例子(Morris et al. 2021),限制性特殊教育安置中不成比例的黑人儿童(美国教育部,2021),以及少年司法系统中黑人学生的比例(Padgaonkar et al. 2021)共同提供了压迫性条件,导致黑人儿童被主流教育安置和社会排斥。这些灾难性的贡献者剥夺了黑人儿童的学习机会,并支持了一种对所有维持生命的结果都有效的霸权关系。在本期中,我们为消除黑人儿童的机会差距提供了九项贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies to Accelerate the Closure of Opportunity Gaps for Black Youth
This issue of Theory Into Practice is devoted to the closure of opportunity gaps for Black youth. Why is it important to close opportunity gaps for Black youth? First, the opportunity gap was previously called the achievement gap. This change in terminology was needed to reflect more accurately that disparities in student outcomes are more accurately described by the inequitable opportunities to achieve rather than deficit-thinking that placed the blame on the Black youth. Therefore, in this special issue, we describe the opportunity gap as the manifestation of the way external factors can contribute to lower rates of success in educational achievement, career prospects, and other life aspirations (McNamara et al. 2020). This gap is sustained and exacerbated by inequitable distribution of resources such as under-resourced schools (Kitchens, 2021), lack of Black professionals in child-serving professions (e.g. Farinde-Wu et al. 2020), lack of quality teachers as more Black students enroll in a school (Jackson, 2009), the intersection of health disparities and education(Fiscella & Kitzman, 2009), and lastly recent publications have related to Black children are lacking access to appropriate social-emotional learning experiences that humanize them and prepare them for a world of anti-Black racism (i.g. Miller et al, 2022; Rogers et al. 2022). Therefore, this gap cannot be attributed solely to academic instruction nor can it be measured solely through academic achievement. Outcomes of this gap include lower graduation rates, a lack of Black students enrolled in gifted and talented programs, and an overrepresentation of Black children in special education. An example of the punishment gap (Morris et al. 2021), the disproportionate number of Black children in restrictive special education placement (U.S. Department of Education, 2021), and the percentage of Black students in the juvenile justice system (Padgaonkar et al. 2021) collectively provide oppressive conditions that lead to the exclusion of Black children from mainstream educational placements and society. These cataclysmic contributors remove Black children from learning and support a hegemonic relationship that is efficacious to all life-sustaining outcomes. In this issue, we provide nine contributions to eradicate the opportunity gaps for Black children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory Into Practice
Theory Into Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.10%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Published since 1962, Theory Into Practice (TIP) is a nationally recognized, peer reviewed journal featuring multiple perspectives and scholarly, yet practical and engaging, discussions of important issues in education. TIP publishes articles covering all levels and areas of education, including learning and teaching; counseling; assessment; teacher education and professional development; classroom management; administration and supervision; curriculum; policy; and technology. Each issue of TIP is devoted to a timely theme developed by a Guest Editor who has expertise in the theme area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信