沙特阿拉伯不明原因复发性妊娠丢失妇女的高胰岛素抵抗:一项病例对照研究

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ahlam A Alghamdi, Amani S Alotaibi
{"title":"沙特阿拉伯不明原因复发性妊娠丢失妇女的高胰岛素抵抗:一项病例对照研究","authors":"Ahlam A Alghamdi, Amani S Alotaibi","doi":"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_82_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) accounts for >50% of the patients with RPL. Insulin resistance (IR) is a potential cause of unexplained RPL.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and unexplained RPL among Saudi women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, case-control study conducted at a tertiary hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The study group comprised Saudi women with unexplained RPL, while the control group had Saudi women with at least one live birth and no RPL. Blood samples were taken to determine the fasting glucose (FG) and fasting insulin (FI) levels. Women with diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded. A homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) value ≥3 was considered as IR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study and control groups comprised 43 and 56 women, respectively. Between the groups, there was a significant difference in the mean age (case: 37.9 ± 5.4 years; control: 32.2 ± 5.9 years; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and the mean BMI (case: 31.5 ± 6.0; control: 26.1 ± 2.8; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). FG level was slightly higher in the control group (90.9 mg/dL vs 88.7 mg/dL; <i>P</i> = 0.068). FI level was significantly higher in the study group (16.33 μU/mL vs. 6.17 μU/mL; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). HOMA-IR of ≥3 was significantly more common in the study group (<i>n</i> = 22; 51.2%) than the control group (4; 7.1%) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). After adjusting for age and BMI, IR ≥3 was found to be independently associated with unexplained RPL (aOR: 13.2; 95% CI: 3.77-46.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that Saudi women with unexplained RPL had significantly higher levels of fasting insulin and insulin resistance than those without a history of RPL. Therefore, it is recommended to assess IR in women with RPL.</p>","PeriodicalId":21442,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","volume":"11 4","pages":"314-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Insulin Resistance in Saudi Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Case-control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahlam A Alghamdi, Amani S Alotaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_82_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) accounts for >50% of the patients with RPL. Insulin resistance (IR) is a potential cause of unexplained RPL.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and unexplained RPL among Saudi women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, case-control study conducted at a tertiary hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The study group comprised Saudi women with unexplained RPL, while the control group had Saudi women with at least one live birth and no RPL. Blood samples were taken to determine the fasting glucose (FG) and fasting insulin (FI) levels. Women with diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded. A homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) value ≥3 was considered as IR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study and control groups comprised 43 and 56 women, respectively. Between the groups, there was a significant difference in the mean age (case: 37.9 ± 5.4 years; control: 32.2 ± 5.9 years; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and the mean BMI (case: 31.5 ± 6.0; control: 26.1 ± 2.8; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). FG level was slightly higher in the control group (90.9 mg/dL vs 88.7 mg/dL; <i>P</i> = 0.068). FI level was significantly higher in the study group (16.33 μU/mL vs. 6.17 μU/mL; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). HOMA-IR of ≥3 was significantly more common in the study group (<i>n</i> = 22; 51.2%) than the control group (4; 7.1%) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). After adjusting for age and BMI, IR ≥3 was found to be independently associated with unexplained RPL (aOR: 13.2; 95% CI: 3.77-46.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that Saudi women with unexplained RPL had significantly higher levels of fasting insulin and insulin resistance than those without a history of RPL. Therefore, it is recommended to assess IR in women with RPL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"314-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634469/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_82_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_82_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不明原因复发性妊娠丢失(RPL)占RPL患者的50%。胰岛素抵抗(IR)是原因不明的RPL的潜在原因。目的:评价沙特妇女胰岛素抵抗(IR)与不明原因RPL之间的关系。方法:这是一项在沙特阿拉伯东部省一家三级医院进行的单中心病例对照研究。研究组由患有不明原因RPL的沙特妇女组成,而对照组则有至少一次活产且没有RPL的沙特妇女。取血测定空腹血糖(FG)和空腹胰岛素(FI)水平。排除患有糖尿病和多囊卵巢综合征的女性。稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)值≥3视为IR。结果:研究组和对照组分别有43名和56名妇女。两组患者平均年龄差异有统计学意义(病例:37.9±5.4岁;对照组:32.2±5.9岁;P < 0.0001),平均BMI(病例:31.5±6.0;对照组:26.1±2.8;P < 0.0001)。对照组FG水平略高(90.9 mg/dL vs 88.7 mg/dL;P = 0.068)。研究组FI水平显著高于对照组(16.33 μU/mL vs. 6.17 μU/mL;P < 0.0001)。HOMA-IR≥3在研究组中更为常见(n = 22;51.2%)高于对照组(4%;7.1%) (p < 0.0001)。在调整年龄和BMI后,发现IR≥3与不明原因RPL独立相关(aOR: 13.2;95% ci: 3.77-46.36)。结论:本研究表明,与没有RPL病史的女性相比,患有不明原因RPL的沙特女性的空腹胰岛素和胰岛素抵抗水平明显更高。因此,建议评估RPL妇女的IR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High Insulin Resistance in Saudi Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Case-control Study.

Background: Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) accounts for >50% of the patients with RPL. Insulin resistance (IR) is a potential cause of unexplained RPL.

Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and unexplained RPL among Saudi women.

Methods: This is a single-center, case-control study conducted at a tertiary hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The study group comprised Saudi women with unexplained RPL, while the control group had Saudi women with at least one live birth and no RPL. Blood samples were taken to determine the fasting glucose (FG) and fasting insulin (FI) levels. Women with diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded. A homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) value ≥3 was considered as IR.

Results: The study and control groups comprised 43 and 56 women, respectively. Between the groups, there was a significant difference in the mean age (case: 37.9 ± 5.4 years; control: 32.2 ± 5.9 years; P < 0.0001) and the mean BMI (case: 31.5 ± 6.0; control: 26.1 ± 2.8; P < 0.0001). FG level was slightly higher in the control group (90.9 mg/dL vs 88.7 mg/dL; P = 0.068). FI level was significantly higher in the study group (16.33 μU/mL vs. 6.17 μU/mL; P < 0.0001). HOMA-IR of ≥3 was significantly more common in the study group (n = 22; 51.2%) than the control group (4; 7.1%) (P < 0.0001). After adjusting for age and BMI, IR ≥3 was found to be independently associated with unexplained RPL (aOR: 13.2; 95% CI: 3.77-46.36).

Conclusions: This study showed that Saudi women with unexplained RPL had significantly higher levels of fasting insulin and insulin resistance than those without a history of RPL. Therefore, it is recommended to assess IR in women with RPL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences (SJMMS) is the official scientific journal of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. It is an international peer-reviewed, general medical journal. The scope of the Journal is to publish research that will be of interest to health specialties both in academic and clinical practice. The Journal aims at disseminating high-powered research results with the objective of turning research into knowledge. It seeks to promote scholarly publishing in medicine and medical sciences. The Journal is published in print and online. The target readers of the Journal include all medical and health professionals in the health cluster such as in medicine, dentistry, nursing, applied medical sciences, clinical pharmacology, public health, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信