教学框架的融合:为启发式学习打造蓝图

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Ami Kantawala
{"title":"教学框架的融合:为启发式学习打造蓝图","authors":"Ami Kantawala","doi":"10.1080/00043125.2023.2261829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For educators, a framework serves as a conceptual guide that outlines how and why learning should occur. It includes the strategies and methods we can use. Why do certain teaching methods excel in specifi c contexts? Why do students succeed with one framework and falter with another? Th ese questions defi ne the essence of pedagogical frameworks and assist educators in navigating the intricacies of teaching and learning. Historically, education focused on memorization and repetition with teachers as the primary knowledge bearers. As our understanding of learning deepened, pedagogical models have evolved. Th e 20th century, championed by progressive educators like John Dewey, Rudolph Steiner, and Maria Montessori—to name a few—transitioned toward hands-on, real-world educational approaches that emphasized holistic education and child-centered learning. However, by the 1950s, the movement declined, partly due to its associations with communism. Th e 1970s saw a resurgence of these ideas, inspired by Paulo Friere and others. By the 1980s, while innovations like David Kolb’s adaptation of experiential learning were emerging, they were still anchored in the foundational ideas of progressive education (Kolb & Kolb, 2005). In the 21st century, the landscape has shift ed. From constructivist to inquiry-based models, we now have a plethora of pedagogical frameworks. Th e introduction of digital technology has also reshaped the scene, bringing forth systems like online learning and blended classrooms, which combine both traditional and emergent techniques. Th is editorial highlights some pivotal educational frameworks discussed by authors in this issue, including culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP), participatory action research (PAR), social–emotional learning (SEL), and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), which infuses technology into pedagogical practices. I invite you to dive deeper into these frameworks, using them as a foundation to refl ect upon and build a more refl exive practice.","PeriodicalId":36828,"journal":{"name":"Art Education","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confluence of Pedagogical Frameworks: Crafting a Blueprint for Inspired Learning\",\"authors\":\"Ami Kantawala\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00043125.2023.2261829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For educators, a framework serves as a conceptual guide that outlines how and why learning should occur. It includes the strategies and methods we can use. Why do certain teaching methods excel in specifi c contexts? Why do students succeed with one framework and falter with another? Th ese questions defi ne the essence of pedagogical frameworks and assist educators in navigating the intricacies of teaching and learning. Historically, education focused on memorization and repetition with teachers as the primary knowledge bearers. As our understanding of learning deepened, pedagogical models have evolved. Th e 20th century, championed by progressive educators like John Dewey, Rudolph Steiner, and Maria Montessori—to name a few—transitioned toward hands-on, real-world educational approaches that emphasized holistic education and child-centered learning. However, by the 1950s, the movement declined, partly due to its associations with communism. Th e 1970s saw a resurgence of these ideas, inspired by Paulo Friere and others. By the 1980s, while innovations like David Kolb’s adaptation of experiential learning were emerging, they were still anchored in the foundational ideas of progressive education (Kolb & Kolb, 2005). In the 21st century, the landscape has shift ed. From constructivist to inquiry-based models, we now have a plethora of pedagogical frameworks. Th e introduction of digital technology has also reshaped the scene, bringing forth systems like online learning and blended classrooms, which combine both traditional and emergent techniques. Th is editorial highlights some pivotal educational frameworks discussed by authors in this issue, including culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP), participatory action research (PAR), social–emotional learning (SEL), and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), which infuses technology into pedagogical practices. I invite you to dive deeper into these frameworks, using them as a foundation to refl ect upon and build a more refl exive practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art Education\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2023.2261829\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2023.2261829","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Confluence of Pedagogical Frameworks: Crafting a Blueprint for Inspired Learning
For educators, a framework serves as a conceptual guide that outlines how and why learning should occur. It includes the strategies and methods we can use. Why do certain teaching methods excel in specifi c contexts? Why do students succeed with one framework and falter with another? Th ese questions defi ne the essence of pedagogical frameworks and assist educators in navigating the intricacies of teaching and learning. Historically, education focused on memorization and repetition with teachers as the primary knowledge bearers. As our understanding of learning deepened, pedagogical models have evolved. Th e 20th century, championed by progressive educators like John Dewey, Rudolph Steiner, and Maria Montessori—to name a few—transitioned toward hands-on, real-world educational approaches that emphasized holistic education and child-centered learning. However, by the 1950s, the movement declined, partly due to its associations with communism. Th e 1970s saw a resurgence of these ideas, inspired by Paulo Friere and others. By the 1980s, while innovations like David Kolb’s adaptation of experiential learning were emerging, they were still anchored in the foundational ideas of progressive education (Kolb & Kolb, 2005). In the 21st century, the landscape has shift ed. From constructivist to inquiry-based models, we now have a plethora of pedagogical frameworks. Th e introduction of digital technology has also reshaped the scene, bringing forth systems like online learning and blended classrooms, which combine both traditional and emergent techniques. Th is editorial highlights some pivotal educational frameworks discussed by authors in this issue, including culturally relevant pedagogy (CRP), participatory action research (PAR), social–emotional learning (SEL), and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), which infuses technology into pedagogical practices. I invite you to dive deeper into these frameworks, using them as a foundation to refl ect upon and build a more refl exive practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Art Education
Art Education Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信