知识与新西兰课程“更新”

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Graham McPhail, Barbara Ormond, Alexis Siteine
{"title":"知识与新西兰课程“更新”","authors":"Graham McPhail, Barbara Ormond, Alexis Siteine","doi":"10.1080/00220272.2023.2256010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper examines the extent to which there has been a shift towards disciplinary knowledge in recently developed curriculum documents in New Zealand and evaluates whether a new ‘Understand, Know, Do’ structure for the curriculum has the potential to facilitate coherent design of teaching programmes and ‘deep learning’. Using a social realist lens, Bernsteinian theories on knowledge structures and recontextualization, and the principles of a Curriculum Design Coherence Model, the analysis identifies instances of both conceptual coherence and epistemic confusion which raises questions about the underlying principles upon which the curriculum documents are being developed.KEYWORDS: disciplinary knowledgecurriculum designsocial realismrecontextualizationcurriculum design coherence model Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. ‘Te Tiriti o Waitangi (in English, the Treaty of Waitangi), New Zealand’s founding document, was meant to be a partnership between Māori and the British Crown. Although it was intended to create unity, different understandings of the treaty, and breaches of it, have caused conflict. From the 1970s the general public gradually came to know more about the treaty, and efforts to honour the treaty and its principles expanded’ (Orange, Citation2023).2. taonga—a treasure, or anything valued by Māori for example the Māori language.3. te reo—the Māori language.4. tikanga—customary practices.5. mātauranga Māori–Māori knowledge.","PeriodicalId":47817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Curriculum Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and the New Zealand curriculum ‘refresh’\",\"authors\":\"Graham McPhail, Barbara Ormond, Alexis Siteine\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00220272.2023.2256010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThis paper examines the extent to which there has been a shift towards disciplinary knowledge in recently developed curriculum documents in New Zealand and evaluates whether a new ‘Understand, Know, Do’ structure for the curriculum has the potential to facilitate coherent design of teaching programmes and ‘deep learning’. Using a social realist lens, Bernsteinian theories on knowledge structures and recontextualization, and the principles of a Curriculum Design Coherence Model, the analysis identifies instances of both conceptual coherence and epistemic confusion which raises questions about the underlying principles upon which the curriculum documents are being developed.KEYWORDS: disciplinary knowledgecurriculum designsocial realismrecontextualizationcurriculum design coherence model Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. ‘Te Tiriti o Waitangi (in English, the Treaty of Waitangi), New Zealand’s founding document, was meant to be a partnership between Māori and the British Crown. Although it was intended to create unity, different understandings of the treaty, and breaches of it, have caused conflict. From the 1970s the general public gradually came to know more about the treaty, and efforts to honour the treaty and its principles expanded’ (Orange, Citation2023).2. taonga—a treasure, or anything valued by Māori for example the Māori language.3. te reo—the Māori language.4. tikanga—customary practices.5. mātauranga Māori–Māori knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Curriculum Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Curriculum Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2256010\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Curriculum Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2023.2256010","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文考察了新西兰最近开发的课程文件中向学科知识转变的程度,并评估了新的“理解,知道,做”课程结构是否有可能促进教学计划和“深度学习”的连贯设计。利用社会现实主义的视角,伯恩斯坦关于知识结构和重新语境化的理论,以及课程设计一致性模型的原则,分析确定了概念一致性和认知混淆的实例,这些实例提出了关于课程文件开发所依据的基本原则的问题。关键词:学科知识课程设计社会现实主义再语境化课程设计连贯性模型披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。新西兰的建国文件《怀唐伊条约》(the Tiriti o Waitangi,英文为《怀唐伊条约》)是Māori和英国王室之间的合作文件。虽然它的目的是建立统一,但对条约的不同理解和违反条约的行为引发了冲突。从20世纪70年代开始,公众逐渐对条约有了更多的了解,尊重条约及其原则的努力也扩大了”(Orange, Citation2023)。淘宝——宝藏,或任何有Māori价值的东西,例如Māori语言。4.使用Māori语言。tikanga-customary practices.5。mātauranga Māori-Māori知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowledge and the New Zealand curriculum ‘refresh’
ABSTRACTThis paper examines the extent to which there has been a shift towards disciplinary knowledge in recently developed curriculum documents in New Zealand and evaluates whether a new ‘Understand, Know, Do’ structure for the curriculum has the potential to facilitate coherent design of teaching programmes and ‘deep learning’. Using a social realist lens, Bernsteinian theories on knowledge structures and recontextualization, and the principles of a Curriculum Design Coherence Model, the analysis identifies instances of both conceptual coherence and epistemic confusion which raises questions about the underlying principles upon which the curriculum documents are being developed.KEYWORDS: disciplinary knowledgecurriculum designsocial realismrecontextualizationcurriculum design coherence model Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. ‘Te Tiriti o Waitangi (in English, the Treaty of Waitangi), New Zealand’s founding document, was meant to be a partnership between Māori and the British Crown. Although it was intended to create unity, different understandings of the treaty, and breaches of it, have caused conflict. From the 1970s the general public gradually came to know more about the treaty, and efforts to honour the treaty and its principles expanded’ (Orange, Citation2023).2. taonga—a treasure, or anything valued by Māori for example the Māori language.3. te reo—the Māori language.4. tikanga—customary practices.5. mātauranga Māori–Māori knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Curriculum Studies
Journal of Curriculum Studies EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
19
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Curriculum Studies publishes conceptually rich contributions to all areas of curriculum studies, including those derived from empirical, philosophical, sociological, or policy-related investigations. The journal welcomes innovative papers that analyse the ways in which the social and institutional conditions of education and schooling contribute to shaping curriculum, including political, social and cultural studies; education policy; school reform and leadership; teaching; teacher education; curriculum development; and assessment and accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies does not subscribe to any particular methodology or theory. As the prime international source for curriculum research, the journal publishes papers accessible to all the national, cultural, and discipline-defined communities that form the readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信