{"title":"沙特阿拉伯不明原因复发性妊娠丢失妇女的高胰岛素抵抗:一项病例对照研究","authors":"Ahlam A Alghamdi, Amani S Alotaibi","doi":"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_82_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) accounts for >50% of the patients with RPL. Insulin resistance (IR) is a potential cause of unexplained RPL.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and unexplained RPL among Saudi women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, case-control study conducted at a tertiary hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The study group comprised Saudi women with unexplained RPL, while the control group had Saudi women with at least one live birth and no RPL. Blood samples were taken to determine the fasting glucose (FG) and fasting insulin (FI) levels. Women with diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded. A homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) value ≥3 was considered as IR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study and control groups comprised 43 and 56 women, respectively. Between the groups, there was a significant difference in the mean age (case: 37.9 ± 5.4 years; control: 32.2 ± 5.9 years; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and the mean BMI (case: 31.5 ± 6.0; control: 26.1 ± 2.8; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). FG level was slightly higher in the control group (90.9 mg/dL vs 88.7 mg/dL; <i>P</i> = 0.068). FI level was significantly higher in the study group (16.33 μU/mL vs. 6.17 μU/mL; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). HOMA-IR of ≥3 was significantly more common in the study group (<i>n</i> = 22; 51.2%) than the control group (4; 7.1%) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). After adjusting for age and BMI, IR ≥3 was found to be independently associated with unexplained RPL (aOR: 13.2; 95% CI: 3.77-46.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that Saudi women with unexplained RPL had significantly higher levels of fasting insulin and insulin resistance than those without a history of RPL. Therefore, it is recommended to assess IR in women with RPL.</p>","PeriodicalId":21442,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","volume":"11 4","pages":"314-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Insulin Resistance in Saudi Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Case-control Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahlam A Alghamdi, Amani S Alotaibi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_82_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) accounts for >50% of the patients with RPL. Insulin resistance (IR) is a potential cause of unexplained RPL.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and unexplained RPL among Saudi women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, case-control study conducted at a tertiary hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The study group comprised Saudi women with unexplained RPL, while the control group had Saudi women with at least one live birth and no RPL. Blood samples were taken to determine the fasting glucose (FG) and fasting insulin (FI) levels. Women with diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded. A homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) value ≥3 was considered as IR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study and control groups comprised 43 and 56 women, respectively. Between the groups, there was a significant difference in the mean age (case: 37.9 ± 5.4 years; control: 32.2 ± 5.9 years; <i>P</i> < 0.0001) and the mean BMI (case: 31.5 ± 6.0; control: 26.1 ± 2.8; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). FG level was slightly higher in the control group (90.9 mg/dL vs 88.7 mg/dL; <i>P</i> = 0.068). FI level was significantly higher in the study group (16.33 μU/mL vs. 6.17 μU/mL; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). HOMA-IR of ≥3 was significantly more common in the study group (<i>n</i> = 22; 51.2%) than the control group (4; 7.1%) (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). After adjusting for age and BMI, IR ≥3 was found to be independently associated with unexplained RPL (aOR: 13.2; 95% CI: 3.77-46.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that Saudi women with unexplained RPL had significantly higher levels of fasting insulin and insulin resistance than those without a history of RPL. Therefore, it is recommended to assess IR in women with RPL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"314-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10634469/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_82_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_82_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
High Insulin Resistance in Saudi Women with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Case-control Study.
Background: Unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) accounts for >50% of the patients with RPL. Insulin resistance (IR) is a potential cause of unexplained RPL.
Objectives: To evaluate the relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and unexplained RPL among Saudi women.
Methods: This is a single-center, case-control study conducted at a tertiary hospital in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The study group comprised Saudi women with unexplained RPL, while the control group had Saudi women with at least one live birth and no RPL. Blood samples were taken to determine the fasting glucose (FG) and fasting insulin (FI) levels. Women with diabetes mellitus and polycystic ovarian syndrome were excluded. A homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) value ≥3 was considered as IR.
Results: The study and control groups comprised 43 and 56 women, respectively. Between the groups, there was a significant difference in the mean age (case: 37.9 ± 5.4 years; control: 32.2 ± 5.9 years; P < 0.0001) and the mean BMI (case: 31.5 ± 6.0; control: 26.1 ± 2.8; P < 0.0001). FG level was slightly higher in the control group (90.9 mg/dL vs 88.7 mg/dL; P = 0.068). FI level was significantly higher in the study group (16.33 μU/mL vs. 6.17 μU/mL; P < 0.0001). HOMA-IR of ≥3 was significantly more common in the study group (n = 22; 51.2%) than the control group (4; 7.1%) (P < 0.0001). After adjusting for age and BMI, IR ≥3 was found to be independently associated with unexplained RPL (aOR: 13.2; 95% CI: 3.77-46.36).
Conclusions: This study showed that Saudi women with unexplained RPL had significantly higher levels of fasting insulin and insulin resistance than those without a history of RPL. Therefore, it is recommended to assess IR in women with RPL.
期刊介绍:
Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences (SJMMS) is the official scientific journal of Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University. It is an international peer-reviewed, general medical journal. The scope of the Journal is to publish research that will be of interest to health specialties both in academic and clinical practice. The Journal aims at disseminating high-powered research results with the objective of turning research into knowledge. It seeks to promote scholarly publishing in medicine and medical sciences. The Journal is published in print and online. The target readers of the Journal include all medical and health professionals in the health cluster such as in medicine, dentistry, nursing, applied medical sciences, clinical pharmacology, public health, etc.